A comparison of methadone and buprenorphine–naloxone as opioidsubstitution therapy: he patient perspective in NHS Lanarkshire

Duncan R. Hill, Stephen Conroy, Debbie Lang, Siobhan Steele, Derna Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article was designed to assess the viewpoint of patients in NHS North Lanarkshire, on theuse of buprenorphine–naloxone versus methadone for opioid substitution. Ninety patientsfrom NHS Lanarkshire were questioned on comparing methadone and buprenorphine–naloxone treatment. Only one significant comparison was obtained from statistical analysisconducted (p50.05). This was evident for drug (methadone/buprenorphine–naloxone)and patient preference. The article finds that in comparison to methadone, patients receivingbuprenorphine–naloxone were highly positive about their treatment experiences and itsadvantages over methadone, including the ‘‘clear-headed response’’, improved well-beingand concentration, possibility of less social stigma, reduced craving, decreased side effects(especially drowsiness) and easier to withdraw from. As a result, about 57% of patients wouldconsider buprenorphine–naloxone treatment in the near future.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)168-177
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Substance Use
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Mar 2014

Keywords

  • addiction
  • buprenorphine naxolone
  • methadone
  • treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of methadone and buprenorphine–naloxone as opioidsubstitution therapy: he patient perspective in NHS Lanarkshire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this