Advocating a utilitarian profession in a Kantian world? LIS ethical reflection and the challenges of political philosophy

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

The over-arching political philosophy of the past 30 years has seen a movement from the Utilitarian principles that had dominated since the mid to late Victorian period to a more Kantian, rights-based approach to justification of public services and professions.
Political philosophy has a major impact on the ethical parameters in which professions operate. In publically-funded libraries a change in such philosophy can alter the aims and objectives of the organisation, and even the justification for its very existence. In a sector that grew out of the Utilitarian era, such as public libraries, old arguments for advocacy that have been used historically hold little sway with elected officials and managers inculcated within a rights-based framework.
LIS professional education rarely fills such gaps; while many LIS courses contain modules that deal in professional ethics, a key tangential issue is the understanding of political philosophy and the motivations and beliefs of those who fund library services. Conversely many elected officials come to public service with an education that covers the broadest range of political philosophy. In the UK, North America and Europe, for instance, the PPE degree (politics, philosophy, and economics) and its variants are a staple of the ruling classes. Such a background sees them well able to understand and be able to rebut any arguments for justifying services that do not fit into the rights-based approach. LIS professionals’ ethical reflection must become more strategic and be aimed at advocacy that is effective and will be understood by elected officials influenced by rights-based arguments.
Utilising the public library service as an example, this paper will identify how many in the profession may have strategically misfired in terms of their advocacy approach, and instead suggest how ethical reflection could be enhanced by presenting the justification of library services within the philosophical context of the day, and how in doing so fill a major gap in the knowledge of many library and information professionals.
It will be argued that used in partnership with ethical codes, such a focused ethical reflection can take such static documents and apply them to myriad real scenarios, enabling them to become a living embodiment of active ethical reflection in library and information services.

Conference

ConferenceIFLA World Library and Information Congress. 80th IFLA General Conference and Assembly
CountryFrance
CityLyon
Period16/08/1422/08/14
OtherLibraries, Citizens, Societies: Confluence for Knowledge

Fingerprint

political philosophy
profession
public service
ruling class
professional ethics
information service
education
manager
scenario
politics
economics

Keywords

  • public libraries
  • ethics
  • political philosophy
  • kantian
  • utilitarian
  • ethical reflection
  • advocacy

Cite this

McMenemy, D. (2014). Advocating a utilitarian profession in a Kantian world? LIS ethical reflection and the challenges of political philosophy. Paper presented at IFLA World Library and Information Congress. 80th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, Lyon, France.
McMenemy, David. / Advocating a utilitarian profession in a Kantian world? LIS ethical reflection and the challenges of political philosophy. Paper presented at IFLA World Library and Information Congress. 80th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, Lyon, France.8 p.
@conference{e7a90fe76cd34c3fa6625ac562842409,
title = "Advocating a utilitarian profession in a Kantian world? LIS ethical reflection and the challenges of political philosophy",
abstract = "The over-arching political philosophy of the past 30 years has seen a movement from the Utilitarian principles that had dominated since the mid to late Victorian period to a more Kantian, rights-based approach to justification of public services and professions. Political philosophy has a major impact on the ethical parameters in which professions operate. In publically-funded libraries a change in such philosophy can alter the aims and objectives of the organisation, and even the justification for its very existence. In a sector that grew out of the Utilitarian era, such as public libraries, old arguments for advocacy that have been used historically hold little sway with elected officials and managers inculcated within a rights-based framework.LIS professional education rarely fills such gaps; while many LIS courses contain modules that deal in professional ethics, a key tangential issue is the understanding of political philosophy and the motivations and beliefs of those who fund library services. Conversely many elected officials come to public service with an education that covers the broadest range of political philosophy. In the UK, North America and Europe, for instance, the PPE degree (politics, philosophy, and economics) and its variants are a staple of the ruling classes. Such a background sees them well able to understand and be able to rebut any arguments for justifying services that do not fit into the rights-based approach. LIS professionals’ ethical reflection must become more strategic and be aimed at advocacy that is effective and will be understood by elected officials influenced by rights-based arguments.Utilising the public library service as an example, this paper will identify how many in the profession may have strategically misfired in terms of their advocacy approach, and instead suggest how ethical reflection could be enhanced by presenting the justification of library services within the philosophical context of the day, and how in doing so fill a major gap in the knowledge of many library and information professionals. It will be argued that used in partnership with ethical codes, such a focused ethical reflection can take such static documents and apply them to myriad real scenarios, enabling them to become a living embodiment of active ethical reflection in library and information services.",
keywords = "public libraries, ethics, political philosophy, kantian, utilitarian, ethical reflection, advocacy",
author = "David McMenemy",
note = "Committee on Free Access to Information and Freedom of Expression (FAIFE). FAIFE Satellite Meeting 2014 in collaboration with Globethics.net.; IFLA World Library and Information Congress. 80th IFLA General Conference and Assembly ; Conference date: 16-08-2014 Through 22-08-2014",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
day = "15",
language = "English",

}

McMenemy, D 2014, 'Advocating a utilitarian profession in a Kantian world? LIS ethical reflection and the challenges of political philosophy' Paper presented at IFLA World Library and Information Congress. 80th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, Lyon, France, 16/08/14 - 22/08/14, .

Advocating a utilitarian profession in a Kantian world? LIS ethical reflection and the challenges of political philosophy. / McMenemy, David.

2014. Paper presented at IFLA World Library and Information Congress. 80th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, Lyon, France.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Advocating a utilitarian profession in a Kantian world? LIS ethical reflection and the challenges of political philosophy

AU - McMenemy, David

N1 - Committee on Free Access to Information and Freedom of Expression (FAIFE). FAIFE Satellite Meeting 2014 in collaboration with Globethics.net.

PY - 2014/8/15

Y1 - 2014/8/15

N2 - The over-arching political philosophy of the past 30 years has seen a movement from the Utilitarian principles that had dominated since the mid to late Victorian period to a more Kantian, rights-based approach to justification of public services and professions. Political philosophy has a major impact on the ethical parameters in which professions operate. In publically-funded libraries a change in such philosophy can alter the aims and objectives of the organisation, and even the justification for its very existence. In a sector that grew out of the Utilitarian era, such as public libraries, old arguments for advocacy that have been used historically hold little sway with elected officials and managers inculcated within a rights-based framework.LIS professional education rarely fills such gaps; while many LIS courses contain modules that deal in professional ethics, a key tangential issue is the understanding of political philosophy and the motivations and beliefs of those who fund library services. Conversely many elected officials come to public service with an education that covers the broadest range of political philosophy. In the UK, North America and Europe, for instance, the PPE degree (politics, philosophy, and economics) and its variants are a staple of the ruling classes. Such a background sees them well able to understand and be able to rebut any arguments for justifying services that do not fit into the rights-based approach. LIS professionals’ ethical reflection must become more strategic and be aimed at advocacy that is effective and will be understood by elected officials influenced by rights-based arguments.Utilising the public library service as an example, this paper will identify how many in the profession may have strategically misfired in terms of their advocacy approach, and instead suggest how ethical reflection could be enhanced by presenting the justification of library services within the philosophical context of the day, and how in doing so fill a major gap in the knowledge of many library and information professionals. It will be argued that used in partnership with ethical codes, such a focused ethical reflection can take such static documents and apply them to myriad real scenarios, enabling them to become a living embodiment of active ethical reflection in library and information services.

AB - The over-arching political philosophy of the past 30 years has seen a movement from the Utilitarian principles that had dominated since the mid to late Victorian period to a more Kantian, rights-based approach to justification of public services and professions. Political philosophy has a major impact on the ethical parameters in which professions operate. In publically-funded libraries a change in such philosophy can alter the aims and objectives of the organisation, and even the justification for its very existence. In a sector that grew out of the Utilitarian era, such as public libraries, old arguments for advocacy that have been used historically hold little sway with elected officials and managers inculcated within a rights-based framework.LIS professional education rarely fills such gaps; while many LIS courses contain modules that deal in professional ethics, a key tangential issue is the understanding of political philosophy and the motivations and beliefs of those who fund library services. Conversely many elected officials come to public service with an education that covers the broadest range of political philosophy. In the UK, North America and Europe, for instance, the PPE degree (politics, philosophy, and economics) and its variants are a staple of the ruling classes. Such a background sees them well able to understand and be able to rebut any arguments for justifying services that do not fit into the rights-based approach. LIS professionals’ ethical reflection must become more strategic and be aimed at advocacy that is effective and will be understood by elected officials influenced by rights-based arguments.Utilising the public library service as an example, this paper will identify how many in the profession may have strategically misfired in terms of their advocacy approach, and instead suggest how ethical reflection could be enhanced by presenting the justification of library services within the philosophical context of the day, and how in doing so fill a major gap in the knowledge of many library and information professionals. It will be argued that used in partnership with ethical codes, such a focused ethical reflection can take such static documents and apply them to myriad real scenarios, enabling them to become a living embodiment of active ethical reflection in library and information services.

KW - public libraries

KW - ethics

KW - political philosophy

KW - kantian

KW - utilitarian

KW - ethical reflection

KW - advocacy

UR - http://conference.ifla.org/ifla80/calls-for-papers/ethical-dilemmas-information-society-how-codes-ethics-help-find-ethically

UR - http://www.globethics.net/documents/4289936/14121854/FAIFE_GE_conference_Programme.pdf/1527b2a3-a431-4d17-89f3-41566edbaa92

M3 - Paper

ER -

McMenemy D. Advocating a utilitarian profession in a Kantian world? LIS ethical reflection and the challenges of political philosophy. 2014. Paper presented at IFLA World Library and Information Congress. 80th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, Lyon, France.