Active controllers or wealthy rentiers?

large shareholders in victorian public companies', business history review

Graeme G. Acheson, Gareth Campbell, John D Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article addresses the issue of whether large shareholders in Victorian public companies were active in the control of companies or were simply wealthy rentiers. Using ownership records for 890 firm-years, we examine the control rights, socio-occupational background, and wealth of large shareholders. We find that many large shareholders had limited voting rights and neither they nor family members were directors. This implies that the majority of public companies in the second half of the nineteenth century cannot be characterized as family companies and that large shareholders are better viewed as wealthy gentlemen capitalists rather than entrepreneurs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)661-691
Number of pages31
JournalBusiness History Review
Volume89
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Oct 2015

Fingerprint

Controller
Large shareholders
Business history
Victorian Era
Business History
Ownership
Voting
Wealth
Entrepreneurs
Voting rights
Family companies
Control rights

Keywords

  • active controllers
  • large shareholders
  • victorian public companies

Cite this

@article{18a3bc5c80c74acd8079174330cebcf4,
title = "Active controllers or wealthy rentiers?: large shareholders in victorian public companies', business history review",
abstract = "This article addresses the issue of whether large shareholders in Victorian public companies were active in the control of companies or were simply wealthy rentiers. Using ownership records for 890 firm-years, we examine the control rights, socio-occupational background, and wealth of large shareholders. We find that many large shareholders had limited voting rights and neither they nor family members were directors. This implies that the majority of public companies in the second half of the nineteenth century cannot be characterized as family companies and that large shareholders are better viewed as wealthy gentlemen capitalists rather than entrepreneurs.",
keywords = "active controllers, large shareholders, victorian public companies",
author = "Acheson, {Graeme G.} and Gareth Campbell and Turner, {John D}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "29",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007680515001026",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "661--691",
journal = "Business History Review",
issn = "0007-6805",
number = "4",

}

Active controllers or wealthy rentiers? large shareholders in victorian public companies', business history review. / Acheson, Graeme G.; Campbell, Gareth; Turner, John D.

In: Business History Review, Vol. 89, No. 4, 29.10.2015, p. 661-691.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Active controllers or wealthy rentiers?

T2 - large shareholders in victorian public companies', business history review

AU - Acheson, Graeme G.

AU - Campbell, Gareth

AU - Turner, John D

PY - 2015/10/29

Y1 - 2015/10/29

N2 - This article addresses the issue of whether large shareholders in Victorian public companies were active in the control of companies or were simply wealthy rentiers. Using ownership records for 890 firm-years, we examine the control rights, socio-occupational background, and wealth of large shareholders. We find that many large shareholders had limited voting rights and neither they nor family members were directors. This implies that the majority of public companies in the second half of the nineteenth century cannot be characterized as family companies and that large shareholders are better viewed as wealthy gentlemen capitalists rather than entrepreneurs.

AB - This article addresses the issue of whether large shareholders in Victorian public companies were active in the control of companies or were simply wealthy rentiers. Using ownership records for 890 firm-years, we examine the control rights, socio-occupational background, and wealth of large shareholders. We find that many large shareholders had limited voting rights and neither they nor family members were directors. This implies that the majority of public companies in the second half of the nineteenth century cannot be characterized as family companies and that large shareholders are better viewed as wealthy gentlemen capitalists rather than entrepreneurs.

KW - active controllers

KW - large shareholders

KW - victorian public companies

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007680515001026

DO - https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007680515001026

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 661

EP - 691

JO - Business History Review

JF - Business History Review

SN - 0007-6805

IS - 4

ER -