A snapshot of information use patterns of academics in British universities

D. Gardiner, D. McMenemy, G. Chowdhury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper aims to study information behaviour of academics in the digital age. Compares information behaviour of British university academics in three disciplines ? computer and information sciences, business/management, and English literature. English academics make higher use of printed information resources, such as text and reference books, than academics of any other discipline included in this study; they generally tended to be the least frequent users of electronic resources such as full-text databases, indexing and abstracting databases, search engines, and internet sites. CIS academics generally tended to make greatest use of electronic-based information resources, and the least use of print-based information resources, and business/management academics fell somewhere in between these two disciplines. CIS academics were generally the most enthusiastic about the benefits of electronic resources, whereas English academics were the least enthusiastic about them. Nearly a quarter of English academics disagreed to some extent that electronic information was easier to use than printed resources, which might go some way to explain their lower use of electronic materials, and higher use of printed materials.
LanguageEnglish
Pages341-359
Number of pages18
JournalOnline Information Review
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Information use
Information science
university
Search engines
Computer science
Industry
electronics
Internet
resources
business management
English literature
indexing
information science
computer science
search engine

Keywords

  • academic staff
  • digital libraries
  • information retrieval
  • United Kingdom
  • universities

Cite this

@article{a6d49140afca4638b21cba2f3adf4b5b,
title = "A snapshot of information use patterns of academics in British universities",
abstract = "This paper aims to study information behaviour of academics in the digital age. Compares information behaviour of British university academics in three disciplines ? computer and information sciences, business/management, and English literature. English academics make higher use of printed information resources, such as text and reference books, than academics of any other discipline included in this study; they generally tended to be the least frequent users of electronic resources such as full-text databases, indexing and abstracting databases, search engines, and internet sites. CIS academics generally tended to make greatest use of electronic-based information resources, and the least use of print-based information resources, and business/management academics fell somewhere in between these two disciplines. CIS academics were generally the most enthusiastic about the benefits of electronic resources, whereas English academics were the least enthusiastic about them. Nearly a quarter of English academics disagreed to some extent that electronic information was easier to use than printed resources, which might go some way to explain their lower use of electronic materials, and higher use of printed materials.",
keywords = "academic staff, digital libraries, information retrieval, United Kingdom, universities",
author = "D. Gardiner and D. McMenemy and G. Chowdhury",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1108/14684520610686274",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "341--359",
journal = "Online Information Review",
issn = "1468-4527",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "4",

}

A snapshot of information use patterns of academics in British universities. / Gardiner, D.; McMenemy, D.; Chowdhury, G.

In: Online Information Review, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2006, p. 341-359.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A snapshot of information use patterns of academics in British universities

AU - Gardiner, D.

AU - McMenemy, D.

AU - Chowdhury, G.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This paper aims to study information behaviour of academics in the digital age. Compares information behaviour of British university academics in three disciplines ? computer and information sciences, business/management, and English literature. English academics make higher use of printed information resources, such as text and reference books, than academics of any other discipline included in this study; they generally tended to be the least frequent users of electronic resources such as full-text databases, indexing and abstracting databases, search engines, and internet sites. CIS academics generally tended to make greatest use of electronic-based information resources, and the least use of print-based information resources, and business/management academics fell somewhere in between these two disciplines. CIS academics were generally the most enthusiastic about the benefits of electronic resources, whereas English academics were the least enthusiastic about them. Nearly a quarter of English academics disagreed to some extent that electronic information was easier to use than printed resources, which might go some way to explain their lower use of electronic materials, and higher use of printed materials.

AB - This paper aims to study information behaviour of academics in the digital age. Compares information behaviour of British university academics in three disciplines ? computer and information sciences, business/management, and English literature. English academics make higher use of printed information resources, such as text and reference books, than academics of any other discipline included in this study; they generally tended to be the least frequent users of electronic resources such as full-text databases, indexing and abstracting databases, search engines, and internet sites. CIS academics generally tended to make greatest use of electronic-based information resources, and the least use of print-based information resources, and business/management academics fell somewhere in between these two disciplines. CIS academics were generally the most enthusiastic about the benefits of electronic resources, whereas English academics were the least enthusiastic about them. Nearly a quarter of English academics disagreed to some extent that electronic information was easier to use than printed resources, which might go some way to explain their lower use of electronic materials, and higher use of printed materials.

KW - academic staff

KW - digital libraries

KW - information retrieval

KW - United Kingdom

KW - universities

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684520610686274

U2 - 10.1108/14684520610686274

DO - 10.1108/14684520610686274

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 341

EP - 359

JO - Online Information Review

T2 - Online Information Review

JF - Online Information Review

SN - 1468-4527

IS - 4

ER -