A comparison of strategic planning practices in companies from the UK and Turkey

Keith Glaister, Omer Dincer, Ekrem Tatoglu, Mehmet Demirbag

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    17 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the nature and practice of strategic planning in two different environmental contexts, the UK and Turkey. Employing a structured mail questionnaire, the study collected data from a sample of UK and Turkish firms. Using a sampling frame of 500 firms from the EXTEL database of UK listed companies, 113 usable responses were received for the UK firms. In total, 135 responses were obtained from the Turkish firms based on a sampling frame of 638 firms derived from the database of the Istanbul Chamber of Industry's 500 largest Turkish manufacturing companies and the database of companies quoted on the Istanbul Stock Exchange. There are a number of significant differences between the strategic planning practices of Turkish firms and UK firms. Contrary to expectations, it appears that Turkish firms rather than UK firms are more favourably disposed to strategic planning. The exception to this is the adoption and use of a range of tools/techniques of strategic analysis, which are more regularly employed by UK firms than by Turkish firms. Organisations should be aware that strategy formulation is futile without appropriate strategy implementation and should seek a coherent interface between those responsible for the strategic planning process and those responsible for implementation to ensure that each group is working to the same set of objectives. With the development of the market economy in Turkey, and the increased competition from foreign firms as globalisation proceeds, it may be necessary for the Turkish firms to increasingly adopt the techniques and tools of strategic planning. This paper provides some important insights to the applicability of Western strategic management thinking to the business environment in emerging countries.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages361-379
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Management Development
    Volume28
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    Strategic planning
    Turkey
    Data base
    Sampling
    Foreign firms
    Istanbul stock exchange
    Market economy
    Manufacturing companies
    Planning process
    Strategy implementation
    Strategic management
    Business environment
    Strategy formulation
    Globalization
    Listed companies
    Strategic analysis
    Industry
    Questionnaire
    Emerging countries

    Keywords

    • corporate strategy
    • cross cultural studies
    • strategic planning
    • Turkey

    Cite this

    Glaister, Keith ; Dincer, Omer ; Tatoglu, Ekrem ; Demirbag, Mehmet. / A comparison of strategic planning practices in companies from the UK and Turkey. In: Journal of Management Development. 2009 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 361-379.
    @article{e382e57374c84104b25b63846782fc2e,
    title = "A comparison of strategic planning practices in companies from the UK and Turkey",
    abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the nature and practice of strategic planning in two different environmental contexts, the UK and Turkey. Employing a structured mail questionnaire, the study collected data from a sample of UK and Turkish firms. Using a sampling frame of 500 firms from the EXTEL database of UK listed companies, 113 usable responses were received for the UK firms. In total, 135 responses were obtained from the Turkish firms based on a sampling frame of 638 firms derived from the database of the Istanbul Chamber of Industry's 500 largest Turkish manufacturing companies and the database of companies quoted on the Istanbul Stock Exchange. There are a number of significant differences between the strategic planning practices of Turkish firms and UK firms. Contrary to expectations, it appears that Turkish firms rather than UK firms are more favourably disposed to strategic planning. The exception to this is the adoption and use of a range of tools/techniques of strategic analysis, which are more regularly employed by UK firms than by Turkish firms. Organisations should be aware that strategy formulation is futile without appropriate strategy implementation and should seek a coherent interface between those responsible for the strategic planning process and those responsible for implementation to ensure that each group is working to the same set of objectives. With the development of the market economy in Turkey, and the increased competition from foreign firms as globalisation proceeds, it may be necessary for the Turkish firms to increasingly adopt the techniques and tools of strategic planning. This paper provides some important insights to the applicability of Western strategic management thinking to the business environment in emerging countries.",
    keywords = "corporate strategy, cross cultural studies, strategic planning, Turkey",
    author = "Keith Glaister and Omer Dincer and Ekrem Tatoglu and Mehmet Demirbag",
    year = "2009",
    doi = "10.1108/02621710910947380",
    language = "English",
    volume = "28",
    pages = "361--379",
    journal = "Journal of Management Development",
    issn = "0262-1711",
    publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
    number = "4",

    }

    A comparison of strategic planning practices in companies from the UK and Turkey. / Glaister, Keith; Dincer, Omer; Tatoglu, Ekrem; Demirbag, Mehmet.

    In: Journal of Management Development, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2009, p. 361-379.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A comparison of strategic planning practices in companies from the UK and Turkey

    AU - Glaister, Keith

    AU - Dincer, Omer

    AU - Tatoglu, Ekrem

    AU - Demirbag, Mehmet

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the nature and practice of strategic planning in two different environmental contexts, the UK and Turkey. Employing a structured mail questionnaire, the study collected data from a sample of UK and Turkish firms. Using a sampling frame of 500 firms from the EXTEL database of UK listed companies, 113 usable responses were received for the UK firms. In total, 135 responses were obtained from the Turkish firms based on a sampling frame of 638 firms derived from the database of the Istanbul Chamber of Industry's 500 largest Turkish manufacturing companies and the database of companies quoted on the Istanbul Stock Exchange. There are a number of significant differences between the strategic planning practices of Turkish firms and UK firms. Contrary to expectations, it appears that Turkish firms rather than UK firms are more favourably disposed to strategic planning. The exception to this is the adoption and use of a range of tools/techniques of strategic analysis, which are more regularly employed by UK firms than by Turkish firms. Organisations should be aware that strategy formulation is futile without appropriate strategy implementation and should seek a coherent interface between those responsible for the strategic planning process and those responsible for implementation to ensure that each group is working to the same set of objectives. With the development of the market economy in Turkey, and the increased competition from foreign firms as globalisation proceeds, it may be necessary for the Turkish firms to increasingly adopt the techniques and tools of strategic planning. This paper provides some important insights to the applicability of Western strategic management thinking to the business environment in emerging countries.

    AB - The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the nature and practice of strategic planning in two different environmental contexts, the UK and Turkey. Employing a structured mail questionnaire, the study collected data from a sample of UK and Turkish firms. Using a sampling frame of 500 firms from the EXTEL database of UK listed companies, 113 usable responses were received for the UK firms. In total, 135 responses were obtained from the Turkish firms based on a sampling frame of 638 firms derived from the database of the Istanbul Chamber of Industry's 500 largest Turkish manufacturing companies and the database of companies quoted on the Istanbul Stock Exchange. There are a number of significant differences between the strategic planning practices of Turkish firms and UK firms. Contrary to expectations, it appears that Turkish firms rather than UK firms are more favourably disposed to strategic planning. The exception to this is the adoption and use of a range of tools/techniques of strategic analysis, which are more regularly employed by UK firms than by Turkish firms. Organisations should be aware that strategy formulation is futile without appropriate strategy implementation and should seek a coherent interface between those responsible for the strategic planning process and those responsible for implementation to ensure that each group is working to the same set of objectives. With the development of the market economy in Turkey, and the increased competition from foreign firms as globalisation proceeds, it may be necessary for the Turkish firms to increasingly adopt the techniques and tools of strategic planning. This paper provides some important insights to the applicability of Western strategic management thinking to the business environment in emerging countries.

    KW - corporate strategy

    KW - cross cultural studies

    KW - strategic planning

    KW - Turkey

    U2 - 10.1108/02621710910947380

    DO - 10.1108/02621710910947380

    M3 - Article

    VL - 28

    SP - 361

    EP - 379

    JO - Journal of Management Development

    T2 - Journal of Management Development

    JF - Journal of Management Development

    SN - 0262-1711

    IS - 4

    ER -