A survey of techniques for predicting earthquake ground motions for engineering purposes

John Douglas, Hideo Aochi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the past four or five decades many advances have been made in earthquake ground-motion prediction and a variety of procedures have been proposed. Some of these procedures are based on explicit physical models of the earthquake source, travel-path and recording site while others lack a strong physical basis and seek only to replicate observations. In addition, there are a number of hybrid methods that seek to combine benefits of different approaches. The various techniques proposed have their adherents and some of them are extensively used to estimate ground motions for engineering design purposes and in seismic hazard research. These methods all have their own advantages and limitations that are not often discussed by their proponents. The purposes of this article are to: summarise existing methods and the most important references, provide a family tree showing the connections between different methods and, most importantly, to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

LanguageEnglish
Pages187-220
Number of pages34
JournalSurveys in Geophysics
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

ground motion
Earthquakes
earthquakes
engineering
earthquake
hazards
travel
Hazards
recording
estimates
predictions
seismic hazard
method
prediction

Keywords

  • earthquake
  • earthquake scenario
  • ground-motion prediction
  • seismic hazard assessment
  • strong ground motion

Cite this

@article{af79d1dd13c5416ea0e0eb67ce758154,
title = "A survey of techniques for predicting earthquake ground motions for engineering purposes",
abstract = "Over the past four or five decades many advances have been made in earthquake ground-motion prediction and a variety of procedures have been proposed. Some of these procedures are based on explicit physical models of the earthquake source, travel-path and recording site while others lack a strong physical basis and seek only to replicate observations. In addition, there are a number of hybrid methods that seek to combine benefits of different approaches. The various techniques proposed have their adherents and some of them are extensively used to estimate ground motions for engineering design purposes and in seismic hazard research. These methods all have their own advantages and limitations that are not often discussed by their proponents. The purposes of this article are to: summarise existing methods and the most important references, provide a family tree showing the connections between different methods and, most importantly, to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method.",
keywords = "earthquake, earthquake scenario, ground-motion prediction, seismic hazard assessment, strong ground motion",
author = "John Douglas and Hideo Aochi",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s10712-008-9046-y",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "187--220",
journal = "Surveys in Geophysics",
issn = "0169-3298",
number = "3",

}

A survey of techniques for predicting earthquake ground motions for engineering purposes. / Douglas, John; Aochi, Hideo.

In: Surveys in Geophysics, Vol. 29, No. 3, 05.2008, p. 187-220.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A survey of techniques for predicting earthquake ground motions for engineering purposes

AU - Douglas, John

AU - Aochi, Hideo

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - Over the past four or five decades many advances have been made in earthquake ground-motion prediction and a variety of procedures have been proposed. Some of these procedures are based on explicit physical models of the earthquake source, travel-path and recording site while others lack a strong physical basis and seek only to replicate observations. In addition, there are a number of hybrid methods that seek to combine benefits of different approaches. The various techniques proposed have their adherents and some of them are extensively used to estimate ground motions for engineering design purposes and in seismic hazard research. These methods all have their own advantages and limitations that are not often discussed by their proponents. The purposes of this article are to: summarise existing methods and the most important references, provide a family tree showing the connections between different methods and, most importantly, to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

AB - Over the past four or five decades many advances have been made in earthquake ground-motion prediction and a variety of procedures have been proposed. Some of these procedures are based on explicit physical models of the earthquake source, travel-path and recording site while others lack a strong physical basis and seek only to replicate observations. In addition, there are a number of hybrid methods that seek to combine benefits of different approaches. The various techniques proposed have their adherents and some of them are extensively used to estimate ground motions for engineering design purposes and in seismic hazard research. These methods all have their own advantages and limitations that are not often discussed by their proponents. The purposes of this article are to: summarise existing methods and the most important references, provide a family tree showing the connections between different methods and, most importantly, to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

KW - earthquake

KW - earthquake scenario

KW - ground-motion prediction

KW - seismic hazard assessment

KW - strong ground motion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56549098818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10712-008-9046-y

DO - 10.1007/s10712-008-9046-y

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 187

EP - 220

JO - Surveys in Geophysics

T2 - Surveys in Geophysics

JF - Surveys in Geophysics

SN - 0169-3298

IS - 3

ER -