Abstract
Of the many areas where global health legal scholars disagree, one of the more urgent matters in the context of new rules on health emergencies is whether a multilateral system on Access and Benefits Sharing [ABS] will work in health.
In today’s guest essay, written in response to an earlier one [Squaring The Circle On Equity in a Pathogen Access And Benefit Sharing System], scholars argue that the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework is not the ideal model for a new ABS mechanism. They are of the view that the proposed ABS mechanism - as framed in transactional terms - will not address the goals of equity.
In today’s guest essay, written in response to an earlier one [Squaring The Circle On Equity in a Pathogen Access And Benefit Sharing System], scholars argue that the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework is not the ideal model for a new ABS mechanism. They are of the view that the proposed ABS mechanism - as framed in transactional terms - will not address the goals of equity.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Specialist publication | Geneva Health Files |
Publication status | Published - 15 Nov 2023 |
Keywords
- access and benefit sharing (ABS)
- international law
- pandemic