A database as a method of raising typological questions about poetic form

Nigel Fabb, Stefano Versace

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution book

Abstract

For many languages, there are ‘verbal arts’ (written, spoken or sung), which
involve additional regulation of language and other kinds of structure. Certain
kinds of regulation are cross‐linguistically common, including division of a text
into lines and sub‐ and super‐line structure (verse), counting and rhythmic
organization of syllables or similar units (metre), repetition‐with‐variation at the
word or higher syntactic level (parallelism), repetition of parts of syllables
(alliteration or rhyme), control over the placement of word boundaries (caesura
and bridge rules), etc. There are no general typologies relating to these poetic
forms (at most, there are partial surveys, usually in the form of histories).
What might a general typology for a very large number of poetic (including song) traditions from around the world tell linguists? We would understand how widespread certain language‐based poetic forms are, and whether related forms are generally historically‐culturally linked. We could ask in what ways forms can combine (e.g., kinds of rhyme with kinds of metre), what combinations are not found (Jakobson argued that metre and parallelism were almost never found together), and, when forms do co‐occur, whether they interact with one another or are best understood as entirely independent constraints on the text. With a sufficiently wide range of data we would be able to test hypotheses about how forms differ (e.g., the possibility that alliteration is always local, whereas rhyme can be non‐local). We can also correlate poetic forms with linguistic forms, particularly in the phonology, to test the ‘development hypothesis’ according to which linguistic accounts of poetry assume that the specific forms in a given poetry arise from phonological and other forms specific to its language (such that a poetry is matched to, or determined by the language). We discuss our construction of a (publicly available) prototype database for a number of poetic traditions in a sample set of languages: English, Old Hittite, Italian, Maltese, Khalkha Mongolian, Somali, and Bora. The database is structured as a set of questions, which can be addressed to any poetic tradition; we discuss how the questions are formulated, and how they help us make new discoveries. We look at how the structure of the database itself, and the questions it encourages us to ask, can lead us to new ways of thinking about poetic form, and its relation to language. We show this by looking at the specific case of Tswana and how the database‐procedure makes possible to discover a metrical form which was previously unsuspected for the languages of the sub‐Saharan area (cf. Greenberg 1960). Because the database includes any kind of language‐based regularity in
poetry, it enables a more holistic account of the connection between poetic form
and linguistic form, as well as of the relations between poetic forms, than has
previously been available. The construction of a database, as an empirical
methodology in the investigation of poetries in a wide variety of languages, thus
raises new theoretical and typological questions about the data.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of conference on language documentation & linguistic theory 3
EditorsPeter Austin, Oliver Bond, David Nathan, Lutz Marten
Place of PublicationLondon
Pages289-296
Number of pages8
Publication statusPublished - 2011
EventLanguage Documentation & Linguistic Theory 3 - London, United Kingdom
Duration: 18 Nov 201120 Nov 2011

Conference

ConferenceLanguage Documentation & Linguistic Theory 3
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityLondon
Period18/11/1120/11/11

Fingerprint

Language
Poetic Form
Data Base
Poetry
Rhyme
Linguistic Form
Poetic Tradition
Poetics
Parallelism
Alliteration
Verse
Old Hittite
Prototype
Placement
Art
Song
Hypothesis Test
Regularity
Phonology
Syntax

Keywords

  • database
  • method
  • typological questions
  • poetic form
  • raising

Cite this

Fabb, N., & Versace, S. (2011). A database as a method of raising typological questions about poetic form. In P. Austin, O. Bond, D. Nathan, & L. Marten (Eds.), Proceedings of conference on language documentation & linguistic theory 3 (pp. 289-296). London.
Fabb, Nigel ; Versace, Stefano. / A database as a method of raising typological questions about poetic form. Proceedings of conference on language documentation & linguistic theory 3. editor / Peter Austin ; Oliver Bond ; David Nathan ; Lutz Marten. London, 2011. pp. 289-296
@inproceedings{48b072a9971c4906ada188987c040cc6,
title = "A database as a method of raising typological questions about poetic form",
abstract = "For many languages, there are ‘verbal arts’ (written, spoken or sung), whichinvolve additional regulation of language and other kinds of structure. Certainkinds of regulation are cross‐linguistically common, including division of a textinto lines and sub‐ and super‐line structure (verse), counting and rhythmicorganization of syllables or similar units (metre), repetition‐with‐variation at theword or higher syntactic level (parallelism), repetition of parts of syllables(alliteration or rhyme), control over the placement of word boundaries (caesuraand bridge rules), etc. There are no general typologies relating to these poeticforms (at most, there are partial surveys, usually in the form of histories).What might a general typology for a very large number of poetic (including song) traditions from around the world tell linguists? We would understand how widespread certain language‐based poetic forms are, and whether related forms are generally historically‐culturally linked. We could ask in what ways forms can combine (e.g., kinds of rhyme with kinds of metre), what combinations are not found (Jakobson argued that metre and parallelism were almost never found together), and, when forms do co‐occur, whether they interact with one another or are best understood as entirely independent constraints on the text. With a sufficiently wide range of data we would be able to test hypotheses about how forms differ (e.g., the possibility that alliteration is always local, whereas rhyme can be non‐local). We can also correlate poetic forms with linguistic forms, particularly in the phonology, to test the ‘development hypothesis’ according to which linguistic accounts of poetry assume that the specific forms in a given poetry arise from phonological and other forms specific to its language (such that a poetry is matched to, or determined by the language). We discuss our construction of a (publicly available) prototype database for a number of poetic traditions in a sample set of languages: English, Old Hittite, Italian, Maltese, Khalkha Mongolian, Somali, and Bora. The database is structured as a set of questions, which can be addressed to any poetic tradition; we discuss how the questions are formulated, and how they help us make new discoveries. We look at how the structure of the database itself, and the questions it encourages us to ask, can lead us to new ways of thinking about poetic form, and its relation to language. We show this by looking at the specific case of Tswana and how the database‐procedure makes possible to discover a metrical form which was previously unsuspected for the languages of the sub‐Saharan area (cf. Greenberg 1960). Because the database includes any kind of language‐based regularity inpoetry, it enables a more holistic account of the connection between poetic formand linguistic form, as well as of the relations between poetic forms, than haspreviously been available. The construction of a database, as an empiricalmethodology in the investigation of poetries in a wide variety of languages, thusraises new theoretical and typological questions about the data.",
keywords = "database, method, typological questions, poetic form, raising",
author = "Nigel Fabb and Stefano Versace",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780728603981",
pages = "289--296",
editor = "Peter Austin and Oliver Bond and David Nathan and Lutz Marten",
booktitle = "Proceedings of conference on language documentation & linguistic theory 3",

}

Fabb, N & Versace, S 2011, A database as a method of raising typological questions about poetic form. in P Austin, O Bond, D Nathan & L Marten (eds), Proceedings of conference on language documentation & linguistic theory 3. London, pp. 289-296, Language Documentation & Linguistic Theory 3, London, United Kingdom, 18/11/11.

A database as a method of raising typological questions about poetic form. / Fabb, Nigel; Versace, Stefano.

Proceedings of conference on language documentation & linguistic theory 3. ed. / Peter Austin; Oliver Bond; David Nathan; Lutz Marten. London, 2011. p. 289-296.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution book

TY - GEN

T1 - A database as a method of raising typological questions about poetic form

AU - Fabb, Nigel

AU - Versace, Stefano

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - For many languages, there are ‘verbal arts’ (written, spoken or sung), whichinvolve additional regulation of language and other kinds of structure. Certainkinds of regulation are cross‐linguistically common, including division of a textinto lines and sub‐ and super‐line structure (verse), counting and rhythmicorganization of syllables or similar units (metre), repetition‐with‐variation at theword or higher syntactic level (parallelism), repetition of parts of syllables(alliteration or rhyme), control over the placement of word boundaries (caesuraand bridge rules), etc. There are no general typologies relating to these poeticforms (at most, there are partial surveys, usually in the form of histories).What might a general typology for a very large number of poetic (including song) traditions from around the world tell linguists? We would understand how widespread certain language‐based poetic forms are, and whether related forms are generally historically‐culturally linked. We could ask in what ways forms can combine (e.g., kinds of rhyme with kinds of metre), what combinations are not found (Jakobson argued that metre and parallelism were almost never found together), and, when forms do co‐occur, whether they interact with one another or are best understood as entirely independent constraints on the text. With a sufficiently wide range of data we would be able to test hypotheses about how forms differ (e.g., the possibility that alliteration is always local, whereas rhyme can be non‐local). We can also correlate poetic forms with linguistic forms, particularly in the phonology, to test the ‘development hypothesis’ according to which linguistic accounts of poetry assume that the specific forms in a given poetry arise from phonological and other forms specific to its language (such that a poetry is matched to, or determined by the language). We discuss our construction of a (publicly available) prototype database for a number of poetic traditions in a sample set of languages: English, Old Hittite, Italian, Maltese, Khalkha Mongolian, Somali, and Bora. The database is structured as a set of questions, which can be addressed to any poetic tradition; we discuss how the questions are formulated, and how they help us make new discoveries. We look at how the structure of the database itself, and the questions it encourages us to ask, can lead us to new ways of thinking about poetic form, and its relation to language. We show this by looking at the specific case of Tswana and how the database‐procedure makes possible to discover a metrical form which was previously unsuspected for the languages of the sub‐Saharan area (cf. Greenberg 1960). Because the database includes any kind of language‐based regularity inpoetry, it enables a more holistic account of the connection between poetic formand linguistic form, as well as of the relations between poetic forms, than haspreviously been available. The construction of a database, as an empiricalmethodology in the investigation of poetries in a wide variety of languages, thusraises new theoretical and typological questions about the data.

AB - For many languages, there are ‘verbal arts’ (written, spoken or sung), whichinvolve additional regulation of language and other kinds of structure. Certainkinds of regulation are cross‐linguistically common, including division of a textinto lines and sub‐ and super‐line structure (verse), counting and rhythmicorganization of syllables or similar units (metre), repetition‐with‐variation at theword or higher syntactic level (parallelism), repetition of parts of syllables(alliteration or rhyme), control over the placement of word boundaries (caesuraand bridge rules), etc. There are no general typologies relating to these poeticforms (at most, there are partial surveys, usually in the form of histories).What might a general typology for a very large number of poetic (including song) traditions from around the world tell linguists? We would understand how widespread certain language‐based poetic forms are, and whether related forms are generally historically‐culturally linked. We could ask in what ways forms can combine (e.g., kinds of rhyme with kinds of metre), what combinations are not found (Jakobson argued that metre and parallelism were almost never found together), and, when forms do co‐occur, whether they interact with one another or are best understood as entirely independent constraints on the text. With a sufficiently wide range of data we would be able to test hypotheses about how forms differ (e.g., the possibility that alliteration is always local, whereas rhyme can be non‐local). We can also correlate poetic forms with linguistic forms, particularly in the phonology, to test the ‘development hypothesis’ according to which linguistic accounts of poetry assume that the specific forms in a given poetry arise from phonological and other forms specific to its language (such that a poetry is matched to, or determined by the language). We discuss our construction of a (publicly available) prototype database for a number of poetic traditions in a sample set of languages: English, Old Hittite, Italian, Maltese, Khalkha Mongolian, Somali, and Bora. The database is structured as a set of questions, which can be addressed to any poetic tradition; we discuss how the questions are formulated, and how they help us make new discoveries. We look at how the structure of the database itself, and the questions it encourages us to ask, can lead us to new ways of thinking about poetic form, and its relation to language. We show this by looking at the specific case of Tswana and how the database‐procedure makes possible to discover a metrical form which was previously unsuspected for the languages of the sub‐Saharan area (cf. Greenberg 1960). Because the database includes any kind of language‐based regularity inpoetry, it enables a more holistic account of the connection between poetic formand linguistic form, as well as of the relations between poetic forms, than haspreviously been available. The construction of a database, as an empiricalmethodology in the investigation of poetries in a wide variety of languages, thusraises new theoretical and typological questions about the data.

KW - database

KW - method

KW - typological questions

KW - poetic form

KW - raising

UR - http://www.hrelp.org/events/LDLT3/

M3 - Conference contribution book

SN - 9780728603981

SP - 289

EP - 296

BT - Proceedings of conference on language documentation & linguistic theory 3

A2 - Austin, Peter

A2 - Bond, Oliver

A2 - Nathan, David

A2 - Marten, Lutz

CY - London

ER -

Fabb N, Versace S. A database as a method of raising typological questions about poetic form. In Austin P, Bond O, Nathan D, Marten L, editors, Proceedings of conference on language documentation & linguistic theory 3. London. 2011. p. 289-296