Activities per year
Prototypes are a common feature of many product design and development endeavours. An ever widening range of prototyping options are available to designers and engineers. May particular options be superior to others, or more appropriate for particular endeavours? This paper reviews current literature on the nature of what constitutes a prototype and the benefits they offer to the discipline. They principally facilitate communication, aid learning, help gain and provide feedback, inform decision making and generally provide superior design outcomes. In order to determine if any particular manner of prototype is preferable for achieving these benefits a comparative study of some of the contemporary prototyping methods is subsequently conducted: A 3D printed prototype (physical prototype), a CAD prototype (represented using a computer monitor), an augmented reality prototype (represented using a tablet device) and a virtual reality prototype (represented using a stereo projector and polarised glasses). The results indicate that while all provide benefits, overall the physical prototype performs best and the augmented reality prototype performs most poorly.
|Number of pages||10|
|Journal||Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design|
|Publication status||Published - 31 Jul 2019|
|Event||22nd International Conference on Engineering Design: Responsible Design for our Future - Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands|
Duration: 5 Aug 2019 → 8 Aug 2019
Conference number: 22
- virtual reality
- 3D printing
- product modelling
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'A comparison of contemporary prototyping methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- 1 Participation in conference
22nd International Conference on Engineering Design
Andrew Wodehouse (Participant)5 Aug 2019 → 8 Aug 2019
Activity: Participating in or organising an event types › Participation in conference