Active commuting to school: how far is too far?

Norah M Nelson, Eimear Foley, Donal J O'Gorman, Niall M Moyna, Catherine B Woods

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    111 Citations (Scopus)
    5 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Walking and cycling to school provide a convenient opportunity to incorporate physical activity into an adolescent's daily routine. School proximity to residential homes has been identified as an important determinant of active commuting among children. The purpose of this study is to identify if distance is a barrier to active commuting among adolescents, and if there is a criterion distance above which adolescents choose not to walk or cycle. Data was collected in 2003-05 from a cross-sectional cohort of 15-17 yr old adolescents in 61 post primary schools in Ireland. Participants self-reported distance, mode of transport to school and barriers to active commuting. Trained researchers took physical measurements of height and weight. The relation between mode of transport, gender and population density was examined. Distance was entered into a bivariate logistic regression model to predict mode choice, controlling for gender, population density socio-economic status and school clusters. Of the 4013 adolescents who participated (48.1% female, mean age 16.02 ± 0.661), one third walked or cycled to school. A higher proportion of males than females commuted actively (41.0 vs. 33.8%, χ2 (1) = 22.21, p < 0.001, r = -0.074). Adolescents living in more densely populated areas had greater odds of active commuting than those in the most sparsely populated areas (χ2 (df = 3) = 839.64, p < 0.001). In each density category, active commuters travelled shorter distances to school. After controlling for gender and population density, a 1-mile increase in distance decreased the odds of active commuting by 71% (χ2 (df = 1) = 2591.86, p < 0.001). The majority of walkers lived within 1.5 miles and cyclists within 2.5 miles. Over 90% of adolescents who perceived distance as a barrier to active commuting lived further than 2.5 miles from school. Distance is an important perceived barrier to active commuting and a predictor of mode choice among adolescents. Distances within 2.5 miles are achievable for adolescent walkers and cyclists. Alternative strategies for increasing physical activity are required for individuals living outside of this criterion.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages9
    JournalInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
    Volume5
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 8 Jan 2008

    Fingerprint

    Population Density
    Walkers
    Logistic Models
    Exercise
    Ireland
    Walking
    Economics
    Research Personnel
    Weights and Measures

    Keywords

    • walking
    • active commuting
    • adolescents
    • distance to school

    Cite this

    Nelson, Norah M ; Foley, Eimear ; O'Gorman, Donal J ; Moyna, Niall M ; Woods, Catherine B. / Active commuting to school : how far is too far?. In: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2008 ; Vol. 5, No. 1.
    @article{a0fbeb2eda794aca8acd0a82dd33cb0f,
    title = "Active commuting to school: how far is too far?",
    abstract = "Walking and cycling to school provide a convenient opportunity to incorporate physical activity into an adolescent's daily routine. School proximity to residential homes has been identified as an important determinant of active commuting among children. The purpose of this study is to identify if distance is a barrier to active commuting among adolescents, and if there is a criterion distance above which adolescents choose not to walk or cycle. Data was collected in 2003-05 from a cross-sectional cohort of 15-17 yr old adolescents in 61 post primary schools in Ireland. Participants self-reported distance, mode of transport to school and barriers to active commuting. Trained researchers took physical measurements of height and weight. The relation between mode of transport, gender and population density was examined. Distance was entered into a bivariate logistic regression model to predict mode choice, controlling for gender, population density socio-economic status and school clusters. Of the 4013 adolescents who participated (48.1{\%} female, mean age 16.02 ± 0.661), one third walked or cycled to school. A higher proportion of males than females commuted actively (41.0 vs. 33.8{\%}, χ2 (1) = 22.21, p < 0.001, r = -0.074). Adolescents living in more densely populated areas had greater odds of active commuting than those in the most sparsely populated areas (χ2 (df = 3) = 839.64, p < 0.001). In each density category, active commuters travelled shorter distances to school. After controlling for gender and population density, a 1-mile increase in distance decreased the odds of active commuting by 71{\%} (χ2 (df = 1) = 2591.86, p < 0.001). The majority of walkers lived within 1.5 miles and cyclists within 2.5 miles. Over 90{\%} of adolescents who perceived distance as a barrier to active commuting lived further than 2.5 miles from school. Distance is an important perceived barrier to active commuting and a predictor of mode choice among adolescents. Distances within 2.5 miles are achievable for adolescent walkers and cyclists. Alternative strategies for increasing physical activity are required for individuals living outside of this criterion.",
    keywords = "walking, active commuting, adolescents, distance to school",
    author = "Nelson, {Norah M} and Eimear Foley and O'Gorman, {Donal J} and Moyna, {Niall M} and Woods, {Catherine B}",
    year = "2008",
    month = "1",
    day = "8",
    doi = "10.1186/1479-5868-5-1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "5",
    journal = "International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity",
    issn = "1479-5868",
    number = "1",

    }

    Active commuting to school : how far is too far? / Nelson, Norah M; Foley, Eimear; O'Gorman, Donal J; Moyna, Niall M; Woods, Catherine B.

    In: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol. 5, No. 1, 08.01.2008.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Active commuting to school

    T2 - how far is too far?

    AU - Nelson, Norah M

    AU - Foley, Eimear

    AU - O'Gorman, Donal J

    AU - Moyna, Niall M

    AU - Woods, Catherine B

    PY - 2008/1/8

    Y1 - 2008/1/8

    N2 - Walking and cycling to school provide a convenient opportunity to incorporate physical activity into an adolescent's daily routine. School proximity to residential homes has been identified as an important determinant of active commuting among children. The purpose of this study is to identify if distance is a barrier to active commuting among adolescents, and if there is a criterion distance above which adolescents choose not to walk or cycle. Data was collected in 2003-05 from a cross-sectional cohort of 15-17 yr old adolescents in 61 post primary schools in Ireland. Participants self-reported distance, mode of transport to school and barriers to active commuting. Trained researchers took physical measurements of height and weight. The relation between mode of transport, gender and population density was examined. Distance was entered into a bivariate logistic regression model to predict mode choice, controlling for gender, population density socio-economic status and school clusters. Of the 4013 adolescents who participated (48.1% female, mean age 16.02 ± 0.661), one third walked or cycled to school. A higher proportion of males than females commuted actively (41.0 vs. 33.8%, χ2 (1) = 22.21, p < 0.001, r = -0.074). Adolescents living in more densely populated areas had greater odds of active commuting than those in the most sparsely populated areas (χ2 (df = 3) = 839.64, p < 0.001). In each density category, active commuters travelled shorter distances to school. After controlling for gender and population density, a 1-mile increase in distance decreased the odds of active commuting by 71% (χ2 (df = 1) = 2591.86, p < 0.001). The majority of walkers lived within 1.5 miles and cyclists within 2.5 miles. Over 90% of adolescents who perceived distance as a barrier to active commuting lived further than 2.5 miles from school. Distance is an important perceived barrier to active commuting and a predictor of mode choice among adolescents. Distances within 2.5 miles are achievable for adolescent walkers and cyclists. Alternative strategies for increasing physical activity are required for individuals living outside of this criterion.

    AB - Walking and cycling to school provide a convenient opportunity to incorporate physical activity into an adolescent's daily routine. School proximity to residential homes has been identified as an important determinant of active commuting among children. The purpose of this study is to identify if distance is a barrier to active commuting among adolescents, and if there is a criterion distance above which adolescents choose not to walk or cycle. Data was collected in 2003-05 from a cross-sectional cohort of 15-17 yr old adolescents in 61 post primary schools in Ireland. Participants self-reported distance, mode of transport to school and barriers to active commuting. Trained researchers took physical measurements of height and weight. The relation between mode of transport, gender and population density was examined. Distance was entered into a bivariate logistic regression model to predict mode choice, controlling for gender, population density socio-economic status and school clusters. Of the 4013 adolescents who participated (48.1% female, mean age 16.02 ± 0.661), one third walked or cycled to school. A higher proportion of males than females commuted actively (41.0 vs. 33.8%, χ2 (1) = 22.21, p < 0.001, r = -0.074). Adolescents living in more densely populated areas had greater odds of active commuting than those in the most sparsely populated areas (χ2 (df = 3) = 839.64, p < 0.001). In each density category, active commuters travelled shorter distances to school. After controlling for gender and population density, a 1-mile increase in distance decreased the odds of active commuting by 71% (χ2 (df = 1) = 2591.86, p < 0.001). The majority of walkers lived within 1.5 miles and cyclists within 2.5 miles. Over 90% of adolescents who perceived distance as a barrier to active commuting lived further than 2.5 miles from school. Distance is an important perceived barrier to active commuting and a predictor of mode choice among adolescents. Distances within 2.5 miles are achievable for adolescent walkers and cyclists. Alternative strategies for increasing physical activity are required for individuals living outside of this criterion.

    KW - walking

    KW - active commuting

    KW - adolescents

    KW - distance to school

    U2 - 10.1186/1479-5868-5-1

    DO - 10.1186/1479-5868-5-1

    M3 - Article

    VL - 5

    JO - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

    JF - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

    SN - 1479-5868

    IS - 1

    ER -