Addressing path dependency in the capabilities approach: historicism and foresight meet on the road less travelled

Swapnesh K. Masrani, Peter McKiernan

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The chapter challenges the commonly held notion in the capabilities approach, arising out of over emphasis on path dependency, that capability development follows a single path dependent route, which is determined positively by interrelatedness among existing technologies. It queries the fascination especially within the empirical literature with examining a single, successful choice. The chapter argues, like Penrose (1959) and Hamel and Prahalad (1994), that a firm seldom considers only one strategic capability development route. Often, a route is chosen from a bounded option set, anchored by the ‘do- nothing’ default. This is supported by empirical case evidence, which also suggests that, in some instances, technological interrelatedness is not a major factor influencing the development of capabilities from the available options.
    LanguageEnglish
    Title of host publicationHandbook of Research on Strategy and Foresight
    EditorsLaura Anna Constanzo, Robert Bradley Mackay
    Place of PublicationCheltenham, UK
    Chapter27
    Pages485-505
    Number of pages21
    Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2009

    Fingerprint

    Foresight
    Capability approach
    Roads
    Path dependency
    Strategic capabilities
    Query
    Influencing factors
    Penrose

    Keywords

    • path dependency
    • Dundee jute industry
    • organisational foresight

    Cite this

    Masrani, S. K., & McKiernan, P. (2009). Addressing path dependency in the capabilities approach: historicism and foresight meet on the road less travelled. In L. A. Constanzo, & R. B. Mackay (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Strategy and Foresight (pp. 485-505). Cheltenham, UK.
    Masrani, Swapnesh K. ; McKiernan, Peter. / Addressing path dependency in the capabilities approach : historicism and foresight meet on the road less travelled. Handbook of Research on Strategy and Foresight. editor / Laura Anna Constanzo ; Robert Bradley Mackay. Cheltenham, UK, 2009. pp. 485-505
    @inbook{00c4bb1688c84b7bb4e48f19a3b58ac4,
    title = "Addressing path dependency in the capabilities approach: historicism and foresight meet on the road less travelled",
    abstract = "The chapter challenges the commonly held notion in the capabilities approach, arising out of over emphasis on path dependency, that capability development follows a single path dependent route, which is determined positively by interrelatedness among existing technologies. It queries the fascination especially within the empirical literature with examining a single, successful choice. The chapter argues, like Penrose (1959) and Hamel and Prahalad (1994), that a firm seldom considers only one strategic capability development route. Often, a route is chosen from a bounded option set, anchored by the ‘do- nothing’ default. This is supported by empirical case evidence, which also suggests that, in some instances, technological interrelatedness is not a major factor influencing the development of capabilities from the available options.",
    keywords = "path dependency, Dundee jute industry, organisational foresight",
    author = "Masrani, {Swapnesh K.} and Peter McKiernan",
    note = "This is a draft chapter. The final version is available in the Handbook of Research on Strategy and Foresight edited by L.A. Constanzo and R.B. MacKay, published in 2009, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. The material cannot be used for any other purpose without further permission of the publisher, and is for private use only.",
    year = "2009",
    month = "3",
    day = "31",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-1-84542-963-8",
    pages = "485--505",
    editor = "Constanzo, {Laura Anna} and Mackay, {Robert Bradley}",
    booktitle = "Handbook of Research on Strategy and Foresight",

    }

    Masrani, SK & McKiernan, P 2009, Addressing path dependency in the capabilities approach: historicism and foresight meet on the road less travelled. in LA Constanzo & RB Mackay (eds), Handbook of Research on Strategy and Foresight. Cheltenham, UK, pp. 485-505.

    Addressing path dependency in the capabilities approach : historicism and foresight meet on the road less travelled. / Masrani, Swapnesh K.; McKiernan, Peter.

    Handbook of Research on Strategy and Foresight. ed. / Laura Anna Constanzo; Robert Bradley Mackay. Cheltenham, UK, 2009. p. 485-505.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Addressing path dependency in the capabilities approach

    T2 - historicism and foresight meet on the road less travelled

    AU - Masrani, Swapnesh K.

    AU - McKiernan, Peter

    N1 - This is a draft chapter. The final version is available in the Handbook of Research on Strategy and Foresight edited by L.A. Constanzo and R.B. MacKay, published in 2009, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. The material cannot be used for any other purpose without further permission of the publisher, and is for private use only.

    PY - 2009/3/31

    Y1 - 2009/3/31

    N2 - The chapter challenges the commonly held notion in the capabilities approach, arising out of over emphasis on path dependency, that capability development follows a single path dependent route, which is determined positively by interrelatedness among existing technologies. It queries the fascination especially within the empirical literature with examining a single, successful choice. The chapter argues, like Penrose (1959) and Hamel and Prahalad (1994), that a firm seldom considers only one strategic capability development route. Often, a route is chosen from a bounded option set, anchored by the ‘do- nothing’ default. This is supported by empirical case evidence, which also suggests that, in some instances, technological interrelatedness is not a major factor influencing the development of capabilities from the available options.

    AB - The chapter challenges the commonly held notion in the capabilities approach, arising out of over emphasis on path dependency, that capability development follows a single path dependent route, which is determined positively by interrelatedness among existing technologies. It queries the fascination especially within the empirical literature with examining a single, successful choice. The chapter argues, like Penrose (1959) and Hamel and Prahalad (1994), that a firm seldom considers only one strategic capability development route. Often, a route is chosen from a bounded option set, anchored by the ‘do- nothing’ default. This is supported by empirical case evidence, which also suggests that, in some instances, technological interrelatedness is not a major factor influencing the development of capabilities from the available options.

    KW - path dependency

    KW - Dundee jute industry

    KW - organisational foresight

    UR - https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/handbook-of-research-on-strategy-and-foresight

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 978-1-84542-963-8

    SP - 485

    EP - 505

    BT - Handbook of Research on Strategy and Foresight

    A2 - Constanzo, Laura Anna

    A2 - Mackay, Robert Bradley

    CY - Cheltenham, UK

    ER -

    Masrani SK, McKiernan P. Addressing path dependency in the capabilities approach: historicism and foresight meet on the road less travelled. In Constanzo LA, Mackay RB, editors, Handbook of Research on Strategy and Foresight. Cheltenham, UK. 2009. p. 485-505