A meta-analysis of trials of transurethral needle ablation for treating symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia

P. Boyle, C. Robertson, E. Darracott Vaughan, John M. Fitzpatrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This section opens with two meta-analyses, the first into the use of transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) for treating symptomatic BPH and the second into comparative trials between transurethral electrovaporization and TURP. The first of these meta-analyses showed that despite a variety of trial methods, not all were satisfactory. TUNA was effective in improving symptoms and flow rates. The place of this therapy in the treatment of symptomatic BPH is suggested. In the second meta-analysis, methodological shortcomings of the various trials are again discussed. The possible advantages of both of these treatments are described, but the authors suggest that there is a need for future well-designed trials with extended follow-up. This seems to be the ultimate conclusion of a significant number of the meta-analysis into technological treatments for symptomatic BPH.
LanguageEnglish
Pages83-88
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Urology International
Volume94
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2004

Fingerprint

Prostatic Hyperplasia
Needles
Meta-Analysis
Transurethral Resection of Prostate
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • BPH
  • TUNA
  • meta-analysis
  • efficacy
  • flow rate
  • IPSS

Cite this

@article{fd2d6905df384a72948f7e4452b86d29,
title = "A meta-analysis of trials of transurethral needle ablation for treating symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia",
abstract = "This section opens with two meta-analyses, the first into the use of transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) for treating symptomatic BPH and the second into comparative trials between transurethral electrovaporization and TURP. The first of these meta-analyses showed that despite a variety of trial methods, not all were satisfactory. TUNA was effective in improving symptoms and flow rates. The place of this therapy in the treatment of symptomatic BPH is suggested. In the second meta-analysis, methodological shortcomings of the various trials are again discussed. The possible advantages of both of these treatments are described, but the authors suggest that there is a need for future well-designed trials with extended follow-up. This seems to be the ultimate conclusion of a significant number of the meta-analysis into technological treatments for symptomatic BPH.",
keywords = "BPH, TUNA, meta-analysis, efficacy, flow rate, IPSS",
author = "P. Boyle and C. Robertson and Vaughan, {E. Darracott} and Fitzpatrick, {John M.}",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04906.x",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
pages = "83--88",
journal = "BJU International",
issn = "1464-4096",
number = "1",

}

A meta-analysis of trials of transurethral needle ablation for treating symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. / Boyle, P.; Robertson, C.; Vaughan, E. Darracott; Fitzpatrick, John M.

In: British Journal of Urology International, Vol. 94, No. 1, 07.2004, p. 83-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta-analysis of trials of transurethral needle ablation for treating symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia

AU - Boyle, P.

AU - Robertson, C.

AU - Vaughan, E. Darracott

AU - Fitzpatrick, John M.

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - This section opens with two meta-analyses, the first into the use of transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) for treating symptomatic BPH and the second into comparative trials between transurethral electrovaporization and TURP. The first of these meta-analyses showed that despite a variety of trial methods, not all were satisfactory. TUNA was effective in improving symptoms and flow rates. The place of this therapy in the treatment of symptomatic BPH is suggested. In the second meta-analysis, methodological shortcomings of the various trials are again discussed. The possible advantages of both of these treatments are described, but the authors suggest that there is a need for future well-designed trials with extended follow-up. This seems to be the ultimate conclusion of a significant number of the meta-analysis into technological treatments for symptomatic BPH.

AB - This section opens with two meta-analyses, the first into the use of transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) for treating symptomatic BPH and the second into comparative trials between transurethral electrovaporization and TURP. The first of these meta-analyses showed that despite a variety of trial methods, not all were satisfactory. TUNA was effective in improving symptoms and flow rates. The place of this therapy in the treatment of symptomatic BPH is suggested. In the second meta-analysis, methodological shortcomings of the various trials are again discussed. The possible advantages of both of these treatments are described, but the authors suggest that there is a need for future well-designed trials with extended follow-up. This seems to be the ultimate conclusion of a significant number of the meta-analysis into technological treatments for symptomatic BPH.

KW - BPH

KW - TUNA

KW - meta-analysis

KW - efficacy

KW - flow rate

KW - IPSS

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04906.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04906.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04906.x

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 83

EP - 88

JO - BJU International

T2 - BJU International

JF - BJU International

SN - 1464-4096

IS - 1

ER -