After the age of criminal responsibility

a defence for children who offend

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1462 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In Scotland, the age of criminal responsibility is eight though children cannot be prosecuted until they are twelve. In England and Wales, for all purposes, the age is ten. This article argues that a further mechanism is needed to protect the young who do wrong within the criminal process and it argues for a new, bespoke defence, to be available to young people from the age of criminal responsibility until they attain the age of 18. It looks firstly at criminal capacity – what it is that needs to be understood fairly to hold anyone criminally responsible - and draws on material from developmental psychology and neuroscience, as well as looking at the child’s lived experience, to provide some evidence that the young may, without fault, lack this capacity. It then examines the use of age generally in law, and the age of criminal responsibility within this. Next, it considers existing lack of capacity defences – nonage; diminished responsibility; insanity (or mental disorder) and absence of mens rea - to consider their suitability for use by young and immature defendants. Finally, it presents a proposal for the form of the new defence, taking into account the need for balance with the public interest in conviction of the guilty. Throughout, it notes and analyses the Law Commission’s proposals in this respect.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-341
Number of pages16
JournalNorthern Ireland Legal Quarterly
Volume67
Issue number3
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 8 Aug 2016

Fingerprint

age of criminal responsibility
developmental psychology
Law
lack
mental disorder
neurosciences
public interest
responsibility
evidence
experience

Keywords

  • age of criminal responsibility
  • criminal defences
  • developmental immaturity
  • non-age
  • chilldhood and crime
  • criminal capacity

Cite this

@article{c605813c364d4fb1ac9f9fddc2ab7cc9,
title = "After the age of criminal responsibility: a defence for children who offend",
abstract = "In Scotland, the age of criminal responsibility is eight though children cannot be prosecuted until they are twelve. In England and Wales, for all purposes, the age is ten. This article argues that a further mechanism is needed to protect the young who do wrong within the criminal process and it argues for a new, bespoke defence, to be available to young people from the age of criminal responsibility until they attain the age of 18. It looks firstly at criminal capacity – what it is that needs to be understood fairly to hold anyone criminally responsible - and draws on material from developmental psychology and neuroscience, as well as looking at the child’s lived experience, to provide some evidence that the young may, without fault, lack this capacity. It then examines the use of age generally in law, and the age of criminal responsibility within this. Next, it considers existing lack of capacity defences – nonage; diminished responsibility; insanity (or mental disorder) and absence of mens rea - to consider their suitability for use by young and immature defendants. Finally, it presents a proposal for the form of the new defence, taking into account the need for balance with the public interest in conviction of the guilty. Throughout, it notes and analyses the Law Commission’s proposals in this respect.",
keywords = "age of criminal responsibility, criminal defences, developmental immaturity, non-age, chilldhood and crime, criminal capacity",
author = "Claire McDiarmid",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "327--341",
journal = "Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly",
issn = "0029-3105",
number = "3",

}

After the age of criminal responsibility : a defence for children who offend. / McDiarmid, Claire.

In: Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, Vol. 67, No. 3, 08.08.2016, p. 327-341.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - After the age of criminal responsibility

T2 - a defence for children who offend

AU - McDiarmid, Claire

PY - 2016/8/8

Y1 - 2016/8/8

N2 - In Scotland, the age of criminal responsibility is eight though children cannot be prosecuted until they are twelve. In England and Wales, for all purposes, the age is ten. This article argues that a further mechanism is needed to protect the young who do wrong within the criminal process and it argues for a new, bespoke defence, to be available to young people from the age of criminal responsibility until they attain the age of 18. It looks firstly at criminal capacity – what it is that needs to be understood fairly to hold anyone criminally responsible - and draws on material from developmental psychology and neuroscience, as well as looking at the child’s lived experience, to provide some evidence that the young may, without fault, lack this capacity. It then examines the use of age generally in law, and the age of criminal responsibility within this. Next, it considers existing lack of capacity defences – nonage; diminished responsibility; insanity (or mental disorder) and absence of mens rea - to consider their suitability for use by young and immature defendants. Finally, it presents a proposal for the form of the new defence, taking into account the need for balance with the public interest in conviction of the guilty. Throughout, it notes and analyses the Law Commission’s proposals in this respect.

AB - In Scotland, the age of criminal responsibility is eight though children cannot be prosecuted until they are twelve. In England and Wales, for all purposes, the age is ten. This article argues that a further mechanism is needed to protect the young who do wrong within the criminal process and it argues for a new, bespoke defence, to be available to young people from the age of criminal responsibility until they attain the age of 18. It looks firstly at criminal capacity – what it is that needs to be understood fairly to hold anyone criminally responsible - and draws on material from developmental psychology and neuroscience, as well as looking at the child’s lived experience, to provide some evidence that the young may, without fault, lack this capacity. It then examines the use of age generally in law, and the age of criminal responsibility within this. Next, it considers existing lack of capacity defences – nonage; diminished responsibility; insanity (or mental disorder) and absence of mens rea - to consider their suitability for use by young and immature defendants. Finally, it presents a proposal for the form of the new defence, taking into account the need for balance with the public interest in conviction of the guilty. Throughout, it notes and analyses the Law Commission’s proposals in this respect.

KW - age of criminal responsibility

KW - criminal defences

KW - developmental immaturity

KW - non-age

KW - chilldhood and crime

KW - criminal capacity

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 327

EP - 341

JO - Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly

JF - Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly

SN - 0029-3105

IS - 3

ER -