A discernable and manageable standard for partisan gerrymandering

Anthony J. McGann, Charles Anthony Smith, Michael Latner, J. Alex Keena

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

808 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The case of Veith v. Jubelirer (2004) challenges us to find a standard for partisan gerrymandering that is judicially discernable and manageable. Without such a standard even the most egregious partisan gerrymanders cannot be effectively challenged. However, we argue that the way to find a suitable standard is not to embark on a quest for a “new” standard. Rather it is to take the existing valid measures that science gives us, and show that these can be grounded in constitutionally protected rights. Using recent results in social choice theory, we show that the existing partisan symmetry standard can be derived from an individual right to equal protection. We also show that the existing technology for measuring partisan symmetry can provide a judicially manageable test for partisan bias.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)295-311
Number of pages17
JournalElection Law Journal
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

trend
science

Keywords

  • Veith v. Jubelirer
  • partisan gerrymandering
  • measuring partisan symmetry

Cite this

McGann, Anthony J. ; Smith, Charles Anthony ; Latner, Michael ; Keena, J. Alex. / A discernable and manageable standard for partisan gerrymandering. In: Election Law Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 295-311.
@article{96d02b5025ba48bcabc5d1182a344186,
title = "A discernable and manageable standard for partisan gerrymandering",
abstract = "The case of Veith v. Jubelirer (2004) challenges us to find a standard for partisan gerrymandering that is judicially discernable and manageable. Without such a standard even the most egregious partisan gerrymanders cannot be effectively challenged. However, we argue that the way to find a suitable standard is not to embark on a quest for a “new” standard. Rather it is to take the existing valid measures that science gives us, and show that these can be grounded in constitutionally protected rights. Using recent results in social choice theory, we show that the existing partisan symmetry standard can be derived from an individual right to equal protection. We also show that the existing technology for measuring partisan symmetry can provide a judicially manageable test for partisan bias.",
keywords = "Veith v. Jubelirer, partisan gerrymandering, measuring partisan symmetry",
author = "McGann, {Anthony J.} and Smith, {Charles Anthony} and Michael Latner and Keena, {J. Alex}",
note = "Final publication is available from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/elj.2015.0312 Accepted for publication 11 October 2015",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1089/elj.2015.0312",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "295--311",
journal = "Election Law Journal",
issn = "1533-1296",
number = "4",

}

A discernable and manageable standard for partisan gerrymandering. / McGann, Anthony J.; Smith, Charles Anthony; Latner, Michael; Keena, J. Alex.

In: Election Law Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, 17.12.2015, p. 295-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A discernable and manageable standard for partisan gerrymandering

AU - McGann, Anthony J.

AU - Smith, Charles Anthony

AU - Latner, Michael

AU - Keena, J. Alex

N1 - Final publication is available from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/elj.2015.0312 Accepted for publication 11 October 2015

PY - 2015/12/17

Y1 - 2015/12/17

N2 - The case of Veith v. Jubelirer (2004) challenges us to find a standard for partisan gerrymandering that is judicially discernable and manageable. Without such a standard even the most egregious partisan gerrymanders cannot be effectively challenged. However, we argue that the way to find a suitable standard is not to embark on a quest for a “new” standard. Rather it is to take the existing valid measures that science gives us, and show that these can be grounded in constitutionally protected rights. Using recent results in social choice theory, we show that the existing partisan symmetry standard can be derived from an individual right to equal protection. We also show that the existing technology for measuring partisan symmetry can provide a judicially manageable test for partisan bias.

AB - The case of Veith v. Jubelirer (2004) challenges us to find a standard for partisan gerrymandering that is judicially discernable and manageable. Without such a standard even the most egregious partisan gerrymanders cannot be effectively challenged. However, we argue that the way to find a suitable standard is not to embark on a quest for a “new” standard. Rather it is to take the existing valid measures that science gives us, and show that these can be grounded in constitutionally protected rights. Using recent results in social choice theory, we show that the existing partisan symmetry standard can be derived from an individual right to equal protection. We also show that the existing technology for measuring partisan symmetry can provide a judicially manageable test for partisan bias.

KW - Veith v. Jubelirer

KW - partisan gerrymandering

KW - measuring partisan symmetry

UR - http://www.liebertpub.com/elj

U2 - 10.1089/elj.2015.0312

DO - 10.1089/elj.2015.0312

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 295

EP - 311

JO - Election Law Journal

JF - Election Law Journal

SN - 1533-1296

IS - 4

ER -