A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis

Linda (Miller) Renfrew, Anna C Lord, Angus K McFadyen, Danny Rafferty, Rebecca Hunter, Roy Bowers, Paul Mattison, Owen Moseley, Lorna Paul

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Foot drop affects walking in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). This study compares the initial orthotic effects of two treatments for foot drop: ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) and functional electrical stimulation (FES), on the speed and oxygen cost of walking in MS. Method and materials: Seventy-eight pwMS were randomised to receive AFO or FES (ODFS PACE (OML, Salisbury, UK)). Participants completed the 25-ft walk test (25ftWT) and 5-min self-selected walk test (5minSSWT), from which oxygen cost was determined, with and without their device. Between-, within- and sub-group analyses (based on baseline walking speed of <0.8 m/s (slow) or ≥0.8 m/s (fast)) were undertaken. Results: No significant differences between baseline measures were observed. The AFO group walked significantly slower than the FES group (5minSSWT, p = 0.037, 0.11 m/s). The AFO group walked significantly slower with than without AFO (25ftWT, p = 0.037), particularly in the fast-walking group ( p = 0.011). The slow-walking FES group walked significantly faster with FES than without (25ftWT; p = 0.029, 5minSSWT; p = 0.037). There were no differences in the fast-walking FES group or in the oxygen cost for either device. Conclusion: AFO reduced walking speed, particularly in fast walkers. FES increased walking speed in slow, but not fast walkers.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages9
Journal Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering
Volume5
Early online date2 Feb 2018
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - 2 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Orthotics
Oxygen
Costs

Keywords

  • ankle-foot orthosis
  • electrical stimulation
  • neurorehabilitation
  • orthotics
  • walking velocity

Cite this

Renfrew, Linda (Miller) ; Lord, Anna C ; McFadyen, Angus K ; Rafferty, Danny ; Hunter, Rebecca ; Bowers, Roy ; Mattison, Paul ; Moseley, Owen ; Paul, Lorna. / A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis. In: Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering. 2018 ; Vol. 5.
@article{2393ba4774d34e53a0c869e849274cb4,
title = "A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis",
abstract = "Foot drop affects walking in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). This study compares the initial orthotic effects of two treatments for foot drop: ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) and functional electrical stimulation (FES), on the speed and oxygen cost of walking in MS. Method and materials: Seventy-eight pwMS were randomised to receive AFO or FES (ODFS PACE (OML, Salisbury, UK)). Participants completed the 25-ft walk test (25ftWT) and 5-min self-selected walk test (5minSSWT), from which oxygen cost was determined, with and without their device. Between-, within- and sub-group analyses (based on baseline walking speed of <0.8 m/s (slow) or ≥0.8 m/s (fast)) were undertaken. Results: No significant differences between baseline measures were observed. The AFO group walked significantly slower than the FES group (5minSSWT, p = 0.037, 0.11 m/s). The AFO group walked significantly slower with than without AFO (25ftWT, p = 0.037), particularly in the fast-walking group ( p = 0.011). The slow-walking FES group walked significantly faster with FES than without (25ftWT; p = 0.029, 5minSSWT; p = 0.037). There were no differences in the fast-walking FES group or in the oxygen cost for either device. Conclusion: AFO reduced walking speed, particularly in fast walkers. FES increased walking speed in slow, but not fast walkers.",
keywords = "ankle-foot orthosis, electrical stimulation, neurorehabilitation, orthotics, walking velocity",
author = "Renfrew, {Linda (Miller)} and Lord, {Anna C} and McFadyen, {Angus K} and Danny Rafferty and Rebecca Hunter and Roy Bowers and Paul Mattison and Owen Moseley and Lorna Paul",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1177/2055668318755071",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering",
issn = "2055-6683",

}

A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis. / Renfrew, Linda (Miller); Lord, Anna C; McFadyen, Angus K; Rafferty, Danny; Hunter, Rebecca ; Bowers, Roy; Mattison, Paul ; Moseley, Owen; Paul, Lorna.

In: Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering, Vol. 5, 02.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis

AU - Renfrew,Linda (Miller)

AU - Lord,Anna C

AU - McFadyen,Angus K

AU - Rafferty,Danny

AU - Hunter,Rebecca

AU - Bowers,Roy

AU - Mattison,Paul

AU - Moseley,Owen

AU - Paul,Lorna

PY - 2018/2/2

Y1 - 2018/2/2

N2 - Foot drop affects walking in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). This study compares the initial orthotic effects of two treatments for foot drop: ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) and functional electrical stimulation (FES), on the speed and oxygen cost of walking in MS. Method and materials: Seventy-eight pwMS were randomised to receive AFO or FES (ODFS PACE (OML, Salisbury, UK)). Participants completed the 25-ft walk test (25ftWT) and 5-min self-selected walk test (5minSSWT), from which oxygen cost was determined, with and without their device. Between-, within- and sub-group analyses (based on baseline walking speed of <0.8 m/s (slow) or ≥0.8 m/s (fast)) were undertaken. Results: No significant differences between baseline measures were observed. The AFO group walked significantly slower than the FES group (5minSSWT, p = 0.037, 0.11 m/s). The AFO group walked significantly slower with than without AFO (25ftWT, p = 0.037), particularly in the fast-walking group ( p = 0.011). The slow-walking FES group walked significantly faster with FES than without (25ftWT; p = 0.029, 5minSSWT; p = 0.037). There were no differences in the fast-walking FES group or in the oxygen cost for either device. Conclusion: AFO reduced walking speed, particularly in fast walkers. FES increased walking speed in slow, but not fast walkers.

AB - Foot drop affects walking in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). This study compares the initial orthotic effects of two treatments for foot drop: ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) and functional electrical stimulation (FES), on the speed and oxygen cost of walking in MS. Method and materials: Seventy-eight pwMS were randomised to receive AFO or FES (ODFS PACE (OML, Salisbury, UK)). Participants completed the 25-ft walk test (25ftWT) and 5-min self-selected walk test (5minSSWT), from which oxygen cost was determined, with and without their device. Between-, within- and sub-group analyses (based on baseline walking speed of <0.8 m/s (slow) or ≥0.8 m/s (fast)) were undertaken. Results: No significant differences between baseline measures were observed. The AFO group walked significantly slower than the FES group (5minSSWT, p = 0.037, 0.11 m/s). The AFO group walked significantly slower with than without AFO (25ftWT, p = 0.037), particularly in the fast-walking group ( p = 0.011). The slow-walking FES group walked significantly faster with FES than without (25ftWT; p = 0.029, 5minSSWT; p = 0.037). There were no differences in the fast-walking FES group or in the oxygen cost for either device. Conclusion: AFO reduced walking speed, particularly in fast walkers. FES increased walking speed in slow, but not fast walkers.

KW - ankle-foot orthosis

KW - electrical stimulation

KW - neurorehabilitation

KW - orthotics

KW - walking velocity

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2055668318755071

U2 - 10.1177/2055668318755071

DO - 10.1177/2055668318755071

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering

T2 - Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering

JF - Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering

SN - 2055-6683

ER -