A systematic literature review comparing ankle-foot orthoses and functional electrical stimulation in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis

Emma Davidson, Roy Bowers

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Statistics reveal that approximately 2.5 million people have been diagnosed with MS worldwide. This research
aimed to review all available literature on the use of Ankle-Foot Orthoses (AFO) and Functional Electrical
Stimulation (FES) for the treatment of gait difficulties in MS.
An extensive systematic search was carried out using the electronic databases Embase, Medline, CSA Illumina,
DyNamed, The Cochrane Library, Science Direct, ISI Web of Knowledge and The Knowledge Network. Of the
full texts sourced only 14 experimental papers were considered appropriate for critical appraisal in this literature
review.
The most reported outcomes were walking speed and energy expenditure. Six of the nine FES trials reported a
statistically significant increase in walking speed while one reported a non-significant decrease. Of the four AFO
trials, three reported an increase in walking speed, although only one was statistically significant, and one trial
showed a decrease. Psychological Cost Index (PCI) was commonly utilised as an indication of energy expenditure.
Two of the four AFO trials reported a decrease in PCI compared to four of the nine FES, (three significant). Only
the direct comparison trial and two of the five AFO trials, reported on stance phase kinematics, with the others
focusing on swing phase related outcomes. The variation in outcome measures makes comparison between AFO
and FES challenging.
This literature review highlights several limitations in the current evidence base, particularly a lack of baseline
information regarding participants and interventions being investigated. Few studies adequately report the
biomechanical effects of FES and AFO. The majority of the reviewed studies are of a low level of evidence.
Considerably more research is required of an elevated standard to strengthen evidence to inform future clinical
practice.

Conference

ConferenceISPO 2013 World Congress
Abbreviated titleISPO2013
CountryIndia
CityHyderabad
Period4/02/137/02/13
OtherInclusion, Participation & Empowerment
Internet address

Fingerprint

Costs
Kinematics
Statistics
Energy Metabolism

Keywords

  • patients
  • multiple sclerosis
  • literature review
  • ankle-foot orthoses
  • functional electrical stimulation
  • treatment
  • function
  • gait
  • MS
  • AFO
  • splint
  • brace
  • FES
  • rehabilitation

Cite this

@conference{5b56d4365d514d1c89aafa019b6a3647,
title = "A systematic literature review comparing ankle-foot orthoses and functional electrical stimulation in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis",
abstract = "Statistics reveal that approximately 2.5 million people have been diagnosed with MS worldwide. This research aimed to review all available literature on the use of Ankle-Foot Orthoses (AFO) and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) for the treatment of gait difficulties in MS.An extensive systematic search was carried out using the electronic databases Embase, Medline, CSA Illumina, DyNamed, The Cochrane Library, Science Direct, ISI Web of Knowledge and The Knowledge Network. Of the full texts sourced only 14 experimental papers were considered appropriate for critical appraisal in this literature review.The most reported outcomes were walking speed and energy expenditure. Six of the nine FES trials reported a statistically significant increase in walking speed while one reported a non-significant decrease. Of the four AFO trials, three reported an increase in walking speed, although only one was statistically significant, and one trial showed a decrease. Psychological Cost Index (PCI) was commonly utilised as an indication of energy expenditure. Two of the four AFO trials reported a decrease in PCI compared to four of the nine FES, (three significant). Only the direct comparison trial and two of the five AFO trials, reported on stance phase kinematics, with the others focusing on swing phase related outcomes. The variation in outcome measures makes comparison between AFO and FES challenging.This literature review highlights several limitations in the current evidence base, particularly a lack of baseline information regarding participants and interventions being investigated. Few studies adequately report the biomechanical effects of FES and AFO. The majority of the reviewed studies are of a low level of evidence. Considerably more research is required of an elevated standard to strengthen evidence to inform future clinical practice.",
keywords = "patients, multiple sclerosis, literature review, ankle-foot orthoses, functional electrical stimulation, treatment , function, gait, MS, AFO, splint, brace, FES, rehabilitation",
author = "Emma Davidson and Roy Bowers",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "6",
language = "English",
note = "ISPO 2013 World Congress, ISPO2013 ; Conference date: 04-02-2013 Through 07-02-2013",
url = "http://www.ispo2013.org/",

}

A systematic literature review comparing ankle-foot orthoses and functional electrical stimulation in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis. / Davidson, Emma; Bowers, Roy.

2013. Paper presented at ISPO 2013 World Congress, Hyderabad, India.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - A systematic literature review comparing ankle-foot orthoses and functional electrical stimulation in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis

AU - Davidson, Emma

AU - Bowers, Roy

PY - 2013/2/6

Y1 - 2013/2/6

N2 - Statistics reveal that approximately 2.5 million people have been diagnosed with MS worldwide. This research aimed to review all available literature on the use of Ankle-Foot Orthoses (AFO) and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) for the treatment of gait difficulties in MS.An extensive systematic search was carried out using the electronic databases Embase, Medline, CSA Illumina, DyNamed, The Cochrane Library, Science Direct, ISI Web of Knowledge and The Knowledge Network. Of the full texts sourced only 14 experimental papers were considered appropriate for critical appraisal in this literature review.The most reported outcomes were walking speed and energy expenditure. Six of the nine FES trials reported a statistically significant increase in walking speed while one reported a non-significant decrease. Of the four AFO trials, three reported an increase in walking speed, although only one was statistically significant, and one trial showed a decrease. Psychological Cost Index (PCI) was commonly utilised as an indication of energy expenditure. Two of the four AFO trials reported a decrease in PCI compared to four of the nine FES, (three significant). Only the direct comparison trial and two of the five AFO trials, reported on stance phase kinematics, with the others focusing on swing phase related outcomes. The variation in outcome measures makes comparison between AFO and FES challenging.This literature review highlights several limitations in the current evidence base, particularly a lack of baseline information regarding participants and interventions being investigated. Few studies adequately report the biomechanical effects of FES and AFO. The majority of the reviewed studies are of a low level of evidence. Considerably more research is required of an elevated standard to strengthen evidence to inform future clinical practice.

AB - Statistics reveal that approximately 2.5 million people have been diagnosed with MS worldwide. This research aimed to review all available literature on the use of Ankle-Foot Orthoses (AFO) and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) for the treatment of gait difficulties in MS.An extensive systematic search was carried out using the electronic databases Embase, Medline, CSA Illumina, DyNamed, The Cochrane Library, Science Direct, ISI Web of Knowledge and The Knowledge Network. Of the full texts sourced only 14 experimental papers were considered appropriate for critical appraisal in this literature review.The most reported outcomes were walking speed and energy expenditure. Six of the nine FES trials reported a statistically significant increase in walking speed while one reported a non-significant decrease. Of the four AFO trials, three reported an increase in walking speed, although only one was statistically significant, and one trial showed a decrease. Psychological Cost Index (PCI) was commonly utilised as an indication of energy expenditure. Two of the four AFO trials reported a decrease in PCI compared to four of the nine FES, (three significant). Only the direct comparison trial and two of the five AFO trials, reported on stance phase kinematics, with the others focusing on swing phase related outcomes. The variation in outcome measures makes comparison between AFO and FES challenging.This literature review highlights several limitations in the current evidence base, particularly a lack of baseline information regarding participants and interventions being investigated. Few studies adequately report the biomechanical effects of FES and AFO. The majority of the reviewed studies are of a low level of evidence. Considerably more research is required of an elevated standard to strengthen evidence to inform future clinical practice.

KW - patients

KW - multiple sclerosis

KW - literature review

KW - ankle-foot orthoses

KW - functional electrical stimulation

KW - treatment

KW - function

KW - gait

KW - MS

KW - AFO

KW - splint

KW - brace

KW - FES

KW - rehabilitation

UR - http://www.ispo2013.org/

UR - http://www.ispo2013.org/images/free_paper_abstract.pdf

M3 - Paper

ER -