A comparison of AC and HVDC options for the connection of offshore wind generation in Great Britain

Douglas Elliott, Keith R. W. Bell, Stephen J. Finney, Ram Adapa, Cornel Brozio, James Yu, Khadim Hussain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)
4397 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of two forms of cable connection of a distant offshore wind farm to a transmission system: AC and HVDC. The requirements of relevant industry standards in Great Britain (GB) that drive a connection design and, hence, its cost are highlighted along with an analysis of the ways in which AC cable connections might be made to comply while facilitating export of active power. Dynamic studies investigating responses to grid-side short circuit faults show that, in the particular scenarios studied, an AC connection of a wind farm in the place of a large synchronous generator is marginally detrimental while an HVDC connection is beneficial. A comparison of costs shows that the cross-over distance at which HVDC is cheaper than AC for wind farms of different sizes occurs at longer distances than have hitherto commonly been assumed, and AC connections benefit from reactive compensation not only at the point of common coupling and wind farm end but also at the connection mid-point.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)798-809
Number of pages12
JournalIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
Volume31
Issue number2
Early online date7 Jul 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Cables
Offshore wind farms
Synchronous generators
Short circuit currents
Costs
Industry
Compensation and Redress

Keywords

  • wind energy
  • cables
  • HVDC
  • reactive power
  • voltage control
  • power system stability
  • power system economics

Cite this

Elliott, Douglas ; Bell, Keith R. W. ; Finney, Stephen J. ; Adapa, Ram ; Brozio, Cornel ; Yu, James ; Hussain, Khadim. / A comparison of AC and HVDC options for the connection of offshore wind generation in Great Britain. In: IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 798-809.
@article{403c412123634aa2ab669ef5f1628444,
title = "A comparison of AC and HVDC options for the connection of offshore wind generation in Great Britain",
abstract = "This paper presents a comparison of two forms of cable connection of a distant offshore wind farm to a transmission system: AC and HVDC. The requirements of relevant industry standards in Great Britain (GB) that drive a connection design and, hence, its cost are highlighted along with an analysis of the ways in which AC cable connections might be made to comply while facilitating export of active power. Dynamic studies investigating responses to grid-side short circuit faults show that, in the particular scenarios studied, an AC connection of a wind farm in the place of a large synchronous generator is marginally detrimental while an HVDC connection is beneficial. A comparison of costs shows that the cross-over distance at which HVDC is cheaper than AC for wind farms of different sizes occurs at longer distances than have hitherto commonly been assumed, and AC connections benefit from reactive compensation not only at the point of common coupling and wind farm end but also at the connection mid-point.",
keywords = "wind energy, cables, HVDC, reactive power, voltage control, power system stability, power system economics",
author = "Douglas Elliott and Bell, {Keith R. W.} and Finney, {Stephen J.} and Ram Adapa and Cornel Brozio and James Yu and Khadim Hussain",
note = "(c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other users, including reprinting/ republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted components of this work in other works.",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1109/TPWRD.2015.2453233",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "798--809",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery",
issn = "0885-8977",
number = "2",

}

A comparison of AC and HVDC options for the connection of offshore wind generation in Great Britain. / Elliott, Douglas; Bell, Keith R. W.; Finney, Stephen J.; Adapa, Ram; Brozio, Cornel; Yu, James; Hussain, Khadim.

In: IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 31, No. 2, 30.04.2016, p. 798-809.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of AC and HVDC options for the connection of offshore wind generation in Great Britain

AU - Elliott, Douglas

AU - Bell, Keith R. W.

AU - Finney, Stephen J.

AU - Adapa, Ram

AU - Brozio, Cornel

AU - Yu, James

AU - Hussain, Khadim

N1 - (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other users, including reprinting/ republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted components of this work in other works.

PY - 2016/4/30

Y1 - 2016/4/30

N2 - This paper presents a comparison of two forms of cable connection of a distant offshore wind farm to a transmission system: AC and HVDC. The requirements of relevant industry standards in Great Britain (GB) that drive a connection design and, hence, its cost are highlighted along with an analysis of the ways in which AC cable connections might be made to comply while facilitating export of active power. Dynamic studies investigating responses to grid-side short circuit faults show that, in the particular scenarios studied, an AC connection of a wind farm in the place of a large synchronous generator is marginally detrimental while an HVDC connection is beneficial. A comparison of costs shows that the cross-over distance at which HVDC is cheaper than AC for wind farms of different sizes occurs at longer distances than have hitherto commonly been assumed, and AC connections benefit from reactive compensation not only at the point of common coupling and wind farm end but also at the connection mid-point.

AB - This paper presents a comparison of two forms of cable connection of a distant offshore wind farm to a transmission system: AC and HVDC. The requirements of relevant industry standards in Great Britain (GB) that drive a connection design and, hence, its cost are highlighted along with an analysis of the ways in which AC cable connections might be made to comply while facilitating export of active power. Dynamic studies investigating responses to grid-side short circuit faults show that, in the particular scenarios studied, an AC connection of a wind farm in the place of a large synchronous generator is marginally detrimental while an HVDC connection is beneficial. A comparison of costs shows that the cross-over distance at which HVDC is cheaper than AC for wind farms of different sizes occurs at longer distances than have hitherto commonly been assumed, and AC connections benefit from reactive compensation not only at the point of common coupling and wind farm end but also at the connection mid-point.

KW - wind energy

KW - cables

KW - HVDC

KW - reactive power

KW - voltage control

KW - power system stability

KW - power system economics

U2 - 10.1109/TPWRD.2015.2453233

DO - 10.1109/TPWRD.2015.2453233

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 798

EP - 809

JO - IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery

JF - IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery

SN - 0885-8977

IS - 2

ER -