A little knowledge is a dangerous thing: some comments on the indeterminacy of Graham Sewell

P. Thompson, S. Ackroyd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Critiques of the over-optimistic claims of theories of the knowledge economy and management are increasing (Thompson et al., 2001; Brown and Hesketh, 2004; McKinlay, 2005) and it is always good to add another to the fold. Graham Sewell's article in this issue makes a welcome interrogation of the rhetoric of empowerment and commitment associated with knowledge work and points to the persistence of control relations within the management of expert labour. The article rightly focuses on managerial attempts to codify and convert tacit knowledge as central to this process. On the other hand, as a contribution to the consideration of control in contemporary work, Sewell's analysis is not very adequate from both an empirical and a conceptual point of view.
LanguageEnglish
Pages705-710
Number of pages5
JournalOrganization
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Personnel
Persistence
Labor
Knowledge management
Knowledge work
Empowerment
Knowledge economy
Indeterminacy
Tacit knowledge
Rhetoric
Power (Psychology)

Keywords

  • human resource management
  • knowledge economy
  • employment
  • work

Cite this

Thompson, P. ; Ackroyd, S. / A little knowledge is a dangerous thing: some comments on the indeterminacy of Graham Sewell. In: Organization. 2006 ; Vol. 12, No. 5. pp. 705-710.
@article{5f2b3dfa01784d978ef78a10c80db711,
title = "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing: some comments on the indeterminacy of Graham Sewell",
abstract = "Critiques of the over-optimistic claims of theories of the knowledge economy and management are increasing (Thompson et al., 2001; Brown and Hesketh, 2004; McKinlay, 2005) and it is always good to add another to the fold. Graham Sewell's article in this issue makes a welcome interrogation of the rhetoric of empowerment and commitment associated with knowledge work and points to the persistence of control relations within the management of expert labour. The article rightly focuses on managerial attempts to codify and convert tacit knowledge as central to this process. On the other hand, as a contribution to the consideration of control in contemporary work, Sewell's analysis is not very adequate from both an empirical and a conceptual point of view.",
keywords = "human resource management, knowledge economy, employment, work",
author = "P. Thompson and S. Ackroyd",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1177/1350508405055944",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "705--710",
journal = "Organization",
issn = "1350-5084",
number = "5",

}

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing: some comments on the indeterminacy of Graham Sewell. / Thompson, P.; Ackroyd, S.

In: Organization, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2006, p. 705-710.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A little knowledge is a dangerous thing: some comments on the indeterminacy of Graham Sewell

AU - Thompson, P.

AU - Ackroyd, S.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Critiques of the over-optimistic claims of theories of the knowledge economy and management are increasing (Thompson et al., 2001; Brown and Hesketh, 2004; McKinlay, 2005) and it is always good to add another to the fold. Graham Sewell's article in this issue makes a welcome interrogation of the rhetoric of empowerment and commitment associated with knowledge work and points to the persistence of control relations within the management of expert labour. The article rightly focuses on managerial attempts to codify and convert tacit knowledge as central to this process. On the other hand, as a contribution to the consideration of control in contemporary work, Sewell's analysis is not very adequate from both an empirical and a conceptual point of view.

AB - Critiques of the over-optimistic claims of theories of the knowledge economy and management are increasing (Thompson et al., 2001; Brown and Hesketh, 2004; McKinlay, 2005) and it is always good to add another to the fold. Graham Sewell's article in this issue makes a welcome interrogation of the rhetoric of empowerment and commitment associated with knowledge work and points to the persistence of control relations within the management of expert labour. The article rightly focuses on managerial attempts to codify and convert tacit knowledge as central to this process. On the other hand, as a contribution to the consideration of control in contemporary work, Sewell's analysis is not very adequate from both an empirical and a conceptual point of view.

KW - human resource management

KW - knowledge economy

KW - employment

KW - work

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350508405055944

U2 - 10.1177/1350508405055944

DO - 10.1177/1350508405055944

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 705

EP - 710

JO - Organization

T2 - Organization

JF - Organization

SN - 1350-5084

IS - 5

ER -