TY - JOUR
T1 - Abundance of six tetracycline resistance genes in wastewater lagoons at cattle feedlots with different antibiotic use strategies
AU - Peak, Nicholas
AU - Knapp, Charles W.
AU - Yang, Richard K.
AU - Hanfelt, Margery M.
AU - Smith, Marilyn S.
AU - Aga, Diana S.
AU - Graham, David W.
PY - 2007/1
Y1 - 2007/1
N2 - The abundance of six tetracycline resistance genes tet(O), tet(Q), tet(W), tet(M), tet(B) and tet(L), were quantified over time in
wastewater lagoons at concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO) to
assess how feedlot operation affects resistance genes in downstream
surface waters. Eight lagoons at five cattle feedlots in the Midwestern
United States were monitored for 6 months. Resistance and 16S-rRNA gene
abundances were quantified using real-time PCR, and physicochemical
lagoon conditions, tetracycline levels, and other factors (e.g. feedlot
size and weather conditions) were monitored over time. Lagoons were
sorted according to antibiotic use practice at each site, and
designated as 'no-use', 'mixed-use' or 'high-use' for comparison.
High-use lagoons had significantly higher detected resistance gene
levels (tet(R); 2.8 x 10(6) copies ml(-1)) relative to no-use lagoons
(5.1 x 10(3) copies ml(-1); P < 0.01) and mixed-use lagoons (7.3 x
10(5) copies ml(-1); P = 0.076). Bivariate correlation analysis on
pooled data (n = 54) confirmed that tet(R) level strongly correlated
with feedlot area (r = 0.67, P < 0.01) and 'total' bacterial 16S-rRNA
gene level in each lagoon (r = 0.51, P < 0.01), which are both
characteristic of large CAFOs. tet(M) was the most commonly detected
gene, both in absolute number and normalized to 16S-rRNA gene level,
although tet(O), tet(Q) and tet(W) levels were also high in the mixed
and high-use lagoons. Finally, resistance gene levels were highly
seasonal with abundances being 10-100 times greater in the autumn
versus the summer. Results show that antibiotic use strategy strongly
affects both the abundance and seasonal distribution of resistance
genes in associated lagoons, which has implications on water quality
and feedlot management practices.
AB - The abundance of six tetracycline resistance genes tet(O), tet(Q), tet(W), tet(M), tet(B) and tet(L), were quantified over time in
wastewater lagoons at concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO) to
assess how feedlot operation affects resistance genes in downstream
surface waters. Eight lagoons at five cattle feedlots in the Midwestern
United States were monitored for 6 months. Resistance and 16S-rRNA gene
abundances were quantified using real-time PCR, and physicochemical
lagoon conditions, tetracycline levels, and other factors (e.g. feedlot
size and weather conditions) were monitored over time. Lagoons were
sorted according to antibiotic use practice at each site, and
designated as 'no-use', 'mixed-use' or 'high-use' for comparison.
High-use lagoons had significantly higher detected resistance gene
levels (tet(R); 2.8 x 10(6) copies ml(-1)) relative to no-use lagoons
(5.1 x 10(3) copies ml(-1); P < 0.01) and mixed-use lagoons (7.3 x
10(5) copies ml(-1); P = 0.076). Bivariate correlation analysis on
pooled data (n = 54) confirmed that tet(R) level strongly correlated
with feedlot area (r = 0.67, P < 0.01) and 'total' bacterial 16S-rRNA
gene level in each lagoon (r = 0.51, P < 0.01), which are both
characteristic of large CAFOs. tet(M) was the most commonly detected
gene, both in absolute number and normalized to 16S-rRNA gene level,
although tet(O), tet(Q) and tet(W) levels were also high in the mixed
and high-use lagoons. Finally, resistance gene levels were highly
seasonal with abundances being 10-100 times greater in the autumn
versus the summer. Results show that antibiotic use strategy strongly
affects both the abundance and seasonal distribution of resistance
genes in associated lagoons, which has implications on water quality
and feedlot management practices.
KW - tetracycline resistance genes
KW - wastewater lagoons
KW - cattle feedlots
KW - antibiotic
KW - strategies
UR - http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118491006/issue
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01123.x
U2 - 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01123.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01123.x
M3 - Article
SN - 1462-2920
VL - 9
SP - 143
EP - 151
JO - Environmental Microbiology
JF - Environmental Microbiology
IS - 1
ER -