Abstract
Background: Up to 50% of medicines are not used as intended, resulting in poor health and economic outcomes. Medicines optimisation is 'a person-centred approach to safe and effective medicines use, to ensure people obtain the best possible outcomes from their medicines'. The purpose of this exercise was to co-produce a prioritised research agenda for medicines optimisation using a multi-stakeholder (patient, researcher, public and health professionals) approach. Methods: A three-stage, multiple method process was used including: generation of preliminary research questions (Stage 1) using a modified Nominal Group Technique; electronic consultation and ranking with a wider multi-stakeholder group (Stage 2); a face-to-face, one-day consensus meeting involving representatives from all stakeholder groups (Stage 3). Results: In total, 92 research questions were identified during Stages 1 and 2 and ranked in order of priority during stage 3. Questions were categorised into four areas: 'Patient Concerns' [e.g. is there a shared decision (with patients) about using each medicine?], 'Polypharmacy' [e.g. how to design health services to cope with the challenge of multiple medicines use?], 'Non-Medical Prescribing' [e.g. how can the contribution of non-medical prescribers be optimised in primary care?], and 'Deprescribing' [e.g. what support is needed by prescribers to deprescribe?]. A significant number of the 92 questions were generated by Patient and Public Involvement representatives, which demonstrates the importance of including this stakeholder group when identifying research priorities. Conclusions: A wide range of research questions was generated reflecting concerns which affect patients, practitioners, the health service, as well the ethical and philosophical aspects of the prescribing and deprescribing of medicines. These questions should be used to set future research agendas and funding commissions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 64 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | BMC Health Services Research |
Volume | 21 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 13 Jan 2021 |
Funding
This work was funded by a GW4 initiator grant; reference number GW4-IF10–001. The funder had no involvement in the design, conduct or analysis of this exercise and had no involvement in the writing of this manuscript. NB was partially funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula. The NIHR had no involvement in the design, conduct or analysis of this exercise and had no involvement in the writing of this manuscript.
Keywords
- deprescribing
- medicines optimisation
- nominal group technique
- non-medical prescribing
- patient concerns
- polypharmacy reviews
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Data for "A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation"
Fellenor, J. (Creator), Britten, N. (Creator), Courtenay, M. (Creator), Payne, R. A. (Creator), Valderas, J. (Creator), Denholm, R. (Creator), Duncan, P. (Creator), McCahon, D. (Creator), Tatnell, L. (Creator), Fitzgerald, R. (Creator), Warmoth, K. (Creator), Gillespie, D. (Creator), Turner, K. (Creator) & Watson, M. (Creator), figshare, 30 May 2023
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5268263.v1
Dataset