A million years of waiting: competing accounts and comparative experiences of hospital waiting time policy

Alec Morton, Gwyn Bevan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

A million years of waiting: competing accounts and comparative experiences of hospital waiting-time policy Alec Morton and R. Gwyn Bevan 1. INTRODUCTION Waiting time for hospital care is one of the most easily measured dimensions of performance of a health care system, and one of the few dimensions that patients can assess unambiguously. Perhaps for that reason, it has been one of the most contentious and politically sensitive issues in health policy in many countries (although, arguably, patients should be more worried about variations in access and outcomes). The capacity for hospital waiting times to create acute political embarrassment can be seen in the headlines from various UK national newspapers during the period 2001–02 when popular concern about waiting times was running high (see Box 6.1). As a result of the high degree of exposure of this issue, waiting times have become an issue on which everyone has an opinion. At the roughest, rawest level, it is possible to distinguish two stances in lay and policy discussions about waiting times: ● ● policy action to improve waiting times is impossible, impractical, expensive and ineffectual, and has adverse effects on other hard-to-measure dimensions of quality of care; policy action to improve waiting times is possible, practical, desirable, and may even save money. We call the former stance the ‘miserabilist stance’ and the latter stance the ‘meliorist stance’. Yet understanding the consequences of policy action requires getting beyond these stances, and understanding how and why health care systems generate waits.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe LSE Companion to Health Policy
EditorsAlistair McGuire, Joan Costa-Font
Place of PublicationCheltenham
Number of pages19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Aug 2012

Fingerprint

Waiting time
Health care system
Health policy
Hospital care
Quality of care

Keywords

  • health policy and economics
  • economics and finance
  • public sector economics
  • politics and public policy
  • public policy
  • social policy and sociology

Cite this

Morton, A., & Bevan, G. (2012). A million years of waiting: competing accounts and comparative experiences of hospital waiting time policy. In A. McGuire, & J. Costa-Font (Eds.), The LSE Companion to Health Policy Cheltenham. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781004241.00014
Morton, Alec ; Bevan, Gwyn. / A million years of waiting : competing accounts and comparative experiences of hospital waiting time policy. The LSE Companion to Health Policy. editor / Alistair McGuire ; Joan Costa-Font. Cheltenham, 2012.
@inbook{4b44e434f22542bf94cb6df5d57d6b56,
title = "A million years of waiting: competing accounts and comparative experiences of hospital waiting time policy",
abstract = "A million years of waiting: competing accounts and comparative experiences of hospital waiting-time policy Alec Morton and R. Gwyn Bevan 1. INTRODUCTION Waiting time for hospital care is one of the most easily measured dimensions of performance of a health care system, and one of the few dimensions that patients can assess unambiguously. Perhaps for that reason, it has been one of the most contentious and politically sensitive issues in health policy in many countries (although, arguably, patients should be more worried about variations in access and outcomes). The capacity for hospital waiting times to create acute political embarrassment can be seen in the headlines from various UK national newspapers during the period 2001–02 when popular concern about waiting times was running high (see Box 6.1). As a result of the high degree of exposure of this issue, waiting times have become an issue on which everyone has an opinion. At the roughest, rawest level, it is possible to distinguish two stances in lay and policy discussions about waiting times: ● ● policy action to improve waiting times is impossible, impractical, expensive and ineffectual, and has adverse effects on other hard-to-measure dimensions of quality of care; policy action to improve waiting times is possible, practical, desirable, and may even save money. We call the former stance the ‘miserabilist stance’ and the latter stance the ‘meliorist stance’. Yet understanding the consequences of policy action requires getting beyond these stances, and understanding how and why health care systems generate waits.",
keywords = "health policy and economics, economics and finance, public sector economics, politics and public policy, public policy, social policy and sociology",
author = "Alec Morton and Gwyn Bevan",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "31",
doi = "10.4337/9781781004241.00014",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781781004234",
editor = "McGuire, {Alistair } and Costa-Font, {Joan }",
booktitle = "The LSE Companion to Health Policy",

}

A million years of waiting : competing accounts and comparative experiences of hospital waiting time policy. / Morton, Alec; Bevan, Gwyn.

The LSE Companion to Health Policy. ed. / Alistair McGuire; Joan Costa-Font. Cheltenham, 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - A million years of waiting

T2 - competing accounts and comparative experiences of hospital waiting time policy

AU - Morton, Alec

AU - Bevan, Gwyn

PY - 2012/8/31

Y1 - 2012/8/31

N2 - A million years of waiting: competing accounts and comparative experiences of hospital waiting-time policy Alec Morton and R. Gwyn Bevan 1. INTRODUCTION Waiting time for hospital care is one of the most easily measured dimensions of performance of a health care system, and one of the few dimensions that patients can assess unambiguously. Perhaps for that reason, it has been one of the most contentious and politically sensitive issues in health policy in many countries (although, arguably, patients should be more worried about variations in access and outcomes). The capacity for hospital waiting times to create acute political embarrassment can be seen in the headlines from various UK national newspapers during the period 2001–02 when popular concern about waiting times was running high (see Box 6.1). As a result of the high degree of exposure of this issue, waiting times have become an issue on which everyone has an opinion. At the roughest, rawest level, it is possible to distinguish two stances in lay and policy discussions about waiting times: ● ● policy action to improve waiting times is impossible, impractical, expensive and ineffectual, and has adverse effects on other hard-to-measure dimensions of quality of care; policy action to improve waiting times is possible, practical, desirable, and may even save money. We call the former stance the ‘miserabilist stance’ and the latter stance the ‘meliorist stance’. Yet understanding the consequences of policy action requires getting beyond these stances, and understanding how and why health care systems generate waits.

AB - A million years of waiting: competing accounts and comparative experiences of hospital waiting-time policy Alec Morton and R. Gwyn Bevan 1. INTRODUCTION Waiting time for hospital care is one of the most easily measured dimensions of performance of a health care system, and one of the few dimensions that patients can assess unambiguously. Perhaps for that reason, it has been one of the most contentious and politically sensitive issues in health policy in many countries (although, arguably, patients should be more worried about variations in access and outcomes). The capacity for hospital waiting times to create acute political embarrassment can be seen in the headlines from various UK national newspapers during the period 2001–02 when popular concern about waiting times was running high (see Box 6.1). As a result of the high degree of exposure of this issue, waiting times have become an issue on which everyone has an opinion. At the roughest, rawest level, it is possible to distinguish two stances in lay and policy discussions about waiting times: ● ● policy action to improve waiting times is impossible, impractical, expensive and ineffectual, and has adverse effects on other hard-to-measure dimensions of quality of care; policy action to improve waiting times is possible, practical, desirable, and may even save money. We call the former stance the ‘miserabilist stance’ and the latter stance the ‘meliorist stance’. Yet understanding the consequences of policy action requires getting beyond these stances, and understanding how and why health care systems generate waits.

KW - health policy and economics

KW - economics and finance

KW - public sector economics

KW - politics and public policy

KW - public policy

KW - social policy and sociology

UR - http://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781781004234.00014.xml

U2 - 10.4337/9781781004241.00014

DO - 10.4337/9781781004241.00014

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781781004234

BT - The LSE Companion to Health Policy

A2 - McGuire, Alistair

A2 - Costa-Font, Joan

CY - Cheltenham

ER -