A comparative analysis of evolution of lean production in the international automotive industry in Britain and Poland

Paul Stewart, Andy Danford, Adam Mrozowicki, Kenny Murphy

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

In this presentation of work in progress we want to report on initial findings of research conducted at General Motors UK and Poland; BMW-UK; VW Poland. We report on the development of a range of managerial practices at the workplace level in Poland and the UK (four plants in total) often described as lean production techniques. We examine these with respect to their impact on employees' perceptions of quality of work life (viz; work intensification/stress); involvement/engagement; skill, training and their relationship to participation; management control (autonomy/bullying-mobbing). While advocates of lean have argued consistently that with the right management in the right place, lean will prevail, no evidence has ever been advanced demonstrating the higher levels of employee satisfaction in lean regimes. This is not surprising for at least two reasons. In contrast to the ideology of lean, the impact of systems so defined is deleterious to worker health and the quality of the ir life at work. While there are variations with and between the plants in our study, nevertheless, the data highlights the growing disjuncture between claims and evidence. We say 'growing' because while we have known from the evidence of this and other sectors for some time, that what managers terms compromises workers’ quality of life at work, the gap is not in the credibility but in the growing body of evidence. Thus, we seek to highlight both the character of the variation in lean practices across and within plants together with the ideological role of lean. Our methodology included questionnaires and interviews with employees and union officials in four companies (GM-UK & Poland; BMW-UK; WV Poland).
LanguageEnglish
Publication statusUnpublished - 20 Nov 2013
EventGERPISA 21st Annual Colloquium - Paris, France
Duration: 12 Jun 201314 Jun 2013

Conference

ConferenceGERPISA 21st Annual Colloquium
CountryFrance
CityParis
Period12/06/1314/06/13

Fingerprint

Lean production
Poland
Automotive industry
Comparative analysis
Work place
Skills training
Work intensification
General Motors
Workers
Managers
Management control
Bullying
Compromise
Employee perceptions
Employees
Quality of work life
Quality of life
Credibility
Autonomy
Managerial practices

Keywords

  • competitiveness
  • costs
  • employment relationships

Cite this

Stewart, P., Danford, A., Mrozowicki, A., & Murphy, K. (2013). A comparative analysis of evolution of lean production in the international automotive industry in Britain and Poland. Paper presented at GERPISA 21st Annual Colloquium, Paris, France.
Stewart, Paul ; Danford, Andy ; Mrozowicki, Adam ; Murphy, Kenny. / A comparative analysis of evolution of lean production in the international automotive industry in Britain and Poland. Paper presented at GERPISA 21st Annual Colloquium, Paris, France.
@conference{013a4d292e2c40338ef8c4d79f06d3b7,
title = "A comparative analysis of evolution of lean production in the international automotive industry in Britain and Poland",
abstract = "In this presentation of work in progress we want to report on initial findings of research conducted at General Motors UK and Poland; BMW-UK; VW Poland. We report on the development of a range of managerial practices at the workplace level in Poland and the UK (four plants in total) often described as lean production techniques. We examine these with respect to their impact on employees' perceptions of quality of work life (viz; work intensification/stress); involvement/engagement; skill, training and their relationship to participation; management control (autonomy/bullying-mobbing). While advocates of lean have argued consistently that with the right management in the right place, lean will prevail, no evidence has ever been advanced demonstrating the higher levels of employee satisfaction in lean regimes. This is not surprising for at least two reasons. In contrast to the ideology of lean, the impact of systems so defined is deleterious to worker health and the quality of the ir life at work. While there are variations with and between the plants in our study, nevertheless, the data highlights the growing disjuncture between claims and evidence. We say 'growing' because while we have known from the evidence of this and other sectors for some time, that what managers terms compromises workers’ quality of life at work, the gap is not in the credibility but in the growing body of evidence. Thus, we seek to highlight both the character of the variation in lean practices across and within plants together with the ideological role of lean. Our methodology included questionnaires and interviews with employees and union officials in four companies (GM-UK & Poland; BMW-UK; WV Poland).",
keywords = "competitiveness, costs, employment relationships",
author = "Paul Stewart and Andy Danford and Adam Mrozowicki and Kenny Murphy",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "20",
language = "English",
note = "GERPISA 21st Annual Colloquium ; Conference date: 12-06-2013 Through 14-06-2013",

}

Stewart, P, Danford, A, Mrozowicki, A & Murphy, K 2013, 'A comparative analysis of evolution of lean production in the international automotive industry in Britain and Poland' Paper presented at GERPISA 21st Annual Colloquium, Paris, France, 12/06/13 - 14/06/13, .

A comparative analysis of evolution of lean production in the international automotive industry in Britain and Poland. / Stewart, Paul; Danford, Andy; Mrozowicki, Adam; Murphy, Kenny.

2013. Paper presented at GERPISA 21st Annual Colloquium, Paris, France.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - A comparative analysis of evolution of lean production in the international automotive industry in Britain and Poland

AU - Stewart, Paul

AU - Danford, Andy

AU - Mrozowicki, Adam

AU - Murphy, Kenny

PY - 2013/11/20

Y1 - 2013/11/20

N2 - In this presentation of work in progress we want to report on initial findings of research conducted at General Motors UK and Poland; BMW-UK; VW Poland. We report on the development of a range of managerial practices at the workplace level in Poland and the UK (four plants in total) often described as lean production techniques. We examine these with respect to their impact on employees' perceptions of quality of work life (viz; work intensification/stress); involvement/engagement; skill, training and their relationship to participation; management control (autonomy/bullying-mobbing). While advocates of lean have argued consistently that with the right management in the right place, lean will prevail, no evidence has ever been advanced demonstrating the higher levels of employee satisfaction in lean regimes. This is not surprising for at least two reasons. In contrast to the ideology of lean, the impact of systems so defined is deleterious to worker health and the quality of the ir life at work. While there are variations with and between the plants in our study, nevertheless, the data highlights the growing disjuncture between claims and evidence. We say 'growing' because while we have known from the evidence of this and other sectors for some time, that what managers terms compromises workers’ quality of life at work, the gap is not in the credibility but in the growing body of evidence. Thus, we seek to highlight both the character of the variation in lean practices across and within plants together with the ideological role of lean. Our methodology included questionnaires and interviews with employees and union officials in four companies (GM-UK & Poland; BMW-UK; WV Poland).

AB - In this presentation of work in progress we want to report on initial findings of research conducted at General Motors UK and Poland; BMW-UK; VW Poland. We report on the development of a range of managerial practices at the workplace level in Poland and the UK (four plants in total) often described as lean production techniques. We examine these with respect to their impact on employees' perceptions of quality of work life (viz; work intensification/stress); involvement/engagement; skill, training and their relationship to participation; management control (autonomy/bullying-mobbing). While advocates of lean have argued consistently that with the right management in the right place, lean will prevail, no evidence has ever been advanced demonstrating the higher levels of employee satisfaction in lean regimes. This is not surprising for at least two reasons. In contrast to the ideology of lean, the impact of systems so defined is deleterious to worker health and the quality of the ir life at work. While there are variations with and between the plants in our study, nevertheless, the data highlights the growing disjuncture between claims and evidence. We say 'growing' because while we have known from the evidence of this and other sectors for some time, that what managers terms compromises workers’ quality of life at work, the gap is not in the credibility but in the growing body of evidence. Thus, we seek to highlight both the character of the variation in lean practices across and within plants together with the ideological role of lean. Our methodology included questionnaires and interviews with employees and union officials in four companies (GM-UK & Poland; BMW-UK; WV Poland).

KW - competitiveness

KW - costs

KW - employment relationships

UR - http://gerpisa.org/node/2136

M3 - Paper

ER -

Stewart P, Danford A, Mrozowicki A, Murphy K. A comparative analysis of evolution of lean production in the international automotive industry in Britain and Poland. 2013. Paper presented at GERPISA 21st Annual Colloquium, Paris, France.