Accounting for the fictitious

a Marxist contribution to understanding accounting's roles in the financial crisis

Christine Cooper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)
56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper presents a contribution to the debates surrounding the culpability of accounting in the recent financial crisis. It adopts a Marxist theoretical perspective concentrating mainly on Marx’s work on fictitious capital. Fictitious capital is any form of investment (for example bonds, stocks, derivatives, and collateralized debt obligations) which is based upon the expectation of future returns. According to Marx while fictitious capital is useful to capitalism, it cannot create value – only human labour can do that. The recent crisis was exacerbated by the significant amounts of investment which were made in extreme forms of fictitious capital. The paper argues that the accounting profession’s adoption of financial economic rationalities meant that it helped to animate the form of financialised neo-liberalism which dominated at the time of the crisis. The accounting profession and accounting academia have implemented and propagated technologies and rationalities which enabled, legitimised, and drove the activities of business in general and financial institutions in particular in the run up to and since the crisis. While, accounting could be seen as being complicit in the crisis, it is important to remember that it was a capitalist crisis. The intuitional structures of accounting mean that it is susceptible of being captured by the most powerful in society.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages20
JournalCritical Perspectives On Accounting
Early online date5 Oct 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

financial crisis
rationality
profession
neoliberalism
indebtedness
Financial crisis
capitalist society
obligation
labor
economics
Values
Accounting profession

Keywords

  • critical
  • social
  • public interest capitalism
  • Marx

Cite this

@article{7aabb41c15b04b46af71e576e6a1b31a,
title = "Accounting for the fictitious: a Marxist contribution to understanding accounting's roles in the financial crisis",
abstract = "This paper presents a contribution to the debates surrounding the culpability of accounting in the recent financial crisis. It adopts a Marxist theoretical perspective concentrating mainly on Marx’s work on fictitious capital. Fictitious capital is any form of investment (for example bonds, stocks, derivatives, and collateralized debt obligations) which is based upon the expectation of future returns. According to Marx while fictitious capital is useful to capitalism, it cannot create value – only human labour can do that. The recent crisis was exacerbated by the significant amounts of investment which were made in extreme forms of fictitious capital. The paper argues that the accounting profession’s adoption of financial economic rationalities meant that it helped to animate the form of financialised neo-liberalism which dominated at the time of the crisis. The accounting profession and accounting academia have implemented and propagated technologies and rationalities which enabled, legitimised, and drove the activities of business in general and financial institutions in particular in the run up to and since the crisis. While, accounting could be seen as being complicit in the crisis, it is important to remember that it was a capitalist crisis. The intuitional structures of accounting mean that it is susceptible of being captured by the most powerful in society.",
keywords = "critical, social, public interest capitalism, Marx",
author = "Christine Cooper",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.cpa.2014.08.002",
language = "English",
journal = "Critical Perspectives On Accounting",
issn = "1045-2354",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accounting for the fictitious

T2 - a Marxist contribution to understanding accounting's roles in the financial crisis

AU - Cooper, Christine

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper presents a contribution to the debates surrounding the culpability of accounting in the recent financial crisis. It adopts a Marxist theoretical perspective concentrating mainly on Marx’s work on fictitious capital. Fictitious capital is any form of investment (for example bonds, stocks, derivatives, and collateralized debt obligations) which is based upon the expectation of future returns. According to Marx while fictitious capital is useful to capitalism, it cannot create value – only human labour can do that. The recent crisis was exacerbated by the significant amounts of investment which were made in extreme forms of fictitious capital. The paper argues that the accounting profession’s adoption of financial economic rationalities meant that it helped to animate the form of financialised neo-liberalism which dominated at the time of the crisis. The accounting profession and accounting academia have implemented and propagated technologies and rationalities which enabled, legitimised, and drove the activities of business in general and financial institutions in particular in the run up to and since the crisis. While, accounting could be seen as being complicit in the crisis, it is important to remember that it was a capitalist crisis. The intuitional structures of accounting mean that it is susceptible of being captured by the most powerful in society.

AB - This paper presents a contribution to the debates surrounding the culpability of accounting in the recent financial crisis. It adopts a Marxist theoretical perspective concentrating mainly on Marx’s work on fictitious capital. Fictitious capital is any form of investment (for example bonds, stocks, derivatives, and collateralized debt obligations) which is based upon the expectation of future returns. According to Marx while fictitious capital is useful to capitalism, it cannot create value – only human labour can do that. The recent crisis was exacerbated by the significant amounts of investment which were made in extreme forms of fictitious capital. The paper argues that the accounting profession’s adoption of financial economic rationalities meant that it helped to animate the form of financialised neo-liberalism which dominated at the time of the crisis. The accounting profession and accounting academia have implemented and propagated technologies and rationalities which enabled, legitimised, and drove the activities of business in general and financial institutions in particular in the run up to and since the crisis. While, accounting could be seen as being complicit in the crisis, it is important to remember that it was a capitalist crisis. The intuitional structures of accounting mean that it is susceptible of being captured by the most powerful in society.

KW - critical

KW - social

KW - public interest capitalism

KW - Marx

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10452354

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235414000926

U2 - 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.08.002

M3 - Article

JO - Critical Perspectives On Accounting

JF - Critical Perspectives On Accounting

SN - 1045-2354

ER -