A sociological analysis of engineering education

Research output: Contribution to conferenceProceeding

Abstract

Autoethnography is a social science method that could be described as a combination of ethnography and autobiography, telling stories that connect the personal to the cultural. My personal story is that of a teenager without the prerequisite 'maths and science' profile required for an engineering degree, who left school with no plans for a career in engineering. However, a later series of events led me to into an engineering career through the 'back door', and an engineering degree as a mature student. As someone who worked in industry first and did the degree later, I found that the very quantitative, objective and theoretical world of engineering education, didn’t seem to fit with the qualitative, subjective and applied reality.

These were some of the reflections captured in my autoethnography, and exploring engineering education, through the lens of educational sociology, has led me to question the contrast between the skills required for engineering practice, and the skills required to complete an engineering degree. In order to explore why this situation exists I concluded my project with a Bourdieusian sociological analysis, conceptualising engineering academia and practice as Bourdieusian fields, and exploring the habitus, or world view of the members of those fields, and how this informs engineering education. In this paper I will briefly introduce the relevant social science terminology and literature, before using this framework to describe how these concepts may inform the way that the engineering curriculum is conceived. I argue that we need to look to the past, the present, and the future, and reconsider what we think engineering is, in order to design a curriculum that will meet the future needs of industry.

Conference

ConferenceNew approaches to Engineering Higher Education
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityLondon
Period22/05/1722/05/17

Fingerprint

Engineering education
engineering
education
Social sciences
Curricula
social science
career
Terminology
curriculum
industry
Lenses
Industry
technical language
Students
ethnography
sociology

Keywords

  • engineering education
  • autoethnography
  • Bourdieusian analysis

Cite this

Moffat, K. (2017). A sociological analysis of engineering education. 113-118. New approaches to Engineering Higher Education, London, United Kingdom.
Moffat, K. / A sociological analysis of engineering education. New approaches to Engineering Higher Education, London, United Kingdom.6 p.
@conference{ac6f9f877f5f4e1ab8f52f8a72632ec8,
title = "A sociological analysis of engineering education",
abstract = "Autoethnography is a social science method that could be described as a combination of ethnography and autobiography, telling stories that connect the personal to the cultural. My personal story is that of a teenager without the prerequisite 'maths and science' profile required for an engineering degree, who left school with no plans for a career in engineering. However, a later series of events led me to into an engineering career through the 'back door', and an engineering degree as a mature student. As someone who worked in industry first and did the degree later, I found that the very quantitative, objective and theoretical world of engineering education, didn’t seem to fit with the qualitative, subjective and applied reality. These were some of the reflections captured in my autoethnography, and exploring engineering education, through the lens of educational sociology, has led me to question the contrast between the skills required for engineering practice, and the skills required to complete an engineering degree. In order to explore why this situation exists I concluded my project with a Bourdieusian sociological analysis, conceptualising engineering academia and practice as Bourdieusian fields, and exploring the habitus, or world view of the members of those fields, and how this informs engineering education. In this paper I will briefly introduce the relevant social science terminology and literature, before using this framework to describe how these concepts may inform the way that the engineering curriculum is conceived. I argue that we need to look to the past, the present, and the future, and reconsider what we think engineering is, in order to design a curriculum that will meet the future needs of industry.",
keywords = "engineering education, autoethnography, Bourdieusian analysis",
author = "K. Moffat",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "17",
language = "English",
pages = "113--118",
note = "New approaches to Engineering Higher Education : IET/EPC Conference ; Conference date: 22-05-2017 Through 22-05-2017",

}

Moffat, K 2017, 'A sociological analysis of engineering education' New approaches to Engineering Higher Education, London, United Kingdom, 22/05/17 - 22/05/17, pp. 113-118.

A sociological analysis of engineering education. / Moffat, K.

2017. 113-118 New approaches to Engineering Higher Education, London, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceProceeding

TY - CONF

T1 - A sociological analysis of engineering education

AU - Moffat, K.

PY - 2017/5/17

Y1 - 2017/5/17

N2 - Autoethnography is a social science method that could be described as a combination of ethnography and autobiography, telling stories that connect the personal to the cultural. My personal story is that of a teenager without the prerequisite 'maths and science' profile required for an engineering degree, who left school with no plans for a career in engineering. However, a later series of events led me to into an engineering career through the 'back door', and an engineering degree as a mature student. As someone who worked in industry first and did the degree later, I found that the very quantitative, objective and theoretical world of engineering education, didn’t seem to fit with the qualitative, subjective and applied reality. These were some of the reflections captured in my autoethnography, and exploring engineering education, through the lens of educational sociology, has led me to question the contrast between the skills required for engineering practice, and the skills required to complete an engineering degree. In order to explore why this situation exists I concluded my project with a Bourdieusian sociological analysis, conceptualising engineering academia and practice as Bourdieusian fields, and exploring the habitus, or world view of the members of those fields, and how this informs engineering education. In this paper I will briefly introduce the relevant social science terminology and literature, before using this framework to describe how these concepts may inform the way that the engineering curriculum is conceived. I argue that we need to look to the past, the present, and the future, and reconsider what we think engineering is, in order to design a curriculum that will meet the future needs of industry.

AB - Autoethnography is a social science method that could be described as a combination of ethnography and autobiography, telling stories that connect the personal to the cultural. My personal story is that of a teenager without the prerequisite 'maths and science' profile required for an engineering degree, who left school with no plans for a career in engineering. However, a later series of events led me to into an engineering career through the 'back door', and an engineering degree as a mature student. As someone who worked in industry first and did the degree later, I found that the very quantitative, objective and theoretical world of engineering education, didn’t seem to fit with the qualitative, subjective and applied reality. These were some of the reflections captured in my autoethnography, and exploring engineering education, through the lens of educational sociology, has led me to question the contrast between the skills required for engineering practice, and the skills required to complete an engineering degree. In order to explore why this situation exists I concluded my project with a Bourdieusian sociological analysis, conceptualising engineering academia and practice as Bourdieusian fields, and exploring the habitus, or world view of the members of those fields, and how this informs engineering education. In this paper I will briefly introduce the relevant social science terminology and literature, before using this framework to describe how these concepts may inform the way that the engineering curriculum is conceived. I argue that we need to look to the past, the present, and the future, and reconsider what we think engineering is, in order to design a curriculum that will meet the future needs of industry.

KW - engineering education

KW - autoethnography

KW - Bourdieusian analysis

UR - http://epc.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/New-Approaches-Conference-Proceedings-book-final.pdf

M3 - Proceeding

SP - 113

EP - 118

ER -

Moffat K. A sociological analysis of engineering education. 2017. New approaches to Engineering Higher Education, London, United Kingdom.