A commentary on Liang et al.'s paper with regard to emerging views of memory assessment in Alzheimer's disease

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Liang et al. (2016) reported on a study carried out to investigate whether Alzheimer's disease in its familial variant (FAD) affects visual short-term memory (VSTM) for integrated representations comprising visuospatial information i.e., object and location. This is the second study investigating VSTM binding abilities in symptomatic and pre-symptomatic cases of FAD. An earlier study investigated VSTM for integrated representations comprising surface features such as shapes and colours (Parra, Abrahams, Logie, Mendez, et al., 2010). The memory function investigated by Liang et al. (2016) is known as “relational binding” whereas that one investigated by Parra, Abrahams, Logie, Mendez, et al. (2010) is known as “conjunctive binding”. Visuospatial relational binding deficits in long-term memory (LTM), also known as associative learning impairments, have been previously reported in cases of sporadic AD (SAD) in the clinical (Swainson et al., 2001) and prodromal stages (Fowler, Saling, Conway, Semple, & Louis, 2002). Parra, Abrahams, Logie, and Della Sala (2010) have reported VSTM conjunctive binding deficits in SAD. Taken together, the results from these studies suggest that AD affects memory binding abilities regardless of the variant of the disease, the memory system where bound representations are held, or the nature of such representations (i.e., shapes, colours, locations).The evidence drawn from rare cases of FAD is expected to support research into AD broadly. I will therefore focus my commentary on memory assessment in AD as a disorder affecting people at different ages. Particularly, I will focus on four areas on which Liang et al.’s study motivates debate: (1) format and structure of memory, (2) the effect of age on memory representations, (3) memory at the boundaries between normal and abnormal ageing, and (4) a new memory paradigm for the early detection of AD.
LanguageEnglish
Pages198-200
Number of pages3
JournalCortex
Volume88
Early online date18 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Alzheimer Disease
Short-Term Memory
Flavin-Adenine Dinucleotide
Aptitude
Color
Prodromal Symptoms
Long-Term Memory
Learning
Research

Keywords

  • Alzheimer disease
  • cognition
  • humans
  • memory disorders
  • neuropsychological tests

Cite this

@article{a556ccec644744848ef4227e9e463814,
title = "A commentary on Liang et al.'s paper with regard to emerging views of memory assessment in Alzheimer's disease",
abstract = "Liang et al. (2016) reported on a study carried out to investigate whether Alzheimer's disease in its familial variant (FAD) affects visual short-term memory (VSTM) for integrated representations comprising visuospatial information i.e., object and location. This is the second study investigating VSTM binding abilities in symptomatic and pre-symptomatic cases of FAD. An earlier study investigated VSTM for integrated representations comprising surface features such as shapes and colours (Parra, Abrahams, Logie, Mendez, et al., 2010). The memory function investigated by Liang et al. (2016) is known as “relational binding” whereas that one investigated by Parra, Abrahams, Logie, Mendez, et al. (2010) is known as “conjunctive binding”. Visuospatial relational binding deficits in long-term memory (LTM), also known as associative learning impairments, have been previously reported in cases of sporadic AD (SAD) in the clinical (Swainson et al., 2001) and prodromal stages (Fowler, Saling, Conway, Semple, & Louis, 2002). Parra, Abrahams, Logie, and Della Sala (2010) have reported VSTM conjunctive binding deficits in SAD. Taken together, the results from these studies suggest that AD affects memory binding abilities regardless of the variant of the disease, the memory system where bound representations are held, or the nature of such representations (i.e., shapes, colours, locations).The evidence drawn from rare cases of FAD is expected to support research into AD broadly. I will therefore focus my commentary on memory assessment in AD as a disorder affecting people at different ages. Particularly, I will focus on four areas on which Liang et al.’s study motivates debate: (1) format and structure of memory, (2) the effect of age on memory representations, (3) memory at the boundaries between normal and abnormal ageing, and (4) a new memory paradigm for the early detection of AD.",
keywords = "Alzheimer disease, cognition, humans, memory disorders, neuropsychological tests",
author = "Parra, {Mario Alfredo}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.006",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "198--200",
journal = "Cortex",
issn = "0010-9452",

}

A commentary on Liang et al.'s paper with regard to emerging views of memory assessment in Alzheimer's disease. / Parra, Mario Alfredo.

In: Cortex, Vol. 88, 31.03.2017, p. 198-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A commentary on Liang et al.'s paper with regard to emerging views of memory assessment in Alzheimer's disease

AU - Parra, Mario Alfredo

PY - 2017/3/31

Y1 - 2017/3/31

N2 - Liang et al. (2016) reported on a study carried out to investigate whether Alzheimer's disease in its familial variant (FAD) affects visual short-term memory (VSTM) for integrated representations comprising visuospatial information i.e., object and location. This is the second study investigating VSTM binding abilities in symptomatic and pre-symptomatic cases of FAD. An earlier study investigated VSTM for integrated representations comprising surface features such as shapes and colours (Parra, Abrahams, Logie, Mendez, et al., 2010). The memory function investigated by Liang et al. (2016) is known as “relational binding” whereas that one investigated by Parra, Abrahams, Logie, Mendez, et al. (2010) is known as “conjunctive binding”. Visuospatial relational binding deficits in long-term memory (LTM), also known as associative learning impairments, have been previously reported in cases of sporadic AD (SAD) in the clinical (Swainson et al., 2001) and prodromal stages (Fowler, Saling, Conway, Semple, & Louis, 2002). Parra, Abrahams, Logie, and Della Sala (2010) have reported VSTM conjunctive binding deficits in SAD. Taken together, the results from these studies suggest that AD affects memory binding abilities regardless of the variant of the disease, the memory system where bound representations are held, or the nature of such representations (i.e., shapes, colours, locations).The evidence drawn from rare cases of FAD is expected to support research into AD broadly. I will therefore focus my commentary on memory assessment in AD as a disorder affecting people at different ages. Particularly, I will focus on four areas on which Liang et al.’s study motivates debate: (1) format and structure of memory, (2) the effect of age on memory representations, (3) memory at the boundaries between normal and abnormal ageing, and (4) a new memory paradigm for the early detection of AD.

AB - Liang et al. (2016) reported on a study carried out to investigate whether Alzheimer's disease in its familial variant (FAD) affects visual short-term memory (VSTM) for integrated representations comprising visuospatial information i.e., object and location. This is the second study investigating VSTM binding abilities in symptomatic and pre-symptomatic cases of FAD. An earlier study investigated VSTM for integrated representations comprising surface features such as shapes and colours (Parra, Abrahams, Logie, Mendez, et al., 2010). The memory function investigated by Liang et al. (2016) is known as “relational binding” whereas that one investigated by Parra, Abrahams, Logie, Mendez, et al. (2010) is known as “conjunctive binding”. Visuospatial relational binding deficits in long-term memory (LTM), also known as associative learning impairments, have been previously reported in cases of sporadic AD (SAD) in the clinical (Swainson et al., 2001) and prodromal stages (Fowler, Saling, Conway, Semple, & Louis, 2002). Parra, Abrahams, Logie, and Della Sala (2010) have reported VSTM conjunctive binding deficits in SAD. Taken together, the results from these studies suggest that AD affects memory binding abilities regardless of the variant of the disease, the memory system where bound representations are held, or the nature of such representations (i.e., shapes, colours, locations).The evidence drawn from rare cases of FAD is expected to support research into AD broadly. I will therefore focus my commentary on memory assessment in AD as a disorder affecting people at different ages. Particularly, I will focus on four areas on which Liang et al.’s study motivates debate: (1) format and structure of memory, (2) the effect of age on memory representations, (3) memory at the boundaries between normal and abnormal ageing, and (4) a new memory paradigm for the early detection of AD.

KW - Alzheimer disease

KW - cognition

KW - humans

KW - memory disorders

KW - neuropsychological tests

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/cortex

UR - https://researchportal.hw.ac.uk/en/publications/a-commentary-on-liang-et-als-paper-with-regard-to-emerging-views-

U2 - 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.006

DO - 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.006

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 198

EP - 200

JO - Cortex

T2 - Cortex

JF - Cortex

SN - 0010-9452

ER -