A comparison of methods for forensic DNA extraction

Chelex-100 (R) and the QIAGEN DNA Investigator Kit (manual and automated)

K. Phillips, N. McCallum, L. Welch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Efficient isolation of DNA from a sample is the basis for successful forensic DNA profiling. There are many DNA extraction methods available and they vary in their ability to efficiently extract the DNA; as well as in processing time, operator intervention, contamination risk and ease of use. In recent years, automated robots have been made available which speed up processing time and decrease the amount of operator input. This project was set up to investigate the efficiency of three DNA extraction methods, two manual (Chelex®-100 and the QIAGEN DNA Investigator Kit) and one automated (QIAcube), using both buccal cells and blood stains as the DNA source. Extracted DNA was quantified using real-time PCR in order to assess the amount of DNA present in each sample. Selected samples were then amplified using AmpFlSTR SGM Plus amplification kit. The results suggested that there was no statistical difference between results gained for the different methods investigated, but the automated QIAcube robot made sample processing much simpler and quicker without introducing DNA contamination.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-285
Number of pages4
JournalForensic Science International: Genetics
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
DNA
DNA Contamination
Blood Stains
DNA Fingerprinting
Chelex 100
Cheek
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Keywords

  • STR profiling
  • real-time PCR
  • Qiagen
  • DNA extraction
  • Chelex

Cite this

@article{b69c8c4f1bf6452fa952a5052bb82852,
title = "A comparison of methods for forensic DNA extraction: Chelex-100 (R) and the QIAGEN DNA Investigator Kit (manual and automated)",
abstract = "Efficient isolation of DNA from a sample is the basis for successful forensic DNA profiling. There are many DNA extraction methods available and they vary in their ability to efficiently extract the DNA; as well as in processing time, operator intervention, contamination risk and ease of use. In recent years, automated robots have been made available which speed up processing time and decrease the amount of operator input. This project was set up to investigate the efficiency of three DNA extraction methods, two manual (Chelex{\circledR}-100 and the QIAGEN DNA Investigator Kit) and one automated (QIAcube), using both buccal cells and blood stains as the DNA source. Extracted DNA was quantified using real-time PCR in order to assess the amount of DNA present in each sample. Selected samples were then amplified using AmpFlSTR SGM Plus amplification kit. The results suggested that there was no statistical difference between results gained for the different methods investigated, but the automated QIAcube robot made sample processing much simpler and quicker without introducing DNA contamination.",
keywords = "STR profiling, real-time PCR, Qiagen, DNA extraction, Chelex",
author = "K. Phillips and N. McCallum and L. Welch",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.04.018",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "282--285",
journal = "Forensic Science International: Genetics",
issn = "1872-4973",
number = "2",

}

A comparison of methods for forensic DNA extraction : Chelex-100 (R) and the QIAGEN DNA Investigator Kit (manual and automated). / Phillips, K.; McCallum, N.; Welch, L.

In: Forensic Science International: Genetics , Vol. 6, No. 2, 03.2012, p. 282-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of methods for forensic DNA extraction

T2 - Chelex-100 (R) and the QIAGEN DNA Investigator Kit (manual and automated)

AU - Phillips, K.

AU - McCallum, N.

AU - Welch, L.

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Efficient isolation of DNA from a sample is the basis for successful forensic DNA profiling. There are many DNA extraction methods available and they vary in their ability to efficiently extract the DNA; as well as in processing time, operator intervention, contamination risk and ease of use. In recent years, automated robots have been made available which speed up processing time and decrease the amount of operator input. This project was set up to investigate the efficiency of three DNA extraction methods, two manual (Chelex®-100 and the QIAGEN DNA Investigator Kit) and one automated (QIAcube), using both buccal cells and blood stains as the DNA source. Extracted DNA was quantified using real-time PCR in order to assess the amount of DNA present in each sample. Selected samples were then amplified using AmpFlSTR SGM Plus amplification kit. The results suggested that there was no statistical difference between results gained for the different methods investigated, but the automated QIAcube robot made sample processing much simpler and quicker without introducing DNA contamination.

AB - Efficient isolation of DNA from a sample is the basis for successful forensic DNA profiling. There are many DNA extraction methods available and they vary in their ability to efficiently extract the DNA; as well as in processing time, operator intervention, contamination risk and ease of use. In recent years, automated robots have been made available which speed up processing time and decrease the amount of operator input. This project was set up to investigate the efficiency of three DNA extraction methods, two manual (Chelex®-100 and the QIAGEN DNA Investigator Kit) and one automated (QIAcube), using both buccal cells and blood stains as the DNA source. Extracted DNA was quantified using real-time PCR in order to assess the amount of DNA present in each sample. Selected samples were then amplified using AmpFlSTR SGM Plus amplification kit. The results suggested that there was no statistical difference between results gained for the different methods investigated, but the automated QIAcube robot made sample processing much simpler and quicker without introducing DNA contamination.

KW - STR profiling

KW - real-time PCR

KW - Qiagen

KW - DNA extraction

KW - Chelex

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857059846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.04.018

DO - 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.04.018

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 282

EP - 285

JO - Forensic Science International: Genetics

JF - Forensic Science International: Genetics

SN - 1872-4973

IS - 2

ER -