Administrative review and oversight: the experience of Westminster

Mark Shephard, R. Pelizzo (Editor), R. Staplehurst (Editor)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Parliament has been left behind by far-reaching changes to the constitution, government and society in the past two decades. Despite recent innovations, particularly in the handling of legislation, the central question of Westminster's scrutiny of the executive has not been addressed. (Report of the Hansard Society Commission on Parliamentary Scrutiny, 2001: x) Prior to the Labour Party's election victory in 1997, Labour's manifesto promised an 'effective House of Commons' to be realised in large part through the creation of a special Select Committee with remit to review procedures in light of the 'need for modernisation'. Shortly after victory, Labour established a 'Modernisation Committee' chaired by the Leader of the Commons and with a remit to review four key areas: the legislative process; ministerial accountability; working practices (such as sitting hours); and the style and forms of proceedings. Between 1997 and 2003 the Committee published 19 reports starting with a report on the legislative process. However, to date, most of the reports have focused on the modernisation of working practices and the style and form of proceedings. Reports that deal with improving the effectiveness of ministerial accountability have been notably lacking. Consequently, the view of the Hansard Society that 'parliamentary reform has been one of improving the efficiency of Parliament, but not its effectiveness' appears just as valid three years on.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationLegislatures and Oversight
Pages40-46
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Publication series

NameSeries on contemporary issues in parliamentary development
PublisherWorld Bank Institute Publications

Fingerprint

modernization
parliament
labor
responsibility
experience
Labour Party
constitution
election
legislation
leader
innovation
efficiency
reform
Society

Keywords

  • parliament
  • british politics
  • select committees
  • parliamentary democracy

Cite this

Shephard, M., Pelizzo, R. (Ed.), & Staplehurst, R. (Ed.) (2004). Administrative review and oversight: the experience of Westminster. In Legislatures and Oversight (pp. 40-46). (Series on contemporary issues in parliamentary development).
Shephard, Mark ; Pelizzo, R. (Editor) ; Staplehurst, R. (Editor). / Administrative review and oversight: the experience of Westminster. Legislatures and Oversight. 2004. pp. 40-46 (Series on contemporary issues in parliamentary development).
@inbook{1e4ab57f6fae4586a74c7f4a883a11e9,
title = "Administrative review and oversight: the experience of Westminster",
abstract = "Parliament has been left behind by far-reaching changes to the constitution, government and society in the past two decades. Despite recent innovations, particularly in the handling of legislation, the central question of Westminster's scrutiny of the executive has not been addressed. (Report of the Hansard Society Commission on Parliamentary Scrutiny, 2001: x) Prior to the Labour Party's election victory in 1997, Labour's manifesto promised an 'effective House of Commons' to be realised in large part through the creation of a special Select Committee with remit to review procedures in light of the 'need for modernisation'. Shortly after victory, Labour established a 'Modernisation Committee' chaired by the Leader of the Commons and with a remit to review four key areas: the legislative process; ministerial accountability; working practices (such as sitting hours); and the style and forms of proceedings. Between 1997 and 2003 the Committee published 19 reports starting with a report on the legislative process. However, to date, most of the reports have focused on the modernisation of working practices and the style and form of proceedings. Reports that deal with improving the effectiveness of ministerial accountability have been notably lacking. Consequently, the view of the Hansard Society that 'parliamentary reform has been one of improving the efficiency of Parliament, but not its effectiveness' appears just as valid three years on.",
keywords = "parliament, british politics, select committees, parliamentary democracy",
author = "Mark Shephard and R. Pelizzo and R. Staplehurst",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
series = "Series on contemporary issues in parliamentary development",
publisher = "World Bank Institute Publications",
pages = "40--46",
booktitle = "Legislatures and Oversight",

}

Shephard, M, Pelizzo, R (ed.) & Staplehurst, R (ed.) 2004, Administrative review and oversight: the experience of Westminster. in Legislatures and Oversight. Series on contemporary issues in parliamentary development, pp. 40-46.

Administrative review and oversight: the experience of Westminster. / Shephard, Mark; Pelizzo, R. (Editor); Staplehurst, R. (Editor).

Legislatures and Oversight. 2004. p. 40-46 (Series on contemporary issues in parliamentary development).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Administrative review and oversight: the experience of Westminster

AU - Shephard, Mark

A2 - Pelizzo, R.

A2 - Staplehurst, R.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Parliament has been left behind by far-reaching changes to the constitution, government and society in the past two decades. Despite recent innovations, particularly in the handling of legislation, the central question of Westminster's scrutiny of the executive has not been addressed. (Report of the Hansard Society Commission on Parliamentary Scrutiny, 2001: x) Prior to the Labour Party's election victory in 1997, Labour's manifesto promised an 'effective House of Commons' to be realised in large part through the creation of a special Select Committee with remit to review procedures in light of the 'need for modernisation'. Shortly after victory, Labour established a 'Modernisation Committee' chaired by the Leader of the Commons and with a remit to review four key areas: the legislative process; ministerial accountability; working practices (such as sitting hours); and the style and forms of proceedings. Between 1997 and 2003 the Committee published 19 reports starting with a report on the legislative process. However, to date, most of the reports have focused on the modernisation of working practices and the style and form of proceedings. Reports that deal with improving the effectiveness of ministerial accountability have been notably lacking. Consequently, the view of the Hansard Society that 'parliamentary reform has been one of improving the efficiency of Parliament, but not its effectiveness' appears just as valid three years on.

AB - Parliament has been left behind by far-reaching changes to the constitution, government and society in the past two decades. Despite recent innovations, particularly in the handling of legislation, the central question of Westminster's scrutiny of the executive has not been addressed. (Report of the Hansard Society Commission on Parliamentary Scrutiny, 2001: x) Prior to the Labour Party's election victory in 1997, Labour's manifesto promised an 'effective House of Commons' to be realised in large part through the creation of a special Select Committee with remit to review procedures in light of the 'need for modernisation'. Shortly after victory, Labour established a 'Modernisation Committee' chaired by the Leader of the Commons and with a remit to review four key areas: the legislative process; ministerial accountability; working practices (such as sitting hours); and the style and forms of proceedings. Between 1997 and 2003 the Committee published 19 reports starting with a report on the legislative process. However, to date, most of the reports have focused on the modernisation of working practices and the style and form of proceedings. Reports that deal with improving the effectiveness of ministerial accountability have been notably lacking. Consequently, the view of the Hansard Society that 'parliamentary reform has been one of improving the efficiency of Parliament, but not its effectiveness' appears just as valid three years on.

KW - parliament

KW - british politics

KW - select committees

KW - parliamentary democracy

UR - http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTPARLIAMENTARIANS/Resources/Legislatures_and_Oversight.pdf#search=%22Legislatures%20and%20Oversight%22

M3 - Chapter

T3 - Series on contemporary issues in parliamentary development

SP - 40

EP - 46

BT - Legislatures and Oversight

ER -

Shephard M, Pelizzo R, (ed.), Staplehurst R, (ed.). Administrative review and oversight: the experience of Westminster. In Legislatures and Oversight. 2004. p. 40-46. (Series on contemporary issues in parliamentary development).