A novel systematic method to evaluate computer supported collaborative design technologies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Selection of suitable computer-supported collaborative design (CSCD) technologies is crucial to facilitate successful projects. This paper presents the first systematic method for engineering design teams to evaluate and select the most suitable CSCD technologies comparing technology functionality and project requirements established in peer-reviewed literature. The paper first presents 220 factors that influence successful CSCD. These factors were then systematically mapped and categorised to create CSCD requirement statements. The novel evaluation and selection method incorporates these requirement statements within a matrix and develops a discourse analysis text processing algorithm with data from collaborative projects to automate the population of how technologies impact the success of CSCD in engineering design teams. This method was validated using data collected across 3 years of a student global design project. The impact of this method is the potential to change the way engineering design teams consider the technology they use and how the selection of appropriate tools impacts the success of their CSCD projects. The development of the CSCD evaluation matrix is the first of its kind enabling a systematic and justifiable comparison and technology selection, with the aim of best supporting the engineering designers collaborative design activity.

LanguageEnglish
Number of pages29
JournalResearch in Engineering Design
Early online date17 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 17 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Text processing
Students

Keywords

  • computer-supported collaborative design (CSCD)
  • engineering design
  • computer-aided engineering and design
  • collaboration
  • educational tools

Cite this

@article{f5c90d2bcf9c41d898bed5851d8a7028,
title = "A novel systematic method to evaluate computer supported collaborative design technologies",
abstract = "Selection of suitable computer-supported collaborative design (CSCD) technologies is crucial to facilitate successful projects. This paper presents the first systematic method for engineering design teams to evaluate and select the most suitable CSCD technologies comparing technology functionality and project requirements established in peer-reviewed literature. The paper first presents 220 factors that influence successful CSCD. These factors were then systematically mapped and categorised to create CSCD requirement statements. The novel evaluation and selection method incorporates these requirement statements within a matrix and develops a discourse analysis text processing algorithm with data from collaborative projects to automate the population of how technologies impact the success of CSCD in engineering design teams. This method was validated using data collected across 3 years of a student global design project. The impact of this method is the potential to change the way engineering design teams consider the technology they use and how the selection of appropriate tools impacts the success of their CSCD projects. The development of the CSCD evaluation matrix is the first of its kind enabling a systematic and justifiable comparison and technology selection, with the aim of best supporting the engineering designers collaborative design activity.",
keywords = "computer-supported collaborative design (CSCD), engineering design, computer-aided engineering and design, collaboration, educational tools",
author = "R. Brisco and Whitfield, {R. I.} and H. Grierson",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1007/s00163-019-00323-7",
language = "English",
journal = "Research in Engineering Design",
issn = "0934-9839",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A novel systematic method to evaluate computer supported collaborative design technologies

AU - Brisco, R.

AU - Whitfield, R. I.

AU - Grierson, H.

PY - 2019/9/17

Y1 - 2019/9/17

N2 - Selection of suitable computer-supported collaborative design (CSCD) technologies is crucial to facilitate successful projects. This paper presents the first systematic method for engineering design teams to evaluate and select the most suitable CSCD technologies comparing technology functionality and project requirements established in peer-reviewed literature. The paper first presents 220 factors that influence successful CSCD. These factors were then systematically mapped and categorised to create CSCD requirement statements. The novel evaluation and selection method incorporates these requirement statements within a matrix and develops a discourse analysis text processing algorithm with data from collaborative projects to automate the population of how technologies impact the success of CSCD in engineering design teams. This method was validated using data collected across 3 years of a student global design project. The impact of this method is the potential to change the way engineering design teams consider the technology they use and how the selection of appropriate tools impacts the success of their CSCD projects. The development of the CSCD evaluation matrix is the first of its kind enabling a systematic and justifiable comparison and technology selection, with the aim of best supporting the engineering designers collaborative design activity.

AB - Selection of suitable computer-supported collaborative design (CSCD) technologies is crucial to facilitate successful projects. This paper presents the first systematic method for engineering design teams to evaluate and select the most suitable CSCD technologies comparing technology functionality and project requirements established in peer-reviewed literature. The paper first presents 220 factors that influence successful CSCD. These factors were then systematically mapped and categorised to create CSCD requirement statements. The novel evaluation and selection method incorporates these requirement statements within a matrix and develops a discourse analysis text processing algorithm with data from collaborative projects to automate the population of how technologies impact the success of CSCD in engineering design teams. This method was validated using data collected across 3 years of a student global design project. The impact of this method is the potential to change the way engineering design teams consider the technology they use and how the selection of appropriate tools impacts the success of their CSCD projects. The development of the CSCD evaluation matrix is the first of its kind enabling a systematic and justifiable comparison and technology selection, with the aim of best supporting the engineering designers collaborative design activity.

KW - computer-supported collaborative design (CSCD)

KW - engineering design

KW - computer-aided engineering and design

KW - collaboration

KW - educational tools

U2 - 10.1007/s00163-019-00323-7

DO - 10.1007/s00163-019-00323-7

M3 - Article

JO - Research in Engineering Design

T2 - Research in Engineering Design

JF - Research in Engineering Design

SN - 0934-9839

ER -