A right to refuse to kill? Human rights and conscientious objection to ‘assisted dying’ in the UK

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Conscientious objection (CO) in healthcare, already much-discussed in academic literature, is to the fore again in light of proposals to legalise ‘assisted dying’ in the United Kingdom. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has rarely considered the issue, but what jurisprudence there is clearly indicates that there is no right to CO for health professionals under Article 9 as currently understood. A right to military CO is now established under Article 9, however, and this chapter proposes (i) that this right can be understood as a ‘right to refuse to kill’, and (ii) that the ECtHR should extend it to health professionals in a very restricted range of contexts. It is argued here that theorising CO to assisted dying as a ‘right to refuse to kill’ could provide human rights protection where none currently exists, and could also facilitate better understanding of issues like ‘indirect involvement’ and ‘effective referral’.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch Handbook on Human Rights Law and Health
EditorsElizabeth Wicks, Nataly Papadopoulou
Place of PublicationCheltenham
Chapter5
Pages107-135
Number of pages29
ISBN (Electronic)9781803928036
Publication statusPublished - 23 Sept 2025

Keywords

  • conscientious objection
  • Article 9 ECHR
  • healthcare
  • assisted dying
  • military service

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A right to refuse to kill? Human rights and conscientious objection to ‘assisted dying’ in the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this