A theoretical approach to understanding reasons for adolescent self-harm

Susan Rasmussen, Rory O'Connor, Keith Hawton

Research output: Contribution to conferencePoster

Abstract

Self-harm is common among adolescents. Recent research has attempted to understand the prevalence and the reasoning behind self-harm. The present study aimed to investigate 1) whether the reasons given for self-harm differed according to how long ago the self-harming behaviour occurred, and 2) whether motives (Cry of pain vs. cry for help) given at baseline were able to predict repetition of self-harm over a 6 month period. 988 school pupils aged 15-16 years completed a self-report questionnaire (modified version of the Child and Adolescent Self-Harm in Europe study) at two time points 6 months apart. The motive “to get relief from a terrible state of mind” was the most endorsed reason for self-harm (boys and girls). The least commonly endorsed reasons were the cry for help or ‘manipulative’ reasons. To investigate whether there were any differences in the reasons assigned to the behaviour as a result of when self-harm last occurred (less than a month, between a month and a year, more than a year) multinomial regression analysis was conducted. This analysis highlighted that the adolescents who had most recently self-harmed (less than a month) were significantly more likely to endorse the reason “I wanted to punish myself” than the over a month ago but less than a year, and the adolescents who had last self-harmed more than a year ago. In addition, logistic regression was conducted to establish whether the reasons for self-harming endorsed at T1 were able to predict self-harm 6 months later (T2). This analysis revealed that pupils who endorsed “I wanted to find out whether someone really loved me” at T1 were significantly less likely to self-harm at T2, whilst pupils who endorsed “wanting to get relief from a terrible state of mind” at T1 were significantly more likely to self-harm at T2. The results are discussed in relation to their implications for educational mental health provision.

Conference

Conference13th European Symposium on Suicide and Suicidal Behaviour
CountryItaly
CityRome
Period1/09/104/09/10

Fingerprint

Pupil
Self Report
Mental Health
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Pain
Research

Keywords

  • self-harm
  • adolescents
  • multinomial regression analysis
  • behaviour

Cite this

Rasmussen, S., O'Connor, R., & Hawton, K. (2010). A theoretical approach to understanding reasons for adolescent self-harm. Poster session presented at 13th European Symposium on Suicide and Suicidal Behaviour, Rome, Italy.
Rasmussen, Susan ; O'Connor, Rory ; Hawton, Keith. / A theoretical approach to understanding reasons for adolescent self-harm. Poster session presented at 13th European Symposium on Suicide and Suicidal Behaviour, Rome, Italy.
@conference{e55ccaa6415148cf82b38c3ffe9bc138,
title = "A theoretical approach to understanding reasons for adolescent self-harm",
abstract = "Self-harm is common among adolescents. Recent research has attempted to understand the prevalence and the reasoning behind self-harm. The present study aimed to investigate 1) whether the reasons given for self-harm differed according to how long ago the self-harming behaviour occurred, and 2) whether motives (Cry of pain vs. cry for help) given at baseline were able to predict repetition of self-harm over a 6 month period. 988 school pupils aged 15-16 years completed a self-report questionnaire (modified version of the Child and Adolescent Self-Harm in Europe study) at two time points 6 months apart. The motive “to get relief from a terrible state of mind” was the most endorsed reason for self-harm (boys and girls). The least commonly endorsed reasons were the cry for help or ‘manipulative’ reasons. To investigate whether there were any differences in the reasons assigned to the behaviour as a result of when self-harm last occurred (less than a month, between a month and a year, more than a year) multinomial regression analysis was conducted. This analysis highlighted that the adolescents who had most recently self-harmed (less than a month) were significantly more likely to endorse the reason “I wanted to punish myself” than the over a month ago but less than a year, and the adolescents who had last self-harmed more than a year ago. In addition, logistic regression was conducted to establish whether the reasons for self-harming endorsed at T1 were able to predict self-harm 6 months later (T2). This analysis revealed that pupils who endorsed “I wanted to find out whether someone really loved me” at T1 were significantly less likely to self-harm at T2, whilst pupils who endorsed “wanting to get relief from a terrible state of mind” at T1 were significantly more likely to self-harm at T2. The results are discussed in relation to their implications for educational mental health provision.",
keywords = "self-harm, adolescents, multinomial regression analysis , behaviour",
author = "Susan Rasmussen and Rory O'Connor and Keith Hawton",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
language = "English",
note = "13th European Symposium on Suicide and Suicidal Behaviour ; Conference date: 01-09-2010 Through 04-09-2010",

}

Rasmussen, S, O'Connor, R & Hawton, K 2010, 'A theoretical approach to understanding reasons for adolescent self-harm' 13th European Symposium on Suicide and Suicidal Behaviour, Rome, Italy, 1/09/10 - 4/09/10, .

A theoretical approach to understanding reasons for adolescent self-harm. / Rasmussen, Susan; O'Connor, Rory; Hawton, Keith.

2010. Poster session presented at 13th European Symposium on Suicide and Suicidal Behaviour, Rome, Italy.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePoster

TY - CONF

T1 - A theoretical approach to understanding reasons for adolescent self-harm

AU - Rasmussen, Susan

AU - O'Connor, Rory

AU - Hawton, Keith

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Self-harm is common among adolescents. Recent research has attempted to understand the prevalence and the reasoning behind self-harm. The present study aimed to investigate 1) whether the reasons given for self-harm differed according to how long ago the self-harming behaviour occurred, and 2) whether motives (Cry of pain vs. cry for help) given at baseline were able to predict repetition of self-harm over a 6 month period. 988 school pupils aged 15-16 years completed a self-report questionnaire (modified version of the Child and Adolescent Self-Harm in Europe study) at two time points 6 months apart. The motive “to get relief from a terrible state of mind” was the most endorsed reason for self-harm (boys and girls). The least commonly endorsed reasons were the cry for help or ‘manipulative’ reasons. To investigate whether there were any differences in the reasons assigned to the behaviour as a result of when self-harm last occurred (less than a month, between a month and a year, more than a year) multinomial regression analysis was conducted. This analysis highlighted that the adolescents who had most recently self-harmed (less than a month) were significantly more likely to endorse the reason “I wanted to punish myself” than the over a month ago but less than a year, and the adolescents who had last self-harmed more than a year ago. In addition, logistic regression was conducted to establish whether the reasons for self-harming endorsed at T1 were able to predict self-harm 6 months later (T2). This analysis revealed that pupils who endorsed “I wanted to find out whether someone really loved me” at T1 were significantly less likely to self-harm at T2, whilst pupils who endorsed “wanting to get relief from a terrible state of mind” at T1 were significantly more likely to self-harm at T2. The results are discussed in relation to their implications for educational mental health provision.

AB - Self-harm is common among adolescents. Recent research has attempted to understand the prevalence and the reasoning behind self-harm. The present study aimed to investigate 1) whether the reasons given for self-harm differed according to how long ago the self-harming behaviour occurred, and 2) whether motives (Cry of pain vs. cry for help) given at baseline were able to predict repetition of self-harm over a 6 month period. 988 school pupils aged 15-16 years completed a self-report questionnaire (modified version of the Child and Adolescent Self-Harm in Europe study) at two time points 6 months apart. The motive “to get relief from a terrible state of mind” was the most endorsed reason for self-harm (boys and girls). The least commonly endorsed reasons were the cry for help or ‘manipulative’ reasons. To investigate whether there were any differences in the reasons assigned to the behaviour as a result of when self-harm last occurred (less than a month, between a month and a year, more than a year) multinomial regression analysis was conducted. This analysis highlighted that the adolescents who had most recently self-harmed (less than a month) were significantly more likely to endorse the reason “I wanted to punish myself” than the over a month ago but less than a year, and the adolescents who had last self-harmed more than a year ago. In addition, logistic regression was conducted to establish whether the reasons for self-harming endorsed at T1 were able to predict self-harm 6 months later (T2). This analysis revealed that pupils who endorsed “I wanted to find out whether someone really loved me” at T1 were significantly less likely to self-harm at T2, whilst pupils who endorsed “wanting to get relief from a terrible state of mind” at T1 were significantly more likely to self-harm at T2. The results are discussed in relation to their implications for educational mental health provision.

KW - self-harm

KW - adolescents

KW - multinomial regression analysis

KW - behaviour

UR - http://www.esssb13.org/

UR - http://www.esssb13.org/download/abstract-book.pdf

M3 - Poster

ER -

Rasmussen S, O'Connor R, Hawton K. A theoretical approach to understanding reasons for adolescent self-harm. 2010. Poster session presented at 13th European Symposium on Suicide and Suicidal Behaviour, Rome, Italy.