Actor alignments in the European Union before and after enlargement

Robert Thomson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What impact has the 2004 enlargement had on legislative decision making in the European Union (EU)? This study answers this question by examining the controversies raised by a broad selection of legislative proposals from before and after the 2004 enlargement. The analyses focus on the alignments of decision-making actors found on those controversies. Member State representatives, the European Commission and the European Parliament vary considerably in the positions they take on controversial issues before and after enlargement. Consistent patterns in actor alignments are found for only a minority of controversial issues. To the extent that consistent patterns are found, the most common involve differences in the positions of Northern and Southern Member States and old and new Member States. The North-South alignment was more common in the EU-15 and reflected Northern Member States' preference for low levels of regulatory intervention. The new-old alignment that has been evident in the post-2004 EU reflects new Member States' preference for higher levels of financial subsidies. This study argues that the persistent diversity in actor alignments contributes to the EU's capacity to cope with enlargement.
LanguageEnglish
Pages756-781
Number of pages26
JournalEuropean Journal of Political Research
Volume48
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

decision making
European Parliament
European Commission
subsidy
EU
minority

Keywords

  • European Union
  • legislative decision making
  • European member states

Cite this

@article{915e301210714e20b6f0bbee2f038a22,
title = "Actor alignments in the European Union before and after enlargement",
abstract = "What impact has the 2004 enlargement had on legislative decision making in the European Union (EU)? This study answers this question by examining the controversies raised by a broad selection of legislative proposals from before and after the 2004 enlargement. The analyses focus on the alignments of decision-making actors found on those controversies. Member State representatives, the European Commission and the European Parliament vary considerably in the positions they take on controversial issues before and after enlargement. Consistent patterns in actor alignments are found for only a minority of controversial issues. To the extent that consistent patterns are found, the most common involve differences in the positions of Northern and Southern Member States and old and new Member States. The North-South alignment was more common in the EU-15 and reflected Northern Member States' preference for low levels of regulatory intervention. The new-old alignment that has been evident in the post-2004 EU reflects new Member States' preference for higher levels of financial subsidies. This study argues that the persistent diversity in actor alignments contributes to the EU's capacity to cope with enlargement.",
keywords = "European Union, legislative decision making, European member states",
author = "Robert Thomson",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00848.x",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "756--781",
journal = "European Journal of Political Research",
issn = "0304-4130",
number = "6",

}

Actor alignments in the European Union before and after enlargement. / Thomson, Robert.

In: European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 48, No. 6, 10.2009, p. 756-781.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Actor alignments in the European Union before and after enlargement

AU - Thomson, Robert

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - What impact has the 2004 enlargement had on legislative decision making in the European Union (EU)? This study answers this question by examining the controversies raised by a broad selection of legislative proposals from before and after the 2004 enlargement. The analyses focus on the alignments of decision-making actors found on those controversies. Member State representatives, the European Commission and the European Parliament vary considerably in the positions they take on controversial issues before and after enlargement. Consistent patterns in actor alignments are found for only a minority of controversial issues. To the extent that consistent patterns are found, the most common involve differences in the positions of Northern and Southern Member States and old and new Member States. The North-South alignment was more common in the EU-15 and reflected Northern Member States' preference for low levels of regulatory intervention. The new-old alignment that has been evident in the post-2004 EU reflects new Member States' preference for higher levels of financial subsidies. This study argues that the persistent diversity in actor alignments contributes to the EU's capacity to cope with enlargement.

AB - What impact has the 2004 enlargement had on legislative decision making in the European Union (EU)? This study answers this question by examining the controversies raised by a broad selection of legislative proposals from before and after the 2004 enlargement. The analyses focus on the alignments of decision-making actors found on those controversies. Member State representatives, the European Commission and the European Parliament vary considerably in the positions they take on controversial issues before and after enlargement. Consistent patterns in actor alignments are found for only a minority of controversial issues. To the extent that consistent patterns are found, the most common involve differences in the positions of Northern and Southern Member States and old and new Member States. The North-South alignment was more common in the EU-15 and reflected Northern Member States' preference for low levels of regulatory intervention. The new-old alignment that has been evident in the post-2004 EU reflects new Member States' preference for higher levels of financial subsidies. This study argues that the persistent diversity in actor alignments contributes to the EU's capacity to cope with enlargement.

KW - European Union

KW - legislative decision making

KW - European member states

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00848.x/abstract

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1475-6765

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00848.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00848.x

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 756

EP - 781

JO - European Journal of Political Research

T2 - European Journal of Political Research

JF - European Journal of Political Research

SN - 0304-4130

IS - 6

ER -