Acceptability and response to a postal survey using self-taken samples for HPV vaccine impact monitoring

Katy Sink, Michelle Lacey, Christopher Robertson, Kimberley Kavanagh, Kate Cuschieri, Donna Nicholson, Martin Donaghy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims to assess the feasibility and acceptance of a postal survey to measure human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence and monitor vaccine impact, using self-taken specimens from young women who do not attend their first cervical screening appointment. Focus groups informed the survey design identifying factors that would influence acceptability. Postal testing kits were sent to a nationally representative sample of unscreened women. Overall response rate, the influence of different specimen types (urine or vaginal swab) and the receipt of a reminder letter on participation were calculated. Specimens were tested anonymously for HPV. Individual test results were not provided. Of 5500 kits sent, 725 were returned (13.2%). Fifty-two women actively opted out. There was a higher return rate for urine kits (13.7% vs 12%) and from those who received a reminder letter (15.5% vs 12.2%). Response was influenced by deprivation (10.3% in the most deprived quintile vs 16.2% in the least). Overall weighted HPV prevalence was 35.9% (40.0% from swab specimens and 31.9% from urine).
Some women were willing to participate in anonymised postal testing. However, the low uptake means that HPV prevalence results are difficult to interpret for ongoing surveillance. Monitoring HPV vaccine impact outwith the cervical screening programme remains challenging.

LanguageEnglish
Pages548-552
Number of pages5
JournalSexually Transmitted Infections
Volume87
Issue number7
Early online date11 Oct 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Papillomavirus Vaccines
Urine
Focus Groups
Appointments and Schedules
Vaccines
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • HPV vaccine
  • impact monitoring
  • mathematical analysis

Cite this

Sink, Katy ; Lacey, Michelle ; Robertson, Christopher ; Kavanagh, Kimberley ; Cuschieri, Kate ; Nicholson, Donna ; Donaghy, Martin. / Acceptability and response to a postal survey using self-taken samples for HPV vaccine impact monitoring. In: Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2011 ; Vol. 87, No. 7. pp. 548-552.
@article{f259afed3d9440bdba88632474d99d2b,
title = "Acceptability and response to a postal survey using self-taken samples for HPV vaccine impact monitoring",
abstract = "Aims to assess the feasibility and acceptance of a postal survey to measure human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence and monitor vaccine impact, using self-taken specimens from young women who do not attend their first cervical screening appointment. Focus groups informed the survey design identifying factors that would influence acceptability. Postal testing kits were sent to a nationally representative sample of unscreened women. Overall response rate, the influence of different specimen types (urine or vaginal swab) and the receipt of a reminder letter on participation were calculated. Specimens were tested anonymously for HPV. Individual test results were not provided. Of 5500 kits sent, 725 were returned (13.2{\%}). Fifty-two women actively opted out. There was a higher return rate for urine kits (13.7{\%} vs 12{\%}) and from those who received a reminder letter (15.5{\%} vs 12.2{\%}). Response was influenced by deprivation (10.3{\%} in the most deprived quintile vs 16.2{\%} in the least). Overall weighted HPV prevalence was 35.9{\%} (40.0{\%} from swab specimens and 31.9{\%} from urine). Some women were willing to participate in anonymised postal testing. However, the low uptake means that HPV prevalence results are difficult to interpret for ongoing surveillance. Monitoring HPV vaccine impact outwith the cervical screening programme remains challenging.",
keywords = "HPV vaccine , impact monitoring, mathematical analysis",
author = "Katy Sink and Michelle Lacey and Christopher Robertson and Kimberley Kavanagh and Kate Cuschieri and Donna Nicholson and Martin Donaghy",
note = "Changed visibility",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1136/sextrans-2011-050211",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "548--552",
journal = "Sexually Transmitted Infections",
issn = "1368-4973",
number = "7",

}

Acceptability and response to a postal survey using self-taken samples for HPV vaccine impact monitoring. / Sink, Katy; Lacey, Michelle; Robertson, Christopher; Kavanagh, Kimberley; Cuschieri, Kate; Nicholson, Donna; Donaghy, Martin.

In: Sexually Transmitted Infections, Vol. 87, No. 7, 2011, p. 548-552.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acceptability and response to a postal survey using self-taken samples for HPV vaccine impact monitoring

AU - Sink, Katy

AU - Lacey, Michelle

AU - Robertson, Christopher

AU - Kavanagh, Kimberley

AU - Cuschieri, Kate

AU - Nicholson, Donna

AU - Donaghy, Martin

N1 - Changed visibility

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Aims to assess the feasibility and acceptance of a postal survey to measure human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence and monitor vaccine impact, using self-taken specimens from young women who do not attend their first cervical screening appointment. Focus groups informed the survey design identifying factors that would influence acceptability. Postal testing kits were sent to a nationally representative sample of unscreened women. Overall response rate, the influence of different specimen types (urine or vaginal swab) and the receipt of a reminder letter on participation were calculated. Specimens were tested anonymously for HPV. Individual test results were not provided. Of 5500 kits sent, 725 were returned (13.2%). Fifty-two women actively opted out. There was a higher return rate for urine kits (13.7% vs 12%) and from those who received a reminder letter (15.5% vs 12.2%). Response was influenced by deprivation (10.3% in the most deprived quintile vs 16.2% in the least). Overall weighted HPV prevalence was 35.9% (40.0% from swab specimens and 31.9% from urine). Some women were willing to participate in anonymised postal testing. However, the low uptake means that HPV prevalence results are difficult to interpret for ongoing surveillance. Monitoring HPV vaccine impact outwith the cervical screening programme remains challenging.

AB - Aims to assess the feasibility and acceptance of a postal survey to measure human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence and monitor vaccine impact, using self-taken specimens from young women who do not attend their first cervical screening appointment. Focus groups informed the survey design identifying factors that would influence acceptability. Postal testing kits were sent to a nationally representative sample of unscreened women. Overall response rate, the influence of different specimen types (urine or vaginal swab) and the receipt of a reminder letter on participation were calculated. Specimens were tested anonymously for HPV. Individual test results were not provided. Of 5500 kits sent, 725 were returned (13.2%). Fifty-two women actively opted out. There was a higher return rate for urine kits (13.7% vs 12%) and from those who received a reminder letter (15.5% vs 12.2%). Response was influenced by deprivation (10.3% in the most deprived quintile vs 16.2% in the least). Overall weighted HPV prevalence was 35.9% (40.0% from swab specimens and 31.9% from urine). Some women were willing to participate in anonymised postal testing. However, the low uptake means that HPV prevalence results are difficult to interpret for ongoing surveillance. Monitoring HPV vaccine impact outwith the cervical screening programme remains challenging.

KW - HPV vaccine

KW - impact monitoring

KW - mathematical analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82555187887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050211

DO - 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050211

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 548

EP - 552

JO - Sexually Transmitted Infections

T2 - Sexually Transmitted Infections

JF - Sexually Transmitted Infections

SN - 1368-4973

IS - 7

ER -