Actor alignments in European Union decision making

Robert Thomson, Jovanka Boerefijn, Frans Stokman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What is the structure of the political space in which decision-making actors operate in the European Union? Are there consistent alignments of actors? This article addresses these questions by examining a new data set containing information on the preferences of the Commission, the Member States and the European Parliament on 174 issues raised during talks on 70 recent Commission proposals. To a limited extent, the preference alignments can be described in terms of two underlying dimensions. However, these conceptual structures are weak. The first dimension is defined by the position of the European Commission and European Parliament at one end and the reference point at the other; the second dimension by a division between the Northern and Southern Member States. The meaning of these dimensions is investigated by identifying the substance of the policy issues on which these actor alignments are found. The Commission-reference point dimension is interpreted in terms of policy change rather than, as has previously been suggested, the level of integration. The North-South dimension corresponds to diverging views on the use of regulatory versus market-based solutions to policy problems. The weakness of these conceptual structures, it is argued, is due to the sectoral nature of European Union decision making. This lack of structure is likely to have a positive effect on support for the system among its members, since the benign effects of ideology at the national level cannot be expected to apply at the European Union level.
LanguageEnglish
Pages237–261
Number of pages25
JournalEuropean Journal of Political Research
Volume43
Issue number2
Early online date25 Feb 2004
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2004

Fingerprint

decision making
European Parliament
European Commission
ideology
lack
market

Keywords

  • European Union decision making
  • European Union
  • European Parliament

Cite this

Thomson, Robert ; Boerefijn, Jovanka ; Stokman, Frans. / Actor alignments in European Union decision making. In: European Journal of Political Research. 2004 ; Vol. 43, No. 2. pp. 237–261.
@article{4f0b1caf4b0f4d0d81aa517285b3d689,
title = "Actor alignments in European Union decision making",
abstract = "What is the structure of the political space in which decision-making actors operate in the European Union? Are there consistent alignments of actors? This article addresses these questions by examining a new data set containing information on the preferences of the Commission, the Member States and the European Parliament on 174 issues raised during talks on 70 recent Commission proposals. To a limited extent, the preference alignments can be described in terms of two underlying dimensions. However, these conceptual structures are weak. The first dimension is defined by the position of the European Commission and European Parliament at one end and the reference point at the other; the second dimension by a division between the Northern and Southern Member States. The meaning of these dimensions is investigated by identifying the substance of the policy issues on which these actor alignments are found. The Commission-reference point dimension is interpreted in terms of policy change rather than, as has previously been suggested, the level of integration. The North-South dimension corresponds to diverging views on the use of regulatory versus market-based solutions to policy problems. The weakness of these conceptual structures, it is argued, is due to the sectoral nature of European Union decision making. This lack of structure is likely to have a positive effect on support for the system among its members, since the benign effects of ideology at the national level cannot be expected to apply at the European Union level.",
keywords = "European Union decision making, European Union, European Parliament",
author = "Robert Thomson and Jovanka Boerefijn and Frans Stokman",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00153.x",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "237–261",
journal = "European Journal of Political Research",
issn = "0304-4130",
number = "2",

}

Actor alignments in European Union decision making. / Thomson, Robert; Boerefijn, Jovanka; Stokman, Frans.

In: European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 43, No. 2, 03.2004, p. 237–261.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Actor alignments in European Union decision making

AU - Thomson, Robert

AU - Boerefijn, Jovanka

AU - Stokman, Frans

PY - 2004/3

Y1 - 2004/3

N2 - What is the structure of the political space in which decision-making actors operate in the European Union? Are there consistent alignments of actors? This article addresses these questions by examining a new data set containing information on the preferences of the Commission, the Member States and the European Parliament on 174 issues raised during talks on 70 recent Commission proposals. To a limited extent, the preference alignments can be described in terms of two underlying dimensions. However, these conceptual structures are weak. The first dimension is defined by the position of the European Commission and European Parliament at one end and the reference point at the other; the second dimension by a division between the Northern and Southern Member States. The meaning of these dimensions is investigated by identifying the substance of the policy issues on which these actor alignments are found. The Commission-reference point dimension is interpreted in terms of policy change rather than, as has previously been suggested, the level of integration. The North-South dimension corresponds to diverging views on the use of regulatory versus market-based solutions to policy problems. The weakness of these conceptual structures, it is argued, is due to the sectoral nature of European Union decision making. This lack of structure is likely to have a positive effect on support for the system among its members, since the benign effects of ideology at the national level cannot be expected to apply at the European Union level.

AB - What is the structure of the political space in which decision-making actors operate in the European Union? Are there consistent alignments of actors? This article addresses these questions by examining a new data set containing information on the preferences of the Commission, the Member States and the European Parliament on 174 issues raised during talks on 70 recent Commission proposals. To a limited extent, the preference alignments can be described in terms of two underlying dimensions. However, these conceptual structures are weak. The first dimension is defined by the position of the European Commission and European Parliament at one end and the reference point at the other; the second dimension by a division between the Northern and Southern Member States. The meaning of these dimensions is investigated by identifying the substance of the policy issues on which these actor alignments are found. The Commission-reference point dimension is interpreted in terms of policy change rather than, as has previously been suggested, the level of integration. The North-South dimension corresponds to diverging views on the use of regulatory versus market-based solutions to policy problems. The weakness of these conceptual structures, it is argued, is due to the sectoral nature of European Union decision making. This lack of structure is likely to have a positive effect on support for the system among its members, since the benign effects of ideology at the national level cannot be expected to apply at the European Union level.

KW - European Union decision making

KW - European Union

KW - European Parliament

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00153.x/full

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00153.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00153.x

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 237

EP - 261

JO - European Journal of Political Research

T2 - European Journal of Political Research

JF - European Journal of Political Research

SN - 0304-4130

IS - 2

ER -