A Story of 2.0 Texts and of the Landing of the Paris Agreement

Research output: Working paper

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Paris Agreement provides much needed momentum to the international climate change regime by providing a legal and policy platform for climate change action for the years to come. The negotiations leading to such an outcome were not easy, and a successful outcome was reached only because Parties were ready to compromise in order to secure a final agreement. The French Presidency of COP21 has repeatedly called for landing zones to be found on the most difficult areas of the negotiations. This paper compares the final Paris Agreement with the last Draft Text that was released on Thursday 10th December. It suggests that three areas of contention in the negotiations (cooperative mechanisms, loss and damage and transparency), reveal that the common red line was always differentiation between developed and developing countries.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationGlasgow
PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
Number of pages15
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2015

Publication series

NameStrathclyde Centre for Environmental Law & Governance Working Paper
PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
No.3
Volume2015

Fingerprint

climate change
transparency
compromise
damages
developing country
regime

Keywords

  • Paris Agreement
  • climate change regime
  • international law
  • environmental law

Cite this

Sindico, F. (2015). A Story of 2.0 Texts and of the Landing of the Paris Agreement. (Strathclyde Centre for Environmental Law & Governance Working Paper; Vol. 2015, No. 3). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
Sindico, Francesco. / A Story of 2.0 Texts and of the Landing of the Paris Agreement. Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2015. (Strathclyde Centre for Environmental Law & Governance Working Paper; 3).
@techreport{f2dc1bef90444791bfc91556c0dbae39,
title = "A Story of 2.0 Texts and of the Landing of the Paris Agreement",
abstract = "The Paris Agreement provides much needed momentum to the international climate change regime by providing a legal and policy platform for climate change action for the years to come. The negotiations leading to such an outcome were not easy, and a successful outcome was reached only because Parties were ready to compromise in order to secure a final agreement. The French Presidency of COP21 has repeatedly called for landing zones to be found on the most difficult areas of the negotiations. This paper compares the final Paris Agreement with the last Draft Text that was released on Thursday 10th December. It suggests that three areas of contention in the negotiations (cooperative mechanisms, loss and damage and transparency), reveal that the common red line was always differentiation between developed and developing countries.",
keywords = "Paris Agreement, climate change regime, international law, environmental law",
author = "Francesco Sindico",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "30",
language = "English",
series = "Strathclyde Centre for Environmental Law & Governance Working Paper",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
number = "3",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "University of Strathclyde",

}

Sindico, F 2015 'A Story of 2.0 Texts and of the Landing of the Paris Agreement' Strathclyde Centre for Environmental Law & Governance Working Paper, no. 3, vol. 2015, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.

A Story of 2.0 Texts and of the Landing of the Paris Agreement. / Sindico, Francesco.

Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2015. (Strathclyde Centre for Environmental Law & Governance Working Paper; Vol. 2015, No. 3).

Research output: Working paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - A Story of 2.0 Texts and of the Landing of the Paris Agreement

AU - Sindico, Francesco

PY - 2015/11/30

Y1 - 2015/11/30

N2 - The Paris Agreement provides much needed momentum to the international climate change regime by providing a legal and policy platform for climate change action for the years to come. The negotiations leading to such an outcome were not easy, and a successful outcome was reached only because Parties were ready to compromise in order to secure a final agreement. The French Presidency of COP21 has repeatedly called for landing zones to be found on the most difficult areas of the negotiations. This paper compares the final Paris Agreement with the last Draft Text that was released on Thursday 10th December. It suggests that three areas of contention in the negotiations (cooperative mechanisms, loss and damage and transparency), reveal that the common red line was always differentiation between developed and developing countries.

AB - The Paris Agreement provides much needed momentum to the international climate change regime by providing a legal and policy platform for climate change action for the years to come. The negotiations leading to such an outcome were not easy, and a successful outcome was reached only because Parties were ready to compromise in order to secure a final agreement. The French Presidency of COP21 has repeatedly called for landing zones to be found on the most difficult areas of the negotiations. This paper compares the final Paris Agreement with the last Draft Text that was released on Thursday 10th December. It suggests that three areas of contention in the negotiations (cooperative mechanisms, loss and damage and transparency), reveal that the common red line was always differentiation between developed and developing countries.

KW - Paris Agreement

KW - climate change regime

KW - international law

KW - environmental law

UR - https://www.strath.ac.uk/research/strathclydecentreenvironmentallawgovernance/ourwork/latestoutcomesfromourwork/

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Strathclyde Centre for Environmental Law & Governance Working Paper

BT - A Story of 2.0 Texts and of the Landing of the Paris Agreement

PB - University of Strathclyde

CY - Glasgow

ER -

Sindico F. A Story of 2.0 Texts and of the Landing of the Paris Agreement. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde. 2015 Nov 30. (Strathclyde Centre for Environmental Law & Governance Working Paper; 3).