Administrative reform and unintended consequences

an assessment of the EU Cohesion policy ‘audit explosion’

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of administrative reform in the Commission on policy implementation and outcomes through a study of EU Cohesion policy auditing. It argues that the growth in audit has taken a distinctively compliance-oriented form, in contrast with the performance audit model adopted in other countries that have embraced administrative modernization agendas. Further, the link between organizational efficiency and governance effectiveness postulated by other studies of Commission administrative reform is challenged, as the underlying audit and control problem in Cohesion policy – the high error rate – remain unresolved. Lastly, the proliferation in Cohesion policy auditing is
presented as a classic example of unintended consequences: originally intended to
improve policy performance and accountability, it has in fact undermined the strategic performance of the policy and is even threatening its sustainability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)746-765
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Volume18
Issue number5
Early online date11 Jul 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

group cohesion
audit
EU
auditing
reform
performance
policy implementation
proliferation
modernization
sustainability
governance
efficiency
responsibility

Keywords

  • eu cohesion policy
  • audit explosion
  • financial management
  • structural funds
  • administrative reform

Cite this

@article{c8c78e17518e4026b40183cfaf6de1cf,
title = "Administrative reform and unintended consequences: an assessment of the EU Cohesion policy ‘audit explosion’",
abstract = "This paper investigates the effects of administrative reform in the Commission on policy implementation and outcomes through a study of EU Cohesion policy auditing. It argues that the growth in audit has taken a distinctively compliance-oriented form, in contrast with the performance audit model adopted in other countries that have embraced administrative modernization agendas. Further, the link between organizational efficiency and governance effectiveness postulated by other studies of Commission administrative reform is challenged, as the underlying audit and control problem in Cohesion policy – the high error rate – remain unresolved. Lastly, the proliferation in Cohesion policy auditing is presented as a classic example of unintended consequences: originally intended to improve policy performance and accountability, it has in fact undermined the strategic performance of the policy and is even threatening its sustainability.",
keywords = "eu cohesion policy, audit explosion, financial management, structural funds, administrative reform",
author = "Carlos Mendez and John Bachtler",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1080/13501763.2011.586802",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "746--765",
journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",
issn = "1350-1763",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Administrative reform and unintended consequences

T2 - an assessment of the EU Cohesion policy ‘audit explosion’

AU - Mendez, Carlos

AU - Bachtler, John

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - This paper investigates the effects of administrative reform in the Commission on policy implementation and outcomes through a study of EU Cohesion policy auditing. It argues that the growth in audit has taken a distinctively compliance-oriented form, in contrast with the performance audit model adopted in other countries that have embraced administrative modernization agendas. Further, the link between organizational efficiency and governance effectiveness postulated by other studies of Commission administrative reform is challenged, as the underlying audit and control problem in Cohesion policy – the high error rate – remain unresolved. Lastly, the proliferation in Cohesion policy auditing is presented as a classic example of unintended consequences: originally intended to improve policy performance and accountability, it has in fact undermined the strategic performance of the policy and is even threatening its sustainability.

AB - This paper investigates the effects of administrative reform in the Commission on policy implementation and outcomes through a study of EU Cohesion policy auditing. It argues that the growth in audit has taken a distinctively compliance-oriented form, in contrast with the performance audit model adopted in other countries that have embraced administrative modernization agendas. Further, the link between organizational efficiency and governance effectiveness postulated by other studies of Commission administrative reform is challenged, as the underlying audit and control problem in Cohesion policy – the high error rate – remain unresolved. Lastly, the proliferation in Cohesion policy auditing is presented as a classic example of unintended consequences: originally intended to improve policy performance and accountability, it has in fact undermined the strategic performance of the policy and is even threatening its sustainability.

KW - eu cohesion policy

KW - audit explosion

KW - financial management

KW - structural funds

KW - administrative reform

U2 - 10.1080/13501763.2011.586802

DO - 10.1080/13501763.2011.586802

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 746

EP - 765

JO - Journal of European Public Policy

JF - Journal of European Public Policy

SN - 1350-1763

IS - 5

ER -