Affirmative action in the legal profession

Donald Nicolson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines whether the legal profession should use quotas and decision-making preferences in recruitment and promotion in favour of women, ethnic minorities, and those from socially disadvantaged backgrounds. It argues that this is necessary to eradicate current patterns of discrimination and disadvantage. It also argues that quotas and decision-making preferences do not necessarily conflict with appointment or promotion on merit, and hence that consequent unfairness to other applicants is more apparent than real. Moreover, any potential stigmatization of the beneficiaries of affirmative action is outweighed by the advantages in reversing the under-representation of women, ethnic minorities, and those from socially disadvantaged background, thereby challenging perceptions of their inferior qualities as lawyers. Finally, practical problems in the implementation of affirmative action are considered and argued to be insufficiently serious to stand in the way of its introduction.
LanguageEnglish
Pages109-125
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Law and Society
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2006

Fingerprint

legal profession
affirmative action
national minority
promotion
decision making
stigmatization
applicant
lawyer
discrimination

Keywords

  • legal profession
  • equal opportunities
  • sex discrimination
  • employment law
  • quota systems

Cite this

Nicolson, Donald. / Affirmative action in the legal profession. In: Journal of Law and Society. 2006 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 109-125.
@article{9e8492ebb64949668e675c62e53d7e2d,
title = "Affirmative action in the legal profession",
abstract = "This article examines whether the legal profession should use quotas and decision-making preferences in recruitment and promotion in favour of women, ethnic minorities, and those from socially disadvantaged backgrounds. It argues that this is necessary to eradicate current patterns of discrimination and disadvantage. It also argues that quotas and decision-making preferences do not necessarily conflict with appointment or promotion on merit, and hence that consequent unfairness to other applicants is more apparent than real. Moreover, any potential stigmatization of the beneficiaries of affirmative action is outweighed by the advantages in reversing the under-representation of women, ethnic minorities, and those from socially disadvantaged background, thereby challenging perceptions of their inferior qualities as lawyers. Finally, practical problems in the implementation of affirmative action are considered and argued to be insufficiently serious to stand in the way of its introduction.",
keywords = "legal profession, equal opportunities, sex discrimination, employment law, quota systems",
author = "Donald Nicolson",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00350.x",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "109--125",
journal = "Journal of Law and Society",
issn = "0263-323X",
number = "1",

}

Affirmative action in the legal profession. / Nicolson, Donald.

In: Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 31, No. 1, 03.2006, p. 109-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Affirmative action in the legal profession

AU - Nicolson, Donald

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - This article examines whether the legal profession should use quotas and decision-making preferences in recruitment and promotion in favour of women, ethnic minorities, and those from socially disadvantaged backgrounds. It argues that this is necessary to eradicate current patterns of discrimination and disadvantage. It also argues that quotas and decision-making preferences do not necessarily conflict with appointment or promotion on merit, and hence that consequent unfairness to other applicants is more apparent than real. Moreover, any potential stigmatization of the beneficiaries of affirmative action is outweighed by the advantages in reversing the under-representation of women, ethnic minorities, and those from socially disadvantaged background, thereby challenging perceptions of their inferior qualities as lawyers. Finally, practical problems in the implementation of affirmative action are considered and argued to be insufficiently serious to stand in the way of its introduction.

AB - This article examines whether the legal profession should use quotas and decision-making preferences in recruitment and promotion in favour of women, ethnic minorities, and those from socially disadvantaged backgrounds. It argues that this is necessary to eradicate current patterns of discrimination and disadvantage. It also argues that quotas and decision-making preferences do not necessarily conflict with appointment or promotion on merit, and hence that consequent unfairness to other applicants is more apparent than real. Moreover, any potential stigmatization of the beneficiaries of affirmative action is outweighed by the advantages in reversing the under-representation of women, ethnic minorities, and those from socially disadvantaged background, thereby challenging perceptions of their inferior qualities as lawyers. Finally, practical problems in the implementation of affirmative action are considered and argued to be insufficiently serious to stand in the way of its introduction.

KW - legal profession

KW - equal opportunities

KW - sex discrimination

KW - employment law

KW - quota systems

UR - http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/ref/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00350.x

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00350.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00350.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00350.x

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 109

EP - 125

JO - Journal of Law and Society

T2 - Journal of Law and Society

JF - Journal of Law and Society

SN - 0263-323X

IS - 1

ER -