A human right to science? Precarious labor and basic rights in science and bioprospecting

Benjamin D. Neimark, Saskia Vermeylen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

Does everyone have the right to benefit from science? If so, what shape should benefits take? This article exposes the inequalities involved in bioprospecting through a relatively neglected human right, the right to benefit from science (HRS). Although underexplored in the literature, it is acknowledged that market-based conservation practices, such as bioprospecting, often rely on cheap “casual” labor. In contrast to critical discourses exposing the exploitation and misappropriation of indigenous people's cultural and self-determination rights in relation to bioprospecting (i.e., biopiracy), the exploitation of a low-skilled labor force for science has been little examined from a human rights perspective. Reliance on cheap labor is not limited just to those directly involved in creating local biodiversity inventories but constitutes a whole set of other workers (cooks, porters, and logistical support staff), who contribute indirectly to the advancements of science and whose contribution is barely acknowledged, let alone financially remunerated. As precarious workers, it is difficult for laborers to use existing national and international labor laws to fight for recognition of their basic rights or easily to rely on biodiversity and environmental laws to negotiate recognition of their contribution to science. We explore to what extent the HRS can be used to encourage governments, civil society, and companies to provide basic labor and social rights to science. This should be of keen interest to geographers, who for the most part have limited engagement in human rights law, and has wider significance for those interested in exploitative labor and rights violations in the emerging bio- and green economy.
LanguageEnglish
Pages167-182
Number of pages16
JournalAnnals of the Association of American Geographers
Volume107
Issue number1
Early online date30 Sep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

human rights
labor
science
biodiversity
international labor law
exploitation
skilled labor
worker
self determination
social rights
environmental law
civil society
self-determination
labor force
rights
conservation
staff
market
economy
Law

Keywords

  • Africa
  • bioprospecting
  • conservation
  • human rights
  • labour
  • Madagascar

Cite this

@article{94817acda754486598188fa48617282c,
title = "A human right to science? Precarious labor and basic rights in science and bioprospecting",
abstract = "Does everyone have the right to benefit from science? If so, what shape should benefits take? This article exposes the inequalities involved in bioprospecting through a relatively neglected human right, the right to benefit from science (HRS). Although underexplored in the literature, it is acknowledged that market-based conservation practices, such as bioprospecting, often rely on cheap “casual” labor. In contrast to critical discourses exposing the exploitation and misappropriation of indigenous people's cultural and self-determination rights in relation to bioprospecting (i.e., biopiracy), the exploitation of a low-skilled labor force for science has been little examined from a human rights perspective. Reliance on cheap labor is not limited just to those directly involved in creating local biodiversity inventories but constitutes a whole set of other workers (cooks, porters, and logistical support staff), who contribute indirectly to the advancements of science and whose contribution is barely acknowledged, let alone financially remunerated. As precarious workers, it is difficult for laborers to use existing national and international labor laws to fight for recognition of their basic rights or easily to rely on biodiversity and environmental laws to negotiate recognition of their contribution to science. We explore to what extent the HRS can be used to encourage governments, civil society, and companies to provide basic labor and social rights to science. This should be of keen interest to geographers, who for the most part have limited engagement in human rights law, and has wider significance for those interested in exploitative labor and rights violations in the emerging bio- and green economy.",
keywords = "Africa, bioprospecting, conservation, human rights, labour, Madagascar",
author = "Neimark, {Benjamin D.} and Saskia Vermeylen",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1080/24694452.2016.1218749",
language = "English",
volume = "107",
pages = "167--182",
journal = "Annals of the Association of American Geographers",
issn = "0004-5608",
number = "1",

}

A human right to science? Precarious labor and basic rights in science and bioprospecting. / Neimark, Benjamin D.; Vermeylen, Saskia.

In: Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 107, No. 1, 31.01.2017, p. 167-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A human right to science? Precarious labor and basic rights in science and bioprospecting

AU - Neimark, Benjamin D.

AU - Vermeylen, Saskia

PY - 2017/1/31

Y1 - 2017/1/31

N2 - Does everyone have the right to benefit from science? If so, what shape should benefits take? This article exposes the inequalities involved in bioprospecting through a relatively neglected human right, the right to benefit from science (HRS). Although underexplored in the literature, it is acknowledged that market-based conservation practices, such as bioprospecting, often rely on cheap “casual” labor. In contrast to critical discourses exposing the exploitation and misappropriation of indigenous people's cultural and self-determination rights in relation to bioprospecting (i.e., biopiracy), the exploitation of a low-skilled labor force for science has been little examined from a human rights perspective. Reliance on cheap labor is not limited just to those directly involved in creating local biodiversity inventories but constitutes a whole set of other workers (cooks, porters, and logistical support staff), who contribute indirectly to the advancements of science and whose contribution is barely acknowledged, let alone financially remunerated. As precarious workers, it is difficult for laborers to use existing national and international labor laws to fight for recognition of their basic rights or easily to rely on biodiversity and environmental laws to negotiate recognition of their contribution to science. We explore to what extent the HRS can be used to encourage governments, civil society, and companies to provide basic labor and social rights to science. This should be of keen interest to geographers, who for the most part have limited engagement in human rights law, and has wider significance for those interested in exploitative labor and rights violations in the emerging bio- and green economy.

AB - Does everyone have the right to benefit from science? If so, what shape should benefits take? This article exposes the inequalities involved in bioprospecting through a relatively neglected human right, the right to benefit from science (HRS). Although underexplored in the literature, it is acknowledged that market-based conservation practices, such as bioprospecting, often rely on cheap “casual” labor. In contrast to critical discourses exposing the exploitation and misappropriation of indigenous people's cultural and self-determination rights in relation to bioprospecting (i.e., biopiracy), the exploitation of a low-skilled labor force for science has been little examined from a human rights perspective. Reliance on cheap labor is not limited just to those directly involved in creating local biodiversity inventories but constitutes a whole set of other workers (cooks, porters, and logistical support staff), who contribute indirectly to the advancements of science and whose contribution is barely acknowledged, let alone financially remunerated. As precarious workers, it is difficult for laborers to use existing national and international labor laws to fight for recognition of their basic rights or easily to rely on biodiversity and environmental laws to negotiate recognition of their contribution to science. We explore to what extent the HRS can be used to encourage governments, civil society, and companies to provide basic labor and social rights to science. This should be of keen interest to geographers, who for the most part have limited engagement in human rights law, and has wider significance for those interested in exploitative labor and rights violations in the emerging bio- and green economy.

KW - Africa

KW - bioprospecting

KW - conservation

KW - human rights

KW - labour

KW - Madagascar

U2 - 10.1080/24694452.2016.1218749

DO - 10.1080/24694452.2016.1218749

M3 - Article

VL - 107

SP - 167

EP - 182

JO - Annals of the Association of American Geographers

T2 - Annals of the Association of American Geographers

JF - Annals of the Association of American Geographers

SN - 0004-5608

IS - 1

ER -