Accentuating the negative?: a political efficacy question-wording- experiment

Harold D. Clarke, Allan Kornberg, Thomas J. Scotto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Survey research on political efficacy is longstanding. In a number of countries efficacy has been measured using batteries of negatively worded "agree-disagree" statements. In this paper, we investigate the measurement properties of the Canadian variant of this traditional battery and compare its performance with an alternative, positively worded, battery. The research is based on data gathered by a random half-sample experiment administered in the 2004 Political Support in Canada national panel survey. Analyses of these data provide no evidence that negatively framing the statements designed to tap political efficacy is problematic. Rather, it appears that students of political efficacy would have been worse off if they had spent the past several decades conducting analyses employing positively worded variants of the traditional statements. Perhaps most important, scholars have not been misled by acquiescence bias depressing efficacious responses to the traditional battery. These experimental results indicate that widespread political inefficacy in contemporary democracies is a fact, not an artifact.
LanguageEnglish
Pages107-117
Number of pages11
JournalMethadology
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jun 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Democracy
experiment
Research
Artifacts
Canada
political support
survey research
Students
artifact
democracy
trend
performance
evidence
Surveys and Questionnaires
student

Keywords

  • confirmatory factor analysis
  • national panel survey
  • political efficacy

Cite this

Clarke, Harold D. ; Kornberg, Allan ; Scotto, Thomas J. / Accentuating the negative? a political efficacy question-wording- experiment. In: Methadology. 2010 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 107-117.
@article{dc91db3c86184615823e36d14f90b3b4,
title = "Accentuating the negative?: a political efficacy question-wording- experiment",
abstract = "Survey research on political efficacy is longstanding. In a number of countries efficacy has been measured using batteries of negatively worded {"}agree-disagree{"} statements. In this paper, we investigate the measurement properties of the Canadian variant of this traditional battery and compare its performance with an alternative, positively worded, battery. The research is based on data gathered by a random half-sample experiment administered in the 2004 Political Support in Canada national panel survey. Analyses of these data provide no evidence that negatively framing the statements designed to tap political efficacy is problematic. Rather, it appears that students of political efficacy would have been worse off if they had spent the past several decades conducting analyses employing positively worded variants of the traditional statements. Perhaps most important, scholars have not been misled by acquiescence bias depressing efficacious responses to the traditional battery. These experimental results indicate that widespread political inefficacy in contemporary democracies is a fact, not an artifact.",
keywords = "confirmatory factor analysis, national panel survey, political efficacy",
author = "Clarke, {Harold D.} and Allan Kornberg and Scotto, {Thomas J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1027/1614-2241/a000012",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "107--117",
journal = "Methadology",
issn = "1614-1881",
number = "3",

}

Accentuating the negative? a political efficacy question-wording- experiment. / Clarke, Harold D.; Kornberg, Allan; Scotto, Thomas J.

In: Methadology, Vol. 6, No. 3, 29.06.2010, p. 107-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accentuating the negative?

T2 - Methadology

AU - Clarke, Harold D.

AU - Kornberg, Allan

AU - Scotto, Thomas J.

PY - 2010/6/29

Y1 - 2010/6/29

N2 - Survey research on political efficacy is longstanding. In a number of countries efficacy has been measured using batteries of negatively worded "agree-disagree" statements. In this paper, we investigate the measurement properties of the Canadian variant of this traditional battery and compare its performance with an alternative, positively worded, battery. The research is based on data gathered by a random half-sample experiment administered in the 2004 Political Support in Canada national panel survey. Analyses of these data provide no evidence that negatively framing the statements designed to tap political efficacy is problematic. Rather, it appears that students of political efficacy would have been worse off if they had spent the past several decades conducting analyses employing positively worded variants of the traditional statements. Perhaps most important, scholars have not been misled by acquiescence bias depressing efficacious responses to the traditional battery. These experimental results indicate that widespread political inefficacy in contemporary democracies is a fact, not an artifact.

AB - Survey research on political efficacy is longstanding. In a number of countries efficacy has been measured using batteries of negatively worded "agree-disagree" statements. In this paper, we investigate the measurement properties of the Canadian variant of this traditional battery and compare its performance with an alternative, positively worded, battery. The research is based on data gathered by a random half-sample experiment administered in the 2004 Political Support in Canada national panel survey. Analyses of these data provide no evidence that negatively framing the statements designed to tap political efficacy is problematic. Rather, it appears that students of political efficacy would have been worse off if they had spent the past several decades conducting analyses employing positively worded variants of the traditional statements. Perhaps most important, scholars have not been misled by acquiescence bias depressing efficacious responses to the traditional battery. These experimental results indicate that widespread political inefficacy in contemporary democracies is a fact, not an artifact.

KW - confirmatory factor analysis

KW - national panel survey

KW - political efficacy

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77954792763&partnerID=40&md5=f9c0a11ae4491266eb7393a13c16268a

U2 - 10.1027/1614-2241/a000012

DO - 10.1027/1614-2241/a000012

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 107

EP - 117

JO - Methadology

JF - Methadology

SN - 1614-1881

IS - 3

ER -