A novel systematic approach for analysing exploratory design ideation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Two kinds of design ideation process may be distinguished in terms of the problems addressed: (i) solution-focused, i.e. generating solutions to address a fixed problem specifying a desired output; and (ii) exploratory, i.e. considering different interpretations of an open-ended problem and generating associated solutions. Existing systematic analysis approaches focus on the former; the literature is lacking such an approach for the latter. In this paper, we provide a means to systematically analyse exploratory ideation for the first time through a new approach: Analysis of Exploratory Design Ideation (AEDI). AEDI involves: (1) open-ended ideation tasks; (2) coding of explored problems and solutions from sketches; and (3) evaluating ideation performance based on coding. We applied AEDI to 812 concept sketches from 19 open-ended tasks completed during a neuroimaging study of 30 professional product design engineers. Results demonstrate that the approach provides: (i) consistent tasks that stimulate problem exploration; (ii) a reliable means of coding explored problems and solutions; and (iii) an appropriate way to rank/compare designers' performance. AEDI enables the benefits of systematic analysis (e.g. greater comparability, replicability, and efficiency) to be realised inexploratory ideation research, and studies using open-ended problems more generally. Future improvements include increasing coding validity and reliability.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-23
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Engineering Design
Early online date16 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Neuroimaging
Product design
Engineers

Keywords

  • creative design
  • design novelty
  • exploratory design
  • novelty assessment
  • novelty metrics

Cite this

@article{a852fb3b87d34ba1bc6fa0f29ab60da2,
title = "A novel systematic approach for analysing exploratory design ideation",
abstract = "Two kinds of design ideation process may be distinguished in terms of the problems addressed: (i) solution-focused, i.e. generating solutions to address a fixed problem specifying a desired output; and (ii) exploratory, i.e. considering different interpretations of an open-ended problem and generating associated solutions. Existing systematic analysis approaches focus on the former; the literature is lacking such an approach for the latter. In this paper, we provide a means to systematically analyse exploratory ideation for the first time through a new approach: Analysis of Exploratory Design Ideation (AEDI). AEDI involves: (1) open-ended ideation tasks; (2) coding of explored problems and solutions from sketches; and (3) evaluating ideation performance based on coding. We applied AEDI to 812 concept sketches from 19 open-ended tasks completed during a neuroimaging study of 30 professional product design engineers. Results demonstrate that the approach provides: (i) consistent tasks that stimulate problem exploration; (ii) a reliable means of coding explored problems and solutions; and (iii) an appropriate way to rank/compare designers' performance. AEDI enables the benefits of systematic analysis (e.g. greater comparability, replicability, and efficiency) to be realised inexploratory ideation research, and studies using open-ended problems more generally. Future improvements include increasing coding validity and reliability.",
keywords = "creative design, design novelty, exploratory design, novelty assessment, novelty metrics",
author = "L. Hay and Duffy, {A. H. B.} and M. Grealy and M. Tahsiri and C. McTeague and T. Vuletic",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1080/09544828.2019.1662381",
language = "English",
pages = "1--23",
journal = "Journal of Engineering Design",
issn = "0954-4828",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A novel systematic approach for analysing exploratory design ideation

AU - Hay, L.

AU - Duffy, A. H. B.

AU - Grealy, M.

AU - Tahsiri, M.

AU - McTeague, C.

AU - Vuletic, T.

PY - 2019/9/16

Y1 - 2019/9/16

N2 - Two kinds of design ideation process may be distinguished in terms of the problems addressed: (i) solution-focused, i.e. generating solutions to address a fixed problem specifying a desired output; and (ii) exploratory, i.e. considering different interpretations of an open-ended problem and generating associated solutions. Existing systematic analysis approaches focus on the former; the literature is lacking such an approach for the latter. In this paper, we provide a means to systematically analyse exploratory ideation for the first time through a new approach: Analysis of Exploratory Design Ideation (AEDI). AEDI involves: (1) open-ended ideation tasks; (2) coding of explored problems and solutions from sketches; and (3) evaluating ideation performance based on coding. We applied AEDI to 812 concept sketches from 19 open-ended tasks completed during a neuroimaging study of 30 professional product design engineers. Results demonstrate that the approach provides: (i) consistent tasks that stimulate problem exploration; (ii) a reliable means of coding explored problems and solutions; and (iii) an appropriate way to rank/compare designers' performance. AEDI enables the benefits of systematic analysis (e.g. greater comparability, replicability, and efficiency) to be realised inexploratory ideation research, and studies using open-ended problems more generally. Future improvements include increasing coding validity and reliability.

AB - Two kinds of design ideation process may be distinguished in terms of the problems addressed: (i) solution-focused, i.e. generating solutions to address a fixed problem specifying a desired output; and (ii) exploratory, i.e. considering different interpretations of an open-ended problem and generating associated solutions. Existing systematic analysis approaches focus on the former; the literature is lacking such an approach for the latter. In this paper, we provide a means to systematically analyse exploratory ideation for the first time through a new approach: Analysis of Exploratory Design Ideation (AEDI). AEDI involves: (1) open-ended ideation tasks; (2) coding of explored problems and solutions from sketches; and (3) evaluating ideation performance based on coding. We applied AEDI to 812 concept sketches from 19 open-ended tasks completed during a neuroimaging study of 30 professional product design engineers. Results demonstrate that the approach provides: (i) consistent tasks that stimulate problem exploration; (ii) a reliable means of coding explored problems and solutions; and (iii) an appropriate way to rank/compare designers' performance. AEDI enables the benefits of systematic analysis (e.g. greater comparability, replicability, and efficiency) to be realised inexploratory ideation research, and studies using open-ended problems more generally. Future improvements include increasing coding validity and reliability.

KW - creative design

KW - design novelty

KW - exploratory design

KW - novelty assessment

KW - novelty metrics

UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cjen20/current

U2 - 10.1080/09544828.2019.1662381

DO - 10.1080/09544828.2019.1662381

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - Journal of Engineering Design

T2 - Journal of Engineering Design

JF - Journal of Engineering Design

SN - 0954-4828

ER -