Addressing the social, cognitive and emotional needs of children: the case for dynamic assessment

Fraser Lauchlan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the extent to which the use of psychological assessment addresses the social, emotional and cognitive needs of children experiencing difficulties with learning. Evidence in favour of a curriculum-based assessment (CBA) approach is presented, and the advantages and disadvantages are evaluated. This paper argues that CBA does not stand up well to the demand for a more ecological approach to assessment that considers the social and
emotional needs of children. CBA can often be too task oriented, and more importantly fails to consider an interactive environment in which to assess the child. Finally, the underlying theory of CBA on behavioural approaches to learning neglects a focus on the cognitive and meta-cognitive aspects of learning. Arguments in favour of dynamic assessment are offered as an approach which does consider such aspects of learning. Nevertheless, the appropriateness
and effectiveness of CBA and dynamic assessment can only truly be considered in light of the purposes of each individual assessment. Different approaches to psychological assessment could be used in different circumstances, therefore, the ‘why?’ of assessment (Frederickson, Wright & Webster, 1991) should receive careful consideration before the issue of ‘which approach is best?’.
LanguageEnglish
Pages4-18
Number of pages14
JournalEducational and Child Psychology
Volume18
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Learning
Psychology

Keywords

  • children
  • social needs
  • cognitive needs
  • educational psychology

Cite this

@article{b0aecbcab16641ad863159a460938160,
title = "Addressing the social, cognitive and emotional needs of children: the case for dynamic assessment",
abstract = "This paper examines the extent to which the use of psychological assessment addresses the social, emotional and cognitive needs of children experiencing difficulties with learning. Evidence in favour of a curriculum-based assessment (CBA) approach is presented, and the advantages and disadvantages are evaluated. This paper argues that CBA does not stand up well to the demand for a more ecological approach to assessment that considers the social andemotional needs of children. CBA can often be too task oriented, and more importantly fails to consider an interactive environment in which to assess the child. Finally, the underlying theory of CBA on behavioural approaches to learning neglects a focus on the cognitive and meta-cognitive aspects of learning. Arguments in favour of dynamic assessment are offered as an approach which does consider such aspects of learning. Nevertheless, the appropriatenessand effectiveness of CBA and dynamic assessment can only truly be considered in light of the purposes of each individual assessment. Different approaches to psychological assessment could be used in different circumstances, therefore, the ‘why?’ of assessment (Frederickson, Wright & Webster, 1991) should receive careful consideration before the issue of ‘which approach is best?’.",
keywords = "children, social needs, cognitive needs, educational psychology",
author = "Fraser Lauchlan",
year = "2001",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "4--18",
journal = "Educational and Child Psychology",
issn = "0267-1611",
number = "4",

}

Addressing the social, cognitive and emotional needs of children: the case for dynamic assessment. / Lauchlan, Fraser.

In: Educational and Child Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2001, p. 4-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Addressing the social, cognitive and emotional needs of children: the case for dynamic assessment

AU - Lauchlan, Fraser

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - This paper examines the extent to which the use of psychological assessment addresses the social, emotional and cognitive needs of children experiencing difficulties with learning. Evidence in favour of a curriculum-based assessment (CBA) approach is presented, and the advantages and disadvantages are evaluated. This paper argues that CBA does not stand up well to the demand for a more ecological approach to assessment that considers the social andemotional needs of children. CBA can often be too task oriented, and more importantly fails to consider an interactive environment in which to assess the child. Finally, the underlying theory of CBA on behavioural approaches to learning neglects a focus on the cognitive and meta-cognitive aspects of learning. Arguments in favour of dynamic assessment are offered as an approach which does consider such aspects of learning. Nevertheless, the appropriatenessand effectiveness of CBA and dynamic assessment can only truly be considered in light of the purposes of each individual assessment. Different approaches to psychological assessment could be used in different circumstances, therefore, the ‘why?’ of assessment (Frederickson, Wright & Webster, 1991) should receive careful consideration before the issue of ‘which approach is best?’.

AB - This paper examines the extent to which the use of psychological assessment addresses the social, emotional and cognitive needs of children experiencing difficulties with learning. Evidence in favour of a curriculum-based assessment (CBA) approach is presented, and the advantages and disadvantages are evaluated. This paper argues that CBA does not stand up well to the demand for a more ecological approach to assessment that considers the social andemotional needs of children. CBA can often be too task oriented, and more importantly fails to consider an interactive environment in which to assess the child. Finally, the underlying theory of CBA on behavioural approaches to learning neglects a focus on the cognitive and meta-cognitive aspects of learning. Arguments in favour of dynamic assessment are offered as an approach which does consider such aspects of learning. Nevertheless, the appropriatenessand effectiveness of CBA and dynamic assessment can only truly be considered in light of the purposes of each individual assessment. Different approaches to psychological assessment could be used in different circumstances, therefore, the ‘why?’ of assessment (Frederickson, Wright & Webster, 1991) should receive careful consideration before the issue of ‘which approach is best?’.

KW - children

KW - social needs

KW - cognitive needs

KW - educational psychology

UR - http://decp.bps.org.uk/

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 4

EP - 18

JO - Educational and Child Psychology

T2 - Educational and Child Psychology

JF - Educational and Child Psychology

SN - 0267-1611

IS - 4

ER -