A review of probabilistic methods for defining reserve requirements

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution book

2 Citations (Scopus)
271 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper we examine potential improvements in how load and generation forecast uncertainty is captured when setting reserve levels in power systems with significant renewable generation penetration and discuss the merit of proposed new methods in this area. One important difference between methods is whether reserves are defined based on the marginal distribution of forecast errors, as calculated from historic data, or whether the conditional distribution, specific to the time at which reserves are being scheduled, is used. This paper is a review of published current practice in markets which are at the leading edge of this problem, summarizing their experiences, and aligning it with academic modeling work. We conclude that the ultimate goal for all markets expected to manage high levels of renewable generation should be a reserve setting mechanism which utilizes the best understanding of meteorological uncertainties combined with traditional models of uncertainty arising from forced outages.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting
Place of PublicationPiscataway, NJ
PublisherIEEE
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9781509041688
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Nov 2016
EventIEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting 2016 - Boston, United States
Duration: 17 Jul 201621 Jul 2016

Conference

ConferenceIEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting 2016
CountryUnited States
CityBoston
Period17/07/1621/07/16

Fingerprint

Outages
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • generation forecast uncertainty
  • load forecast uncertainty
  • forecast errors
  • meteorological uncertainties
  • probabilistic methods

Cite this

Dowell, J., Hawker, G., Bell, K., & Gill, S. (2016). A review of probabilistic methods for defining reserve requirements. In 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741361
Dowell, Jethro ; Hawker, Graeme ; Bell, Keith ; Gill, Simon. / A review of probabilistic methods for defining reserve requirements. 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting. Piscataway, NJ : IEEE, 2016.
@inproceedings{c488c9c21c5d4cf79ef518fa2aa651af,
title = "A review of probabilistic methods for defining reserve requirements",
abstract = "In this paper we examine potential improvements in how load and generation forecast uncertainty is captured when setting reserve levels in power systems with significant renewable generation penetration and discuss the merit of proposed new methods in this area. One important difference between methods is whether reserves are defined based on the marginal distribution of forecast errors, as calculated from historic data, or whether the conditional distribution, specific to the time at which reserves are being scheduled, is used. This paper is a review of published current practice in markets which are at the leading edge of this problem, summarizing their experiences, and aligning it with academic modeling work. We conclude that the ultimate goal for all markets expected to manage high levels of renewable generation should be a reserve setting mechanism which utilizes the best understanding of meteorological uncertainties combined with traditional models of uncertainty arising from forced outages.",
keywords = "generation forecast uncertainty, load forecast uncertainty, forecast errors, meteorological uncertainties, probabilistic methods",
author = "Jethro Dowell and Graeme Hawker and Keith Bell and Simon Gill",
note = "{\circledC} 2016 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741361",
language = "English",
booktitle = "2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting",
publisher = "IEEE",

}

Dowell, J, Hawker, G, Bell, K & Gill, S 2016, A review of probabilistic methods for defining reserve requirements. in 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting 2016, Boston, United States, 17/07/16. https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741361

A review of probabilistic methods for defining reserve requirements. / Dowell, Jethro; Hawker, Graeme; Bell, Keith; Gill, Simon.

2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting. Piscataway, NJ : IEEE, 2016.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution book

TY - GEN

T1 - A review of probabilistic methods for defining reserve requirements

AU - Dowell, Jethro

AU - Hawker, Graeme

AU - Bell, Keith

AU - Gill, Simon

N1 - © 2016 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.

PY - 2016/11/14

Y1 - 2016/11/14

N2 - In this paper we examine potential improvements in how load and generation forecast uncertainty is captured when setting reserve levels in power systems with significant renewable generation penetration and discuss the merit of proposed new methods in this area. One important difference between methods is whether reserves are defined based on the marginal distribution of forecast errors, as calculated from historic data, or whether the conditional distribution, specific to the time at which reserves are being scheduled, is used. This paper is a review of published current practice in markets which are at the leading edge of this problem, summarizing their experiences, and aligning it with academic modeling work. We conclude that the ultimate goal for all markets expected to manage high levels of renewable generation should be a reserve setting mechanism which utilizes the best understanding of meteorological uncertainties combined with traditional models of uncertainty arising from forced outages.

AB - In this paper we examine potential improvements in how load and generation forecast uncertainty is captured when setting reserve levels in power systems with significant renewable generation penetration and discuss the merit of proposed new methods in this area. One important difference between methods is whether reserves are defined based on the marginal distribution of forecast errors, as calculated from historic data, or whether the conditional distribution, specific to the time at which reserves are being scheduled, is used. This paper is a review of published current practice in markets which are at the leading edge of this problem, summarizing their experiences, and aligning it with academic modeling work. We conclude that the ultimate goal for all markets expected to manage high levels of renewable generation should be a reserve setting mechanism which utilizes the best understanding of meteorological uncertainties combined with traditional models of uncertainty arising from forced outages.

KW - generation forecast uncertainty

KW - load forecast uncertainty

KW - forecast errors

KW - meteorological uncertainties

KW - probabilistic methods

UR - http://www.pes-gm.org/2016/

U2 - 10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741361

DO - 10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741361

M3 - Conference contribution book

BT - 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting

PB - IEEE

CY - Piscataway, NJ

ER -

Dowell J, Hawker G, Bell K, Gill S. A review of probabilistic methods for defining reserve requirements. In 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. 2016 https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741361