A review of the evidence of third sector performance and its relevance for a universal comprehensive health system

Emma Miller, Elke Heins, David Price , Allyson Pollock, John Mohan , Jean Shaoul

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    UK policy promotes third sector organisations as providers of NHS funded health and social care. We examine the evidence for this policy through a systematic literature review. Our results highlight several problems of studies comparing non-profits with other provider forms, questioning their usefulness for drawing lessons outside the place of study. Most studies deem contextual factors and the regulatory framework in which providers operate as much more important than ownership form. We conclude that the literature does not support the policy of a larger role for the third sector in healthcare, let alone a switch to a market-based system.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)515-526
    Number of pages12
    JournalSocial Policy and Society
    Volume9
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    health
    performance
    evidence
    market
    literature

    Keywords

    • universal comprehensive health system
    • NHS
    • social care
    • healthcare

    Cite this

    Miller, Emma ; Heins, Elke ; Price , David ; Pollock, Allyson ; Mohan , John ; Shaoul , Jean . / A review of the evidence of third sector performance and its relevance for a universal comprehensive health system. In: Social Policy and Society. 2010 ; Vol. 9 , No. 4. pp. 515-526.
    @article{9cdd40d73fd446c9ae961ee5485bee6f,
    title = "A review of the evidence of third sector performance and its relevance for a universal comprehensive health system",
    abstract = "UK policy promotes third sector organisations as providers of NHS funded health and social care. We examine the evidence for this policy through a systematic literature review. Our results highlight several problems of studies comparing non-profits with other provider forms, questioning their usefulness for drawing lessons outside the place of study. Most studies deem contextual factors and the regulatory framework in which providers operate as much more important than ownership form. We conclude that the literature does not support the policy of a larger role for the third sector in healthcare, let alone a switch to a market-based system.",
    keywords = "universal comprehensive health system , NHS, social care, healthcare",
    author = "Emma Miller and Elke Heins and David Price and Allyson Pollock and John Mohan and Jean Shaoul",
    year = "2010",
    doi = "10.1017/S1474746410000230",
    language = "English",
    volume = "9",
    pages = "515--526",
    journal = "Social Policy and Society",
    issn = "1474-7464",
    number = "4",

    }

    A review of the evidence of third sector performance and its relevance for a universal comprehensive health system. / Miller, Emma; Heins, Elke ; Price , David ; Pollock, Allyson ; Mohan , John ; Shaoul , Jean .

    In: Social Policy and Society, Vol. 9 , No. 4, 2010, p. 515-526.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A review of the evidence of third sector performance and its relevance for a universal comprehensive health system

    AU - Miller, Emma

    AU - Heins, Elke

    AU - Price , David

    AU - Pollock, Allyson

    AU - Mohan , John

    AU - Shaoul , Jean

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - UK policy promotes third sector organisations as providers of NHS funded health and social care. We examine the evidence for this policy through a systematic literature review. Our results highlight several problems of studies comparing non-profits with other provider forms, questioning their usefulness for drawing lessons outside the place of study. Most studies deem contextual factors and the regulatory framework in which providers operate as much more important than ownership form. We conclude that the literature does not support the policy of a larger role for the third sector in healthcare, let alone a switch to a market-based system.

    AB - UK policy promotes third sector organisations as providers of NHS funded health and social care. We examine the evidence for this policy through a systematic literature review. Our results highlight several problems of studies comparing non-profits with other provider forms, questioning their usefulness for drawing lessons outside the place of study. Most studies deem contextual factors and the regulatory framework in which providers operate as much more important than ownership form. We conclude that the literature does not support the policy of a larger role for the third sector in healthcare, let alone a switch to a market-based system.

    KW - universal comprehensive health system

    KW - NHS

    KW - social care

    KW - healthcare

    U2 - 10.1017/S1474746410000230

    DO - 10.1017/S1474746410000230

    M3 - Article

    VL - 9

    SP - 515

    EP - 526

    JO - Social Policy and Society

    JF - Social Policy and Society

    SN - 1474-7464

    IS - 4

    ER -