A systematic review of the supportive care needs of people living with and beyond cancer of the colon and/or rectum

Grigorios Kotronoulas, Constantina Papadopoulou, Kathryn Burns-Cunningham, Mhairi Simpson, Roma Maguire

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Gaining a clear understanding of the health needs and concerns of people with cancer of the colon and/or rectum can help identify ways to offer a comprehensive care package. Our aim was to systematically assess the relevant literature and synthesise current available evidence. Methods Asystematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA Statement guidelines. Five electronic databases were searched to identify studies employing qualitative and/or quantitative methods. Pre-specified selection criteria were applied to all retrieved records. Findings were integrated in a narrative synthesis. Results: Of 3709 references initially retrieved, 54 unique studies were retained. A total of 136 individual needs were identified and classified into eight domains. Just over half of the needs (70; 51%) concerned information/education or health system/patient-clinician communication issues. Emotional support and reassurance when trying to deal with fear of cancer recurrence featured as themost prominent need regardless of clinical stage or phase of treatment. Information about diet/nutrition and about long-term self-management of symptoms and complications at home; tackling issues relating to the quality and mode of delivery of health-related information; help with controlling fatigue; and on-going contact with a trustworthy health professional also featured assalient needs. Available research evidence is of moderate-to-good quality. Conclusions: Investing time to sensitively inquire about the supportive care needs of this patient population is key, whilst evaluating and re-shaping clinical interactions based on patients' priorities is equally essential. The diverse needs identified require a multi-professional and multi-agency approach to ensure unmet needs are addressed or measures offered.
LanguageEnglish
Pages60-70
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Journal of Oncology Nursing
Volume29
Early online date30 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Aug 2017

Fingerprint

Rectal Neoplasms
Colonic Neoplasms
Health
Self Care
Health Education
Patient Selection
Fear
Fatigue
Patient Care
Communication
Databases
Guidelines
Diet
Recurrence
Research
Population
Neoplasms
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • colon cancer
  • colorectal cancer
  • patient-centred care
  • patient-reported outcomes
  • rectum cancer
  • supportive care
  • supportive care needs
  • systematic review
  • unmet needs

Cite this

Kotronoulas, Grigorios ; Papadopoulou, Constantina ; Burns-Cunningham, Kathryn ; Simpson, Mhairi ; Maguire, Roma. / A systematic review of the supportive care needs of people living with and beyond cancer of the colon and/or rectum. In: European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2017 ; Vol. 29. pp. 60-70.
@article{a73b8a80fea24b8c9bb92707101f2336,
title = "A systematic review of the supportive care needs of people living with and beyond cancer of the colon and/or rectum",
abstract = "Purpose: Gaining a clear understanding of the health needs and concerns of people with cancer of the colon and/or rectum can help identify ways to offer a comprehensive care package. Our aim was to systematically assess the relevant literature and synthesise current available evidence. Methods Asystematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA Statement guidelines. Five electronic databases were searched to identify studies employing qualitative and/or quantitative methods. Pre-specified selection criteria were applied to all retrieved records. Findings were integrated in a narrative synthesis. Results: Of 3709 references initially retrieved, 54 unique studies were retained. A total of 136 individual needs were identified and classified into eight domains. Just over half of the needs (70; 51{\%}) concerned information/education or health system/patient-clinician communication issues. Emotional support and reassurance when trying to deal with fear of cancer recurrence featured as themost prominent need regardless of clinical stage or phase of treatment. Information about diet/nutrition and about long-term self-management of symptoms and complications at home; tackling issues relating to the quality and mode of delivery of health-related information; help with controlling fatigue; and on-going contact with a trustworthy health professional also featured assalient needs. Available research evidence is of moderate-to-good quality. Conclusions: Investing time to sensitively inquire about the supportive care needs of this patient population is key, whilst evaluating and re-shaping clinical interactions based on patients' priorities is equally essential. The diverse needs identified require a multi-professional and multi-agency approach to ensure unmet needs are addressed or measures offered.",
keywords = "colon cancer, colorectal cancer, patient-centred care, patient-reported outcomes, rectum cancer, supportive care, supportive care needs, systematic review, unmet needs",
author = "Grigorios Kotronoulas and Constantina Papadopoulou and Kathryn Burns-Cunningham and Mhairi Simpson and Roma Maguire",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejon.2017.05.004",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "60--70",
journal = "European Journal of Oncology Nursing",
issn = "1462-3889",

}

A systematic review of the supportive care needs of people living with and beyond cancer of the colon and/or rectum. / Kotronoulas, Grigorios; Papadopoulou, Constantina; Burns-Cunningham, Kathryn; Simpson, Mhairi; Maguire, Roma.

In: European Journal of Oncology Nursing, Vol. 29, 31.08.2017, p. 60-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review of the supportive care needs of people living with and beyond cancer of the colon and/or rectum

AU - Kotronoulas, Grigorios

AU - Papadopoulou, Constantina

AU - Burns-Cunningham, Kathryn

AU - Simpson, Mhairi

AU - Maguire, Roma

PY - 2017/8/31

Y1 - 2017/8/31

N2 - Purpose: Gaining a clear understanding of the health needs and concerns of people with cancer of the colon and/or rectum can help identify ways to offer a comprehensive care package. Our aim was to systematically assess the relevant literature and synthesise current available evidence. Methods Asystematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA Statement guidelines. Five electronic databases were searched to identify studies employing qualitative and/or quantitative methods. Pre-specified selection criteria were applied to all retrieved records. Findings were integrated in a narrative synthesis. Results: Of 3709 references initially retrieved, 54 unique studies were retained. A total of 136 individual needs were identified and classified into eight domains. Just over half of the needs (70; 51%) concerned information/education or health system/patient-clinician communication issues. Emotional support and reassurance when trying to deal with fear of cancer recurrence featured as themost prominent need regardless of clinical stage or phase of treatment. Information about diet/nutrition and about long-term self-management of symptoms and complications at home; tackling issues relating to the quality and mode of delivery of health-related information; help with controlling fatigue; and on-going contact with a trustworthy health professional also featured assalient needs. Available research evidence is of moderate-to-good quality. Conclusions: Investing time to sensitively inquire about the supportive care needs of this patient population is key, whilst evaluating and re-shaping clinical interactions based on patients' priorities is equally essential. The diverse needs identified require a multi-professional and multi-agency approach to ensure unmet needs are addressed or measures offered.

AB - Purpose: Gaining a clear understanding of the health needs and concerns of people with cancer of the colon and/or rectum can help identify ways to offer a comprehensive care package. Our aim was to systematically assess the relevant literature and synthesise current available evidence. Methods Asystematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA Statement guidelines. Five electronic databases were searched to identify studies employing qualitative and/or quantitative methods. Pre-specified selection criteria were applied to all retrieved records. Findings were integrated in a narrative synthesis. Results: Of 3709 references initially retrieved, 54 unique studies were retained. A total of 136 individual needs were identified and classified into eight domains. Just over half of the needs (70; 51%) concerned information/education or health system/patient-clinician communication issues. Emotional support and reassurance when trying to deal with fear of cancer recurrence featured as themost prominent need regardless of clinical stage or phase of treatment. Information about diet/nutrition and about long-term self-management of symptoms and complications at home; tackling issues relating to the quality and mode of delivery of health-related information; help with controlling fatigue; and on-going contact with a trustworthy health professional also featured assalient needs. Available research evidence is of moderate-to-good quality. Conclusions: Investing time to sensitively inquire about the supportive care needs of this patient population is key, whilst evaluating and re-shaping clinical interactions based on patients' priorities is equally essential. The diverse needs identified require a multi-professional and multi-agency approach to ensure unmet needs are addressed or measures offered.

KW - colon cancer

KW - colorectal cancer

KW - patient-centred care

KW - patient-reported outcomes

KW - rectum cancer

KW - supportive care

KW - supportive care needs

KW - systematic review

KW - unmet needs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020018264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.05.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.05.004

M3 - Review article

VL - 29

SP - 60

EP - 70

JO - European Journal of Oncology Nursing

T2 - European Journal of Oncology Nursing

JF - European Journal of Oncology Nursing

SN - 1462-3889

ER -