A fully implicit multi-axial solution strategy for direct ratchet boundary evaluation

theoretical development

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

42 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Ensuring sufficient safety against ratchet is a fundamental requirement in pressure vessel design. Determining the ratchet boundary can prove difficult and computationally expensive when using a full elastic-plastic finite element analysis and a number of direct methods have been proposed that overcome the difficulties associated with ratchet boundary evaluation. Here, a new approach based on fully implicit Finite Element methods, similar to conventional elastic-plastic methods, is presented. The method utilizes a two-stage procedure. The first stage determines the cyclic stress state, which can include a varying residual stress component, by repeatedly converging on the solution for the different loads by superposition of elastic stress solutions using a modified elastic-plastic solution. The second stage calculates the constant loads which can be added to the steady cycle whilst ensuring the equivalent stresses remain below a modified yield strength. During stage 2 the modified yield strength is updated throughout the analysis, thus satisfying Melan’s Lower bound ratchet theorem. This is achieved utilizing the same elastic plastic model as the first stage, and a modified radial return method. The proposed methods are shown to provide better agreement with upper bound ratchet methods than other lower bound ratchet methods, however limitations in these are identified and discussed.
Original languageEnglish
PagesArticle PVP2012-78314
Number of pages30
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2012
Event2012 ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference - Toronto, Canada
Duration: 15 Jul 201220 Jul 2012

Conference

Conference2012 ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference
CountryCanada
CityToronto
Period15/07/1220/07/12

Fingerprint

Ratchet
Plastics
Evaluation
Yield stress
Finite element method
Pressure vessels
Lower bound
Two-stage Procedure
Loads (forces)
Residual stresses
Implicit Method
Residual Stress
Direct Method
Vessel
Superposition
Strategy
Safety
Finite Element Method
Sufficient
Finite Element

Keywords

  • lower bound
  • ratchet boundary
  • pressure vessel design
  • finite element method
  • upper bound

Cite this

Jappy, A., Mackenzie, D., & Chen, H. (2012). A fully implicit multi-axial solution strategy for direct ratchet boundary evaluation: theoretical development. Article PVP2012-78314. Paper presented at 2012 ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference, Toronto, Canada.
Jappy, Alan ; Mackenzie, Donald ; Chen, Haofeng. / A fully implicit multi-axial solution strategy for direct ratchet boundary evaluation : theoretical development. Paper presented at 2012 ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference, Toronto, Canada.30 p.
@conference{09b177e8239d4d30a017d56bd28df8e6,
title = "A fully implicit multi-axial solution strategy for direct ratchet boundary evaluation: theoretical development",
abstract = "Ensuring sufficient safety against ratchet is a fundamental requirement in pressure vessel design. Determining the ratchet boundary can prove difficult and computationally expensive when using a full elastic-plastic finite element analysis and a number of direct methods have been proposed that overcome the difficulties associated with ratchet boundary evaluation. Here, a new approach based on fully implicit Finite Element methods, similar to conventional elastic-plastic methods, is presented. The method utilizes a two-stage procedure. The first stage determines the cyclic stress state, which can include a varying residual stress component, by repeatedly converging on the solution for the different loads by superposition of elastic stress solutions using a modified elastic-plastic solution. The second stage calculates the constant loads which can be added to the steady cycle whilst ensuring the equivalent stresses remain below a modified yield strength. During stage 2 the modified yield strength is updated throughout the analysis, thus satisfying Melan’s Lower bound ratchet theorem. This is achieved utilizing the same elastic plastic model as the first stage, and a modified radial return method. The proposed methods are shown to provide better agreement with upper bound ratchet methods than other lower bound ratchet methods, however limitations in these are identified and discussed.",
keywords = "lower bound, ratchet boundary, pressure vessel design, finite element method, upper bound",
author = "Alan Jappy and Donald Mackenzie and Haofeng Chen",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "15",
language = "English",
pages = "Article PVP2012--78314",
note = "2012 ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference ; Conference date: 15-07-2012 Through 20-07-2012",

}

Jappy, A, Mackenzie, D & Chen, H 2012, 'A fully implicit multi-axial solution strategy for direct ratchet boundary evaluation: theoretical development' Paper presented at 2012 ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference, Toronto, Canada, 15/07/12 - 20/07/12, pp. Article PVP2012-78314.

A fully implicit multi-axial solution strategy for direct ratchet boundary evaluation : theoretical development. / Jappy, Alan; Mackenzie, Donald; Chen, Haofeng.

2012. Article PVP2012-78314 Paper presented at 2012 ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference, Toronto, Canada.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - A fully implicit multi-axial solution strategy for direct ratchet boundary evaluation

T2 - theoretical development

AU - Jappy, Alan

AU - Mackenzie, Donald

AU - Chen, Haofeng

PY - 2012/7/15

Y1 - 2012/7/15

N2 - Ensuring sufficient safety against ratchet is a fundamental requirement in pressure vessel design. Determining the ratchet boundary can prove difficult and computationally expensive when using a full elastic-plastic finite element analysis and a number of direct methods have been proposed that overcome the difficulties associated with ratchet boundary evaluation. Here, a new approach based on fully implicit Finite Element methods, similar to conventional elastic-plastic methods, is presented. The method utilizes a two-stage procedure. The first stage determines the cyclic stress state, which can include a varying residual stress component, by repeatedly converging on the solution for the different loads by superposition of elastic stress solutions using a modified elastic-plastic solution. The second stage calculates the constant loads which can be added to the steady cycle whilst ensuring the equivalent stresses remain below a modified yield strength. During stage 2 the modified yield strength is updated throughout the analysis, thus satisfying Melan’s Lower bound ratchet theorem. This is achieved utilizing the same elastic plastic model as the first stage, and a modified radial return method. The proposed methods are shown to provide better agreement with upper bound ratchet methods than other lower bound ratchet methods, however limitations in these are identified and discussed.

AB - Ensuring sufficient safety against ratchet is a fundamental requirement in pressure vessel design. Determining the ratchet boundary can prove difficult and computationally expensive when using a full elastic-plastic finite element analysis and a number of direct methods have been proposed that overcome the difficulties associated with ratchet boundary evaluation. Here, a new approach based on fully implicit Finite Element methods, similar to conventional elastic-plastic methods, is presented. The method utilizes a two-stage procedure. The first stage determines the cyclic stress state, which can include a varying residual stress component, by repeatedly converging on the solution for the different loads by superposition of elastic stress solutions using a modified elastic-plastic solution. The second stage calculates the constant loads which can be added to the steady cycle whilst ensuring the equivalent stresses remain below a modified yield strength. During stage 2 the modified yield strength is updated throughout the analysis, thus satisfying Melan’s Lower bound ratchet theorem. This is achieved utilizing the same elastic plastic model as the first stage, and a modified radial return method. The proposed methods are shown to provide better agreement with upper bound ratchet methods than other lower bound ratchet methods, however limitations in these are identified and discussed.

KW - lower bound

KW - ratchet boundary

KW - pressure vessel design

KW - finite element method

KW - upper bound

UR - http://www.asmeconferences.org/pvp2012/

M3 - Paper

SP - Article PVP2012-78314

ER -

Jappy A, Mackenzie D, Chen H. A fully implicit multi-axial solution strategy for direct ratchet boundary evaluation: theoretical development. 2012. Paper presented at 2012 ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference, Toronto, Canada.