A critique of GERS: government expenditure and revenue in Scotland

Jim Cuthbert, Margaret Cuthbert, Brian Ashcroft (Editor), Eleanor Malloy (Editor), Sarah Le Tissier (Editor)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper represents a critique of the government's published report on "Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland", (commonly referred to as GERS). There are, in fact, two levels at which such a critique might be approached. The first is primarily philosophical, and would be concerned with fundamental questions such as "what is the purpose of a GERS exercise and how relevant are the results to different time periods or constitutional arrangements?" The second is concerned primarily with practical issues: notably the adequacy of the methodology used and the accuracy of data sources. In the main, this paper deals with the second level of approach, although we return briefly in the final section to consider more philosophical issues.
LanguageEnglish
Pages49-58
Number of pages10
JournalQuarterly Economic Commentary
Volume24
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 1998

Fingerprint

Government expenditure
Government revenue
Government
Data sources
Adequacy
Scotland
Methodology
Exercise

Keywords

  • Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland (GERS)
  • Scotland
  • public funding
  • public expenditure

Cite this

Cuthbert, Jim ; Cuthbert, Margaret ; Ashcroft, Brian (Editor) ; Malloy, Eleanor (Editor) ; Le Tissier, Sarah (Editor). / A critique of GERS : government expenditure and revenue in Scotland. In: Quarterly Economic Commentary. 1998 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 49-58
@article{5e11a760f5bb489581b4ef5aa04ccea6,
title = "A critique of GERS: government expenditure and revenue in Scotland",
abstract = "This paper represents a critique of the government's published report on {"}Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland{"}, (commonly referred to as GERS). There are, in fact, two levels at which such a critique might be approached. The first is primarily philosophical, and would be concerned with fundamental questions such as {"}what is the purpose of a GERS exercise and how relevant are the results to different time periods or constitutional arrangements?{"} The second is concerned primarily with practical issues: notably the adequacy of the methodology used and the accuracy of data sources. In the main, this paper deals with the second level of approach, although we return briefly in the final section to consider more philosophical issues.",
keywords = "Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland (GERS), Scotland, public funding, public expenditure",
author = "Jim Cuthbert and Margaret Cuthbert and Brian Ashcroft and Eleanor Malloy and {Le Tissier}, Sarah",
year = "1998",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "49--58",
journal = "Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary",
issn = "2046-5378",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
number = "1",

}

A critique of GERS : government expenditure and revenue in Scotland. / Cuthbert, Jim; Cuthbert, Margaret; Ashcroft, Brian (Editor); Malloy, Eleanor (Editor); Le Tissier, Sarah (Editor).

In: Quarterly Economic Commentary, Vol. 24, No. 1, 12.1998, p. 49-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critique of GERS

T2 - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

AU - Cuthbert,Jim

AU - Cuthbert,Margaret

A2 - Ashcroft,Brian

A2 - Malloy,Eleanor

A2 - Le Tissier,Sarah

PY - 1998/12

Y1 - 1998/12

N2 - This paper represents a critique of the government's published report on "Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland", (commonly referred to as GERS). There are, in fact, two levels at which such a critique might be approached. The first is primarily philosophical, and would be concerned with fundamental questions such as "what is the purpose of a GERS exercise and how relevant are the results to different time periods or constitutional arrangements?" The second is concerned primarily with practical issues: notably the adequacy of the methodology used and the accuracy of data sources. In the main, this paper deals with the second level of approach, although we return briefly in the final section to consider more philosophical issues.

AB - This paper represents a critique of the government's published report on "Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland", (commonly referred to as GERS). There are, in fact, two levels at which such a critique might be approached. The first is primarily philosophical, and would be concerned with fundamental questions such as "what is the purpose of a GERS exercise and how relevant are the results to different time periods or constitutional arrangements?" The second is concerned primarily with practical issues: notably the adequacy of the methodology used and the accuracy of data sources. In the main, this paper deals with the second level of approach, although we return briefly in the final section to consider more philosophical issues.

KW - Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland (GERS)

KW - Scotland

KW - public funding

KW - public expenditure

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/frasercommentary/

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/fraser/

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 49

EP - 58

JO - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

JF - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

SN - 2046-5378

IS - 1

ER -