A comparison of special, general and support teachers' controllability and stability attributions for children's difficulties in learning

Lisa Woolfson, Elizabeth Grant, Lindsay Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study aimed to explore teachers' attributions for learner difficulties in their schoolwork. In order to explore their attributions of controllability and stability, three groups of teachers, general mainstream class teachers (N = 39), mainstream learning support teachers (N = 35), and special school teachers (N = 25) were asked to rate vignettes about children's difficulties. The results showed that the two groups of teachers working in the mainstream settings viewed learners with identified support needs as having less control over their performance than those with no specific support needs, while special school teachers viewed both learner groups similarly. Similar findings were found for teacher attributions of controllability in high- and low-ability learners. Stability attributions across all conditions showed that special school teachers viewed children's difficulties as more amenable to change than did the two groups of mainstream teachers. The implications of these findings for inclusion in mainstream schools are discussed.
LanguageEnglish
Pages295-306
Number of pages11
JournalEducational Psychology
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Mar 2007

Fingerprint

attribution
Aptitude
Learning
teacher
learning
school
Group
School Teachers
ability
inclusion

Keywords

  • educational psychology
  • learning
  • teaching
  • children

Cite this

@article{a6f863c73f8a41098d252580a24a6798,
title = "A comparison of special, general and support teachers' controllability and stability attributions for children's difficulties in learning",
abstract = "The study aimed to explore teachers' attributions for learner difficulties in their schoolwork. In order to explore their attributions of controllability and stability, three groups of teachers, general mainstream class teachers (N = 39), mainstream learning support teachers (N = 35), and special school teachers (N = 25) were asked to rate vignettes about children's difficulties. The results showed that the two groups of teachers working in the mainstream settings viewed learners with identified support needs as having less control over their performance than those with no specific support needs, while special school teachers viewed both learner groups similarly. Similar findings were found for teacher attributions of controllability in high- and low-ability learners. Stability attributions across all conditions showed that special school teachers viewed children's difficulties as more amenable to change than did the two groups of mainstream teachers. The implications of these findings for inclusion in mainstream schools are discussed.",
keywords = "educational psychology, learning, teaching, children",
author = "Lisa Woolfson and Elizabeth Grant and Lindsay Campbell",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1080/01443410601066826",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "295--306",
journal = "Educational Psychology",
issn = "0144-3410",
number = "2",

}

A comparison of special, general and support teachers' controllability and stability attributions for children's difficulties in learning. / Woolfson, Lisa; Grant, Elizabeth; Campbell, Lindsay.

In: Educational Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 2, 19.03.2007, p. 295-306.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of special, general and support teachers' controllability and stability attributions for children's difficulties in learning

AU - Woolfson, Lisa

AU - Grant, Elizabeth

AU - Campbell, Lindsay

PY - 2007/3/19

Y1 - 2007/3/19

N2 - The study aimed to explore teachers' attributions for learner difficulties in their schoolwork. In order to explore their attributions of controllability and stability, three groups of teachers, general mainstream class teachers (N = 39), mainstream learning support teachers (N = 35), and special school teachers (N = 25) were asked to rate vignettes about children's difficulties. The results showed that the two groups of teachers working in the mainstream settings viewed learners with identified support needs as having less control over their performance than those with no specific support needs, while special school teachers viewed both learner groups similarly. Similar findings were found for teacher attributions of controllability in high- and low-ability learners. Stability attributions across all conditions showed that special school teachers viewed children's difficulties as more amenable to change than did the two groups of mainstream teachers. The implications of these findings for inclusion in mainstream schools are discussed.

AB - The study aimed to explore teachers' attributions for learner difficulties in their schoolwork. In order to explore their attributions of controllability and stability, three groups of teachers, general mainstream class teachers (N = 39), mainstream learning support teachers (N = 35), and special school teachers (N = 25) were asked to rate vignettes about children's difficulties. The results showed that the two groups of teachers working in the mainstream settings viewed learners with identified support needs as having less control over their performance than those with no specific support needs, while special school teachers viewed both learner groups similarly. Similar findings were found for teacher attributions of controllability in high- and low-ability learners. Stability attributions across all conditions showed that special school teachers viewed children's difficulties as more amenable to change than did the two groups of mainstream teachers. The implications of these findings for inclusion in mainstream schools are discussed.

KW - educational psychology

KW - learning

KW - teaching

KW - children

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410601066826

U2 - 10.1080/01443410601066826

DO - 10.1080/01443410601066826

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 295

EP - 306

JO - Educational Psychology

T2 - Educational Psychology

JF - Educational Psychology

SN - 0144-3410

IS - 2

ER -