A comment on "What catch data can tell us about the status of global fisheries"

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
199 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is considerable interest in the state of the world’s natural fishery resources. The paper by Froese et al. (2012) is a recent example of applying a set of ad hoc decision rules to a time series of catch data in order to assign the world’s fisheries to categories of exploitation and hence make generalisations about their current status. They conclude that the percentage of stocks that are over-exploited is worse than previously reported in FAO (2010). The approach used by Froese et al. is based on an algorithm proposed by Froese and Kesner-Reyes (2002) which has been heavily criticised both on theoretical grounds and
from simulation studies (Branch et al. 2011; Daan et al. 2011; Wilberg and Miller 2007). In their recent paper, Froese et al. (2012) produce additional analyses to support their method which assumes that maximum sustainable yield (MSY) lies in the interval (0.5Cmax, Cmax), where Cmax is the maximum observed catch in the time series. Unfortunately, these analyses do not support their contention that MSY for a particular stock is related to maximum catch in a predictable way and renders their conclusions unsafe
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1761-1873
Number of pages3
JournalMarine Biology
Volume160
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

maximum sustainable yield
catch statistics
time series analysis
fishery
fisheries
time series
Food and Agricultural Organization
natural resources
natural resource
simulation
world
methodology
method
decision

Keywords

  • global fisheries
  • catch data
  • status

Cite this

@article{ed224af439914ce191c2bbe05dc33991,
title = "A comment on {"}What catch data can tell us about the status of global fisheries{"}",
abstract = "There is considerable interest in the state of the world’s natural fishery resources. The paper by Froese et al. (2012) is a recent example of applying a set of ad hoc decision rules to a time series of catch data in order to assign the world’s fisheries to categories of exploitation and hence make generalisations about their current status. They conclude that the percentage of stocks that are over-exploited is worse than previously reported in FAO (2010). The approach used by Froese et al. is based on an algorithm proposed by Froese and Kesner-Reyes (2002) which has been heavily criticised both on theoretical grounds andfrom simulation studies (Branch et al. 2011; Daan et al. 2011; Wilberg and Miller 2007). In their recent paper, Froese et al. (2012) produce additional analyses to support their method which assumes that maximum sustainable yield (MSY) lies in the interval (0.5Cmax, Cmax), where Cmax is the maximum observed catch in the time series. Unfortunately, these analyses do not support their contention that MSY for a particular stock is related to maximum catch in a predictable way and renders their conclusions unsafe",
keywords = "global fisheries , catch data , status",
author = "Robin Cook",
note = "added page numbers and vol",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s00227-013-2183-y",
language = "English",
volume = "160",
pages = "1761--1873",
journal = "Marine Biology",
issn = "0025-3162",
number = "7",

}

A comment on "What catch data can tell us about the status of global fisheries". / Cook, Robin.

In: Marine Biology, Vol. 160, No. 7, 2013, p. 1761-1873.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comment on "What catch data can tell us about the status of global fisheries"

AU - Cook, Robin

N1 - added page numbers and vol

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - There is considerable interest in the state of the world’s natural fishery resources. The paper by Froese et al. (2012) is a recent example of applying a set of ad hoc decision rules to a time series of catch data in order to assign the world’s fisheries to categories of exploitation and hence make generalisations about their current status. They conclude that the percentage of stocks that are over-exploited is worse than previously reported in FAO (2010). The approach used by Froese et al. is based on an algorithm proposed by Froese and Kesner-Reyes (2002) which has been heavily criticised both on theoretical grounds andfrom simulation studies (Branch et al. 2011; Daan et al. 2011; Wilberg and Miller 2007). In their recent paper, Froese et al. (2012) produce additional analyses to support their method which assumes that maximum sustainable yield (MSY) lies in the interval (0.5Cmax, Cmax), where Cmax is the maximum observed catch in the time series. Unfortunately, these analyses do not support their contention that MSY for a particular stock is related to maximum catch in a predictable way and renders their conclusions unsafe

AB - There is considerable interest in the state of the world’s natural fishery resources. The paper by Froese et al. (2012) is a recent example of applying a set of ad hoc decision rules to a time series of catch data in order to assign the world’s fisheries to categories of exploitation and hence make generalisations about their current status. They conclude that the percentage of stocks that are over-exploited is worse than previously reported in FAO (2010). The approach used by Froese et al. is based on an algorithm proposed by Froese and Kesner-Reyes (2002) which has been heavily criticised both on theoretical grounds andfrom simulation studies (Branch et al. 2011; Daan et al. 2011; Wilberg and Miller 2007). In their recent paper, Froese et al. (2012) produce additional analyses to support their method which assumes that maximum sustainable yield (MSY) lies in the interval (0.5Cmax, Cmax), where Cmax is the maximum observed catch in the time series. Unfortunately, these analyses do not support their contention that MSY for a particular stock is related to maximum catch in a predictable way and renders their conclusions unsafe

KW - global fisheries

KW - catch data

KW - status

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879197502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00227-013-2183-y

DO - 10.1007/s00227-013-2183-y

M3 - Article

VL - 160

SP - 1761

EP - 1873

JO - Marine Biology

JF - Marine Biology

SN - 0025-3162

IS - 7

ER -