A discernable and manageable standard for partisan gerrymandering

Anthony J. McGann, Charles Anthony Smith, Michael Latner, J. Alex Keena

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

815 Downloads (Pure)


The case of Veith v. Jubelirer (2004) challenges us to find a standard for partisan gerrymandering that is judicially discernable and manageable. Without such a standard even the most egregious partisan gerrymanders cannot be effectively challenged. However, we argue that the way to find a suitable standard is not to embark on a quest for a “new” standard. Rather it is to take the existing valid measures that science gives us, and show that these can be grounded in constitutionally protected rights. Using recent results in social choice theory, we show that the existing partisan symmetry standard can be derived from an individual right to equal protection. We also show that the existing technology for measuring partisan symmetry can provide a judicially manageable test for partisan bias.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)295-311
Number of pages17
JournalElection Law Journal
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 17 Dec 2015


  • Veith v. Jubelirer
  • partisan gerrymandering
  • measuring partisan symmetry


Dive into the research topics of 'A discernable and manageable standard for partisan gerrymandering'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this