A recommendation on how the method of setting water prices in Scotland should be changed

customer financed capital as a notional loan to the utility

Jim Cuthbert, Margaret Cuthbert, Cliff Lockyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It is difficult to over-estimate the importance of setting prices appropriately for a major utility like water, given that inappropriate pricing can cause unnecessary damage to the comparative competitiveness of a country’s economy. In an earlier article in the Commentary, (Cuthbert and Cuthbert, 2007), we gave a critique of the current cost regulatory capital value (CCRCV) method of utility pricing: a method used, for example, in setting revenue limits, and so prices, in the water industry in Scotland and in England. While that article identified significant problems with the CCRCV approach, we did not make detailed recommendations about how these problems might be rectified. This paper makes a specific proposal about how CCRCV should be modified: our proposal is particularly well suited to the circumstances where, as in the case of Scottish Water, CCRCV pricing is being applied in a publicly owned utility. We argue that implementation of the proposed approach would have a number of advantages: in particular, it would lead to significantly lower water charges, while being fully sustainable well within current levels of public expenditure provision; it would reduce the likelihood of eventual privatisation of the water industry in Scotland; and there is the technical advantage of greatly reducing the cost to the Scottish Budget of the capital charge levied by the Treasury on the assets of the water industry in Scotland.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-45
Number of pages9
JournalFraser of Allander Economic Commentary
Volume32
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Costs
Scotland
Loans
Water price
Regulatory capital
Pricing
Water industry
Water
Charge
Assets
Damage
England
Competitiveness
Price setting
Privatization
Revenue
Public expenditure

Keywords

  • Fraser of Allander Institute
  • water prices
  • Scottish economy
  • utility pricing

Cite this

@article{bdd5ce998e5e463cb33a8af7b69c71f2,
title = "A recommendation on how the method of setting water prices in Scotland should be changed: customer financed capital as a notional loan to the utility",
abstract = "It is difficult to over-estimate the importance of setting prices appropriately for a major utility like water, given that inappropriate pricing can cause unnecessary damage to the comparative competitiveness of a country’s economy. In an earlier article in the Commentary, (Cuthbert and Cuthbert, 2007), we gave a critique of the current cost regulatory capital value (CCRCV) method of utility pricing: a method used, for example, in setting revenue limits, and so prices, in the water industry in Scotland and in England. While that article identified significant problems with the CCRCV approach, we did not make detailed recommendations about how these problems might be rectified. This paper makes a specific proposal about how CCRCV should be modified: our proposal is particularly well suited to the circumstances where, as in the case of Scottish Water, CCRCV pricing is being applied in a publicly owned utility. We argue that implementation of the proposed approach would have a number of advantages: in particular, it would lead to significantly lower water charges, while being fully sustainable well within current levels of public expenditure provision; it would reduce the likelihood of eventual privatisation of the water industry in Scotland; and there is the technical advantage of greatly reducing the cost to the Scottish Budget of the capital charge levied by the Treasury on the assets of the water industry in Scotland.",
keywords = "Fraser of Allander Institute, water prices, Scottish economy, utility pricing",
author = "Jim Cuthbert and Margaret Cuthbert and Cliff Lockyer",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "37--45",
journal = "Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary",
issn = "2046-5378",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
number = "3",

}

A recommendation on how the method of setting water prices in Scotland should be changed : customer financed capital as a notional loan to the utility. / Cuthbert, Jim; Cuthbert, Margaret; Lockyer, Cliff.

In: Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary, Vol. 32, No. 3, 02.2009, p. 37-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A recommendation on how the method of setting water prices in Scotland should be changed

T2 - customer financed capital as a notional loan to the utility

AU - Cuthbert, Jim

AU - Cuthbert, Margaret

AU - Lockyer, Cliff

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - It is difficult to over-estimate the importance of setting prices appropriately for a major utility like water, given that inappropriate pricing can cause unnecessary damage to the comparative competitiveness of a country’s economy. In an earlier article in the Commentary, (Cuthbert and Cuthbert, 2007), we gave a critique of the current cost regulatory capital value (CCRCV) method of utility pricing: a method used, for example, in setting revenue limits, and so prices, in the water industry in Scotland and in England. While that article identified significant problems with the CCRCV approach, we did not make detailed recommendations about how these problems might be rectified. This paper makes a specific proposal about how CCRCV should be modified: our proposal is particularly well suited to the circumstances where, as in the case of Scottish Water, CCRCV pricing is being applied in a publicly owned utility. We argue that implementation of the proposed approach would have a number of advantages: in particular, it would lead to significantly lower water charges, while being fully sustainable well within current levels of public expenditure provision; it would reduce the likelihood of eventual privatisation of the water industry in Scotland; and there is the technical advantage of greatly reducing the cost to the Scottish Budget of the capital charge levied by the Treasury on the assets of the water industry in Scotland.

AB - It is difficult to over-estimate the importance of setting prices appropriately for a major utility like water, given that inappropriate pricing can cause unnecessary damage to the comparative competitiveness of a country’s economy. In an earlier article in the Commentary, (Cuthbert and Cuthbert, 2007), we gave a critique of the current cost regulatory capital value (CCRCV) method of utility pricing: a method used, for example, in setting revenue limits, and so prices, in the water industry in Scotland and in England. While that article identified significant problems with the CCRCV approach, we did not make detailed recommendations about how these problems might be rectified. This paper makes a specific proposal about how CCRCV should be modified: our proposal is particularly well suited to the circumstances where, as in the case of Scottish Water, CCRCV pricing is being applied in a publicly owned utility. We argue that implementation of the proposed approach would have a number of advantages: in particular, it would lead to significantly lower water charges, while being fully sustainable well within current levels of public expenditure provision; it would reduce the likelihood of eventual privatisation of the water industry in Scotland; and there is the technical advantage of greatly reducing the cost to the Scottish Budget of the capital charge levied by the Treasury on the assets of the water industry in Scotland.

KW - Fraser of Allander Institute

KW - water prices

KW - Scottish economy

KW - utility pricing

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/fraser/

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/frasercommentary/

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 37

EP - 45

JO - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

JF - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

SN - 2046-5378

IS - 3

ER -