Acting up or acting out? Unlocking children's talk in literature circles

C. Pearson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    It is generally accepted that talk enriches children's interpretations of texts in literature circle discussions. However, the nature of that talk and exactly how it facilitates interpretation of texts has not been much analysed. This article describes some work undertaken with a class of Scottish children, aged 9-10, to introduce them to the idea of literature circles. The literature circle discussions were then recorded and analysed. The purpose of the project was to record the kinds of exchanges, chains of comment and range of discourses and voices that children used when talking among themselves, and to reflect on their function and value. It was found that a lot of the talk was exploratory though not always in the sense proposed by Mercer. In his terms much was 'cumulative'. Some talk veered towards anecdotal chat. The children also frequently put on voices not their own, mimicking characters in the story they were reading, and other people they knew. These forms of talk are not always encouraged in the classroom, their effectiveness for learning being in doubt. This article argues that cumulative talk, the telling of anecdotes and the performing of different characters' voices all have a useful function in discussions of books: they can encourage engagement, be helpful in bringing texts to life and advance children's thinking about literature.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages3-11
    Number of pages8
    JournalLiteracy
    Volume44
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    interpretation
    chat
    literature
    Literature Circles
    classroom
    discourse
    learning
    Values
    Anecdote
    Discourse

    Keywords

    • literature circles • anecdote • voices • acting

    Cite this

    Pearson, C. / Acting up or acting out? Unlocking children's talk in literature circles. In: Literacy. 2010 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 3-11.
    @article{624aef1c7ab048329ce56b0dcf70f679,
    title = "Acting up or acting out? Unlocking children's talk in literature circles",
    abstract = "It is generally accepted that talk enriches children's interpretations of texts in literature circle discussions. However, the nature of that talk and exactly how it facilitates interpretation of texts has not been much analysed. This article describes some work undertaken with a class of Scottish children, aged 9-10, to introduce them to the idea of literature circles. The literature circle discussions were then recorded and analysed. The purpose of the project was to record the kinds of exchanges, chains of comment and range of discourses and voices that children used when talking among themselves, and to reflect on their function and value. It was found that a lot of the talk was exploratory though not always in the sense proposed by Mercer. In his terms much was 'cumulative'. Some talk veered towards anecdotal chat. The children also frequently put on voices not their own, mimicking characters in the story they were reading, and other people they knew. These forms of talk are not always encouraged in the classroom, their effectiveness for learning being in doubt. This article argues that cumulative talk, the telling of anecdotes and the performing of different characters' voices all have a useful function in discussions of books: they can encourage engagement, be helpful in bringing texts to life and advance children's thinking about literature.",
    keywords = "literature circles • anecdote • voices • acting",
    author = "C. Pearson",
    year = "2010",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1741-4369.2010.00543.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "44",
    pages = "3--11",
    journal = "Literacy",
    issn = "1741-4350",
    number = "1",

    }

    Acting up or acting out? Unlocking children's talk in literature circles. / Pearson, C.

    In: Literacy, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2010, p. 3-11.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Acting up or acting out? Unlocking children's talk in literature circles

    AU - Pearson, C.

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - It is generally accepted that talk enriches children's interpretations of texts in literature circle discussions. However, the nature of that talk and exactly how it facilitates interpretation of texts has not been much analysed. This article describes some work undertaken with a class of Scottish children, aged 9-10, to introduce them to the idea of literature circles. The literature circle discussions were then recorded and analysed. The purpose of the project was to record the kinds of exchanges, chains of comment and range of discourses and voices that children used when talking among themselves, and to reflect on their function and value. It was found that a lot of the talk was exploratory though not always in the sense proposed by Mercer. In his terms much was 'cumulative'. Some talk veered towards anecdotal chat. The children also frequently put on voices not their own, mimicking characters in the story they were reading, and other people they knew. These forms of talk are not always encouraged in the classroom, their effectiveness for learning being in doubt. This article argues that cumulative talk, the telling of anecdotes and the performing of different characters' voices all have a useful function in discussions of books: they can encourage engagement, be helpful in bringing texts to life and advance children's thinking about literature.

    AB - It is generally accepted that talk enriches children's interpretations of texts in literature circle discussions. However, the nature of that talk and exactly how it facilitates interpretation of texts has not been much analysed. This article describes some work undertaken with a class of Scottish children, aged 9-10, to introduce them to the idea of literature circles. The literature circle discussions were then recorded and analysed. The purpose of the project was to record the kinds of exchanges, chains of comment and range of discourses and voices that children used when talking among themselves, and to reflect on their function and value. It was found that a lot of the talk was exploratory though not always in the sense proposed by Mercer. In his terms much was 'cumulative'. Some talk veered towards anecdotal chat. The children also frequently put on voices not their own, mimicking characters in the story they were reading, and other people they knew. These forms of talk are not always encouraged in the classroom, their effectiveness for learning being in doubt. This article argues that cumulative talk, the telling of anecdotes and the performing of different characters' voices all have a useful function in discussions of books: they can encourage engagement, be helpful in bringing texts to life and advance children's thinking about literature.

    KW - literature circles • anecdote • voices • acting

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957118093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1741-4369.2010.00543.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1741-4369.2010.00543.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 44

    SP - 3

    EP - 11

    JO - Literacy

    T2 - Literacy

    JF - Literacy

    SN - 1741-4350

    IS - 1

    ER -