Access to justice in the employment tribunal: private disputes or public concerns?

Nicole Busby, Morag McDermont

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with access to justice for workers against the backdrop of cuts to legal aid, the imposition of employment tribunal (ET) fees and other recent amendments to the already complex, restrictive and highly technical labour law framework. The financial crisis and resulting austerity measures have been cited by the Coalition Government as justification for these changes but we argue that their effect has been far more extensive and damaging than would be proportionate even in response to the deepest structural recession. In the chapter we use case studies from a two-year multi-site research project, ‘Citizens Advice Bureaux and Employment Disputes’ to provide examples of the impact of the current system on the experiences of a group of claimants to the ET. As some of these personal stories demonstrate, the denial of access to justice for those seeking redress against often powerful and unscrupulous employers can have devastating and long-lasting effects on the lives of individuals and their families.

The chapter begins with a consideration of the operation of the labour market, the nature of employment relations and the development of workplace dispute resolution the last fifteen years or so. We argue that the current system does not provide a suitable and effective forum for resolving workplace disputes and that recent government reforms have exacerbated, rather than improved, things for workers who experience unlawful treatment at work such as discrimination, unfair dismissal or non-payment of wages. The net result is likely to be retrenchment of pre-existing inequalities of power between workers and employers which will be felt to such an extent that labour law is in severe danger of losing its democratic function. We conclude by suggesting some alternative approaches by which employment disputes could be resolved or avoided whilst ensuring access to justice.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationAccess to Justice
Subtitle of host publicationBeyond the Policies and Politics of Austerity
EditorsEllie Palmer, Tom Cornford, Yseult Marique, Audrey Guinchard
Place of PublicationOxford
Pages175-196
Number of pages21
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

justice
labor law
worker
employer
workplace
legal aid
government reform
dismissal
recession
fee
financial crisis
amendment
coalition
wage
experience
research project
discrimination
labor market
citizen
Group

Keywords

  • employment tribunal
  • private disputes
  • legal services

Cite this

Busby, N., & McDermont, M. (2016). Access to justice in the employment tribunal: private disputes or public concerns? In E. Palmer, T. Cornford, Y. Marique, & A. Guinchard (Eds.), Access to Justice: Beyond the Policies and Politics of Austerity (pp. 175-196). Oxford.
Busby, Nicole ; McDermont, Morag. / Access to justice in the employment tribunal : private disputes or public concerns?. Access to Justice: Beyond the Policies and Politics of Austerity. editor / Ellie Palmer ; Tom Cornford ; Yseult Marique ; Audrey Guinchard. Oxford, 2016. pp. 175-196
@inbook{5bbd0b1b5be44c2f80b1bacfa19a4821,
title = "Access to justice in the employment tribunal: private disputes or public concerns?",
abstract = "This chapter is concerned with access to justice for workers against the backdrop of cuts to legal aid, the imposition of employment tribunal (ET) fees and other recent amendments to the already complex, restrictive and highly technical labour law framework. The financial crisis and resulting austerity measures have been cited by the Coalition Government as justification for these changes but we argue that their effect has been far more extensive and damaging than would be proportionate even in response to the deepest structural recession. In the chapter we use case studies from a two-year multi-site research project, ‘Citizens Advice Bureaux and Employment Disputes’ to provide examples of the impact of the current system on the experiences of a group of claimants to the ET. As some of these personal stories demonstrate, the denial of access to justice for those seeking redress against often powerful and unscrupulous employers can have devastating and long-lasting effects on the lives of individuals and their families. The chapter begins with a consideration of the operation of the labour market, the nature of employment relations and the development of workplace dispute resolution the last fifteen years or so. We argue that the current system does not provide a suitable and effective forum for resolving workplace disputes and that recent government reforms have exacerbated, rather than improved, things for workers who experience unlawful treatment at work such as discrimination, unfair dismissal or non-payment of wages. The net result is likely to be retrenchment of pre-existing inequalities of power between workers and employers which will be felt to such an extent that labour law is in severe danger of losing its democratic function. We conclude by suggesting some alternative approaches by which employment disputes could be resolved or avoided whilst ensuring access to justice.",
keywords = "employment tribunal, private disputes, legal services",
author = "Nicole Busby and Morag McDermont",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781849467346",
pages = "175--196",
editor = "Ellie Palmer and Cornford, {Tom } and Yseult Marique and Audrey Guinchard",
booktitle = "Access to Justice",

}

Busby, N & McDermont, M 2016, Access to justice in the employment tribunal: private disputes or public concerns? in E Palmer, T Cornford, Y Marique & A Guinchard (eds), Access to Justice: Beyond the Policies and Politics of Austerity. Oxford, pp. 175-196.

Access to justice in the employment tribunal : private disputes or public concerns? / Busby, Nicole; McDermont, Morag.

Access to Justice: Beyond the Policies and Politics of Austerity. ed. / Ellie Palmer; Tom Cornford; Yseult Marique; Audrey Guinchard. Oxford, 2016. p. 175-196.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Access to justice in the employment tribunal

T2 - private disputes or public concerns?

AU - Busby, Nicole

AU - McDermont, Morag

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - This chapter is concerned with access to justice for workers against the backdrop of cuts to legal aid, the imposition of employment tribunal (ET) fees and other recent amendments to the already complex, restrictive and highly technical labour law framework. The financial crisis and resulting austerity measures have been cited by the Coalition Government as justification for these changes but we argue that their effect has been far more extensive and damaging than would be proportionate even in response to the deepest structural recession. In the chapter we use case studies from a two-year multi-site research project, ‘Citizens Advice Bureaux and Employment Disputes’ to provide examples of the impact of the current system on the experiences of a group of claimants to the ET. As some of these personal stories demonstrate, the denial of access to justice for those seeking redress against often powerful and unscrupulous employers can have devastating and long-lasting effects on the lives of individuals and their families. The chapter begins with a consideration of the operation of the labour market, the nature of employment relations and the development of workplace dispute resolution the last fifteen years or so. We argue that the current system does not provide a suitable and effective forum for resolving workplace disputes and that recent government reforms have exacerbated, rather than improved, things for workers who experience unlawful treatment at work such as discrimination, unfair dismissal or non-payment of wages. The net result is likely to be retrenchment of pre-existing inequalities of power between workers and employers which will be felt to such an extent that labour law is in severe danger of losing its democratic function. We conclude by suggesting some alternative approaches by which employment disputes could be resolved or avoided whilst ensuring access to justice.

AB - This chapter is concerned with access to justice for workers against the backdrop of cuts to legal aid, the imposition of employment tribunal (ET) fees and other recent amendments to the already complex, restrictive and highly technical labour law framework. The financial crisis and resulting austerity measures have been cited by the Coalition Government as justification for these changes but we argue that their effect has been far more extensive and damaging than would be proportionate even in response to the deepest structural recession. In the chapter we use case studies from a two-year multi-site research project, ‘Citizens Advice Bureaux and Employment Disputes’ to provide examples of the impact of the current system on the experiences of a group of claimants to the ET. As some of these personal stories demonstrate, the denial of access to justice for those seeking redress against often powerful and unscrupulous employers can have devastating and long-lasting effects on the lives of individuals and their families. The chapter begins with a consideration of the operation of the labour market, the nature of employment relations and the development of workplace dispute resolution the last fifteen years or so. We argue that the current system does not provide a suitable and effective forum for resolving workplace disputes and that recent government reforms have exacerbated, rather than improved, things for workers who experience unlawful treatment at work such as discrimination, unfair dismissal or non-payment of wages. The net result is likely to be retrenchment of pre-existing inequalities of power between workers and employers which will be felt to such an extent that labour law is in severe danger of losing its democratic function. We conclude by suggesting some alternative approaches by which employment disputes could be resolved or avoided whilst ensuring access to justice.

KW - employment tribunal

KW - private disputes

KW - legal services

UR - http://www.hartpub.co.uk/books/details.asp?isbn=9781849467346

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781849467346

SP - 175

EP - 196

BT - Access to Justice

A2 - Palmer, Ellie

A2 - Cornford, Tom

A2 - Marique, Yseult

A2 - Guinchard, Audrey

CY - Oxford

ER -

Busby N, McDermont M. Access to justice in the employment tribunal: private disputes or public concerns? In Palmer E, Cornford T, Marique Y, Guinchard A, editors, Access to Justice: Beyond the Policies and Politics of Austerity. Oxford. 2016. p. 175-196